Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20841 judgments · newest first · showing 2201–2400
The Executing Engineer of the Upper Pravara Irrigation Project filed multiple civil applications seeking a stay and condonation of delay against respondents Baban Chima Malunjkar and another. The acquiring body deposited the amount as directed by the Court on 31 August 2026, following the order …
The Executing Engineer of the Upper Pravara Project filed multiple civil applications seeking a stay of execution and condonation of delay. The acquiring body deposited the amount as directed by the Court's order dated 30.03.2026, completing the deposit on 31.08.2026. The Court confirmed the …
The Executive Engineer of the Upper Pravara Irrigation Project filed multiple civil applications seeking a stay and condonation of delay against Baban Chima Malunjkar and another. The acquiring body deposited the amount as directed by the Court on 31 August 2026, following an order dated 30 March …
Ibrahim Munir Shaikh filed a writ petition challenging a Labour Court award dated 21 November 2017 that dismissed his reference concerning a termination alleged to have occurred on 1 October 1999. The petitioner had issued a demand notice in August 2015 and approached the Conciliation Officer only …
The appellants filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay, setting aside abatement, and permission to bring the legal representatives of deceased parties on record. The court examined whether the delays—ranging from 673 to 4,967 days—were deliberately caused, invoking Section 5 …
The appellant, Pushpa Kailas Kamble, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, counsel submitted that the appellant had died and produced a death certificate, which the court recorded. The court considered whether the appeal could continue in …
The New India Assurance Company Limited filed a civil application seeking a stay of execution and operation of an impugned judgment and award against Balu Vitthal Dhumal and others. The High Court considered whether it could grant an ad‑interim stay pending further proceedings. The Court ordered …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of a clerk, Youraj, who was charged under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding a Rs 500 bribe to forward a land‑acquisition proposal. The complainant initially lodged a complaint and was …
The petitioners sought compensation after their daughter died from electrocution, challenging a Permanent Lok Adalat award of Rs.2 lakh for loss of income and Rs.50,000 for loss of love and affection. They argued that the multiplier method used in motor accident cases should apply to increase the …
The applicant, Raj @ Anil Dhage, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge‑1, Parbhani, under section 306 of the Indian Penal Code for abetment of suicide and sentenced to five years' imprisonment. He filed a criminal application under section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking …
The petitioners were awarded certificates of excellent work and advance increments for the years 2006‑2008 and received the corresponding payments. A later Government Resolution dated 24‑08‑2017 sought to withdraw those benefits and recover the amounts already paid. The petitioners challenged the …
The petitioners, legal heirs of a deceased defendant, challenged an order dated 12.03.2026 that granted police protection to enforce a temporary injunction on suit property without giving them notice or bringing them on record in the underlying partition suit. The trial court had earlier granted a …
The applicants sought condonation of a 22‑year delay in filing an appeal under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act against a compensation award made under Section 11 for land acquired for a minor irrigation tank. The reference on the award was decided in 2004; the applicants only obtained …
The applicant, Vikas Sakharam Sonwane, filed a bail application. An interim order dated 30 April 2026 granted him relief, subject to certain conditions, and he deposited the required amount, which was accepted by the State and the informant's counsel. The applicant sought confirmation of that …
Petitioner Dhiraj Laxmikant Patil filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra after the Education Officer failed to act on a direction from the Divisional Grievance Redressal Committee (DGRC) dated 23 June 2025, which had set aside the officer’s earlier order and required a …
Sarita Hiralal Patil filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking relief after the Education Officer failed to act on a direction from the Divisional Grievance Redressal Committee (DGRC). The DGRC had set aside the officer’s earlier order on 23 June 2025 and instructed him to …
The Executive Engineer of the Minor Irrigation Division appealed against a 2013 award of compensation in a land acquisition case concerning the estate of the late Shrimant Laxman Pawar. The appellant argued that the earlier decision of a coordinate bench (First Appeal No.1257 of 2008) covering the …
Anita Dasa Kasture filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Mohammed Azeem Moh Hakeem and others. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the court that the dispute had become infructuous, meaning there was no longer any substantive issue to …
A large group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007‑2012 sought regularisation, creation of permanent posts and arrears of salary, arguing that their work is of a perennial nature and that the Maharashtra Rural Development …
Mahananda Gangadharappa Buranade filed a writ petition challenging a civil miscellaneous application (No. 18 of 2019) filed by Vaishali Vijay Buranade. The court noted that the underlying civil application had already been disposed of on 28 April 2023, leaving no substantive matter for the petition …
The petitioners, Mirza Shahzadi Begum and Mirza Mustafa Baig, filed Writ Petition No. 4347 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, on 4 August 2026, they submitted written instructions seeking the court’s permission to …
Amol Narsingrao Patale filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging orders of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik. The petitioners sought relief and the court considered whether to allow amendment of the petition. The judges granted leave to amend …
The Bombay High Court heard multiple bail applications arising from Crime No.279 of 2025 involving the alleged organised trafficking of codeine‑based cough syrup under the NDPS Act, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The applicants argued that they were not identified by witnesses, …
The petitioners filed a contempt petition arising from a prior order. Respondent No.3 filed an affidavit stating that the contempt order had been complied with, and this was confirmed by the petitioners' counsel. The court examined the affidavit and the confirmation, finding that there was no longer …
The petitioners challenged the fixation of their one‑step pay scale (Ekstar) on the ground that it was not in accordance with the recommendations of the 6th and 7th Pay Commissions. They had submitted a detailed representation on 5 March 2026 to the concerned authority, which remained pending. The …
The High Court considered two writ petitions filed by educational trusts seeking full grant‑in‑aid from the State of Maharashtra. The petitions challenged a Government Resolution dated 6 November 2018 that reduced the aid to the petitioners. The Court noted that the matter had already been decided …
The petitioner filed a writ petition (No. 3232 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Over the years, the petition remained pending and, by the efflux of time, became infructuous. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petition could no longer be pursued. The Court …
The petitioner, Roshan Prabhakar Mutyepod, challenged a 10 July 2018 order of the Scrutiny Committee that invalidated his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. Although the petition was filed after a considerable delay, the Court required the petitioner to deposit Rs.1,00,000 to …
Mahesh @ Om Kantilal Chaudhari was arrested on 30 November 2025 in connection with a murder‑related case (Cr. No. 673/2025) and a charge sheet was filed on 27 February 2026 alleging offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant contended that there was no …
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking to bring on record the legal heirs of petitioner No.2, requesting condonation of delay. The respondents opposed the amendment, arguing procedural impropriety. The court examined the averments made in the application and found them sufficient to …
The applicant, Priti Chandrakant Magre, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 359 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking pre‑emptive release from custody. The State opposed the application. After hearing both sides, the Court expressed its disinclination to grant any …
The applicants, Hanumant Ram Bhalerao and Jayashri Hanumant Bhalerao, were arrested in March 2026 for alleged involvement in the suicide of Muskan, who was said to have been harassed and physically assaulted by them and co‑accused, with a demand of Rs.25,00,000 for a house and vehicle. The …
The claimants, whose land was acquired for a government project, filed applications seeking condonation of a 6,595‑day delay in filing their appeals. They explained the delay by citing the COVID‑19 pandemic and their financial difficulties. The Court examined whether such an extensive delay could be …
Multiple writ petitions (Nos. 1947, 4293, 5823, 5863, 6348, 6353, 6474, 6480 of 2026) were filed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The Court directed the petitioners to furnish spare copies of the petitions for service on the respondents within two weeks of the order. If the …
The applicant, Sheshrao, filed a petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking condonation of a 1,619‑day delay in filing a cross‑appeal against the Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division 1, Aurangabad. The court examined the application and the reasons provided for the …
The appellants, Balaji Vaijanathrao Damkondwar and others, appealed against a judgment and award dated 10 February 2006 by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmedpur, which refused to enhance compensation for land acquired in 1977. They argued that the compensation should be increased and that no …
The appellants, landowners whose property was acquired in 1977, challenged the compensation award dated 10 February 2006 given by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmedpur, arguing that it was insufficient and that a deduction for development cost was unlawful. The High Court examined whether the …
The petitioners, employees of Zilla Parishad schools in tribal and PESA areas, sought the benefit of the Ekstar (one‑step promotional) pay‑scale under Government Resolutions dated 06.08.2002, 14.08.2008 and 29.02.2024. The State of Maharashtra contended that earlier resolutions were not applicable …
Madhvashram College filed a writ petition seeking a decision on a pending proposal submitted to the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners, represented by Mr. Vinod B. Jadhav, argued that the State had unduly delayed consideration of the proposal. The State, represented by Mr. S.K. Tambe, AGP, …
A large number of writ petitions were filed by employees of Zilla Parishads seeking the benefit of the Ekstar (one‑step promotional) pay‑scale applicable to staff serving in tribal and PESA areas, based on Government Resolutions dated 06‑08‑2002, 14‑08‑2008 and 29‑02‑2024. The petitioners argued …
The petitioner, Ambadas Jotiba Pawar, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency, the petitioner informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. The Court’s resource personnel report dated 03‑07‑2026 confirmed this status. …
The petitioners, Shivaji Gundiba Khopade and others, sought compensation for land acquired by the Union of India and filed a civil application to condone a delay of 2,253 days in filing an appeal against the award of the Reference Court. They explained that financial hardship and lack of procedural …
Petitioners Ramdas Baliram Salunke and others filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of their nomination in the election of a trust. They argued that the rejection was illegal and sought relief from the High Court. The respondents submitted that after the election a change report had been …
The appellants Rukhmabai Uttam Mali and Prashant Yadav Ahire challenged the compensation awarded for their lands acquired for the Minor Irrigation Tank project in Jalgaon, seeking higher amounts. The Reference Court had awarded Rs 16 lakh per hectare for Bagayat land and Rs 8 lakh per hectare for …
The petitioners, Salman Khan, Samiulla Khan and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the District Collector’s failure to decide a representation dated 02‑02‑2026. The Court examined whether the delay infringed the petitioners’ rights. It held that the Collector …
The claimants owned 104 hectares of land in Khopegaon, Kanheri, Wasangaon and Latur that were acquired for a minor irrigation project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation based on rates of Rs.1.5-2.4 lakh per hectare, which the claimants challenged as inadequate, arguing the …
The petitioner, a college employee, was appointed in July 2015, tendered resignation in December 2015, and was later asked to rejoin in February 2016 but was prevented from signing the muster roll from May 2016. He filed representations seeking reinstatement, which were allegedly delayed by the …
The claimants, heirs of Turab Jamalsab Shaikh and others, filed civil applications seeking condonation of a 6,595‑day delay in filing appeals against the State of Maharashtra concerning compulsory land acquisition for a project. The delay was explained by the applicants citing the COVID‑19 pandemic …
The petitioner, Shri Ganesh Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, sought leave to withdraw its writ petition filed under WP 3662 of 2014. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. J. B. Paikrao, applied before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, for withdrawal. The Court considered the application and, without any …
The applicant, Anil Jain, filed Criminal Application No. 5665 of 2014 and No. 899 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. The applicant's counsel submitted that the causes of action in both applications had become infructuous and there was no need for the matters to …
The claimants, whose land was compulsorily acquired for a project, filed applications seeking condonation of a 6,595‑day delay in filing their appeals. They explained the delay by citing the COVID‑19 pandemic and their financial difficulties. The Court examined whether such an extensive delay could …
The appellant's land was acquired under a notice issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. The Special Land Acquisition Officer classified the land into three categories, but the Reference Court treated the entire parcel as semi‑irrigated and awarded compensation accordingly. Dissatisfied …
The petitioner, Jamnabai Gangaram Gite, filed a writ petition challenging Order Exhibit‑41 passed by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Hingoli. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the underlying Regular Civil Suit No. 182/2012 had been fully disposed of by the trial court on 14 June 2023. …
The petitioners filed a criminal revision application challenging an earlier criminal proceeding. Both parties engaged in court‑ordered mediation, and a settlement was reached with the mediator’s assistance. The court noted that the settlement extinguished the cause of action underlying the …
The petitioners filed a criminal revision application challenging an earlier order. Both parties engaged in court‑ordered mediation, and a settlement was reached with the mediator’s assistance. The court noted that the settlement extinguished the cause of action underlying the revision. …
Devidas Ambadas Jadhav and another filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court seeking condonation of a 717‑day delay in filing a cross‑objection related to land acquisition by the State of Maharashtra. The applicant argued that, as claimants whose lands were being acquired, the delay …
Petitioner Sakharm Raghunathrao Kulkarni filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking leave to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to pursue any alternate remedy. The petitioner, through Advocate R.B. Magare, requested the court's permission for such …
Jayshree Maroti Hake filed a writ petition (No. 8567 of 2015) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Shantabai Dnyanoba Hake and others. The petition remained pending for an extended period, spanning over a decade. Respondent No.1, through counsel Mr. Shailendra S. Gangakhedkar, argued …
The petitioner, Jai Malhar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction that the State of Maharashtra decide a proposal dated 04/09/2018, which had been recommended by the Commissioner. The petition alleged that the State had failed to act on the …
The claimants appealed the 2009 judgment and award of compensation for lands acquired for the Kolsur Medium Project, seeking a higher rate of Rs.3,212 per R on the principle of parity. The court examined whether the lands in the present appeals were acquired for the same purpose, under the same …
Ravindra Hirnalal Madavgate filed Writ Petition No. 5160 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel, Adv. Patil Indrale Anand Vinayakrao, filed a Vakalatnama, resulting in the discharge of …
The applicants filed a criminal application seeking the appointment of counsel after their dispute was settled through a divorce decree dated 05.01.2026. Both parties, represented by their respective advocates, informed the court that the divorce petition had been decreed and that there was no …
The petitioner, Balaprasad Purushottam Kurpatwar, filed a contempt petition against the respondents. The respondents complied with a prior order issued by the High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, moved the Court to withdraw the contempt petition on the ground of compliance. The Court …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order that condoned a 47‑year delay in filing an appeal before the Deputy Director of Land Records. While the appeal was allowed on 29 January 2026, the petitioners sought to record this development and amend their pleadings. The court allowed the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order that condoned a 17‑year delay in filing an appeal before the District Superintendent of Land Records, which was eventually allowed on 29 January 2026. The petitioner then moved a civil application to record these developments, seeking to …
The petitioners, including Abhijeet Uttamrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15 January 2021 issued by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Latur, in Appeal No.129/2018. Both parties agreed that the matter required remand to the Commissioner for further consideration. The High …
The High Court of Bombay heard a massive group of appeals arising from a land‑acquisition proceeding for the Katpur minor‑irrigation project in Latur, where claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the reference court and the acquiring body (the State) contested the same award. The claimants …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of arbitration applications filed by various contractors seeking extensions of the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29‑A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The applications were filed against the Project Director of the National …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The applicants and the respondent entered into a verified settlement deed, wherein the complainant agreed to withdraw the FIR and related criminal proceedings in exchange for a monetary settlement and mutual consent divorce. The court examined the registrar's verification report and the terms of the …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The petitioners filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents violated an interim status‑quo order issued in a writ petition. The writ petition was later disposed on 7 April 2011 after the parties reached a compromise, and the interim relief was vacated. The court examined whether any …
The petitioners, Kadam Pravin Vyankatrao and others, filed a writ petition and a civil application against the State of Maharashtra in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, the petitioners instructed their counsel, Mr. Sambhaji G. Munde, to withdraw the writ petition. The counsel …
The applicants, represented by Advocate A.S. More, sought leave to withdraw a civil application filed to bring the legal representatives of a deceased claimant on record, citing an inadvertent error in the pleadings that named the claimants as the appellants instead of the acquiring body. The High …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants, who were owners of 104 hectares of agricultural land, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The Acquiring Body filed a first appeal against a land acquisition award. During the appeal, respondent No.1‑F, Padmin Dashrath Jogdand, died, prompting a civil application to amend the appeal’s title clause to insert his legal representatives and delete his name. Similar applications were filed to …
The High Court of Bombay heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the reference court. The claimants argued that the land was …
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Ltd., the acquiring body, filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 273‑day delay in filing its first appeal against a 2019 award, a confirmation of a stay order, and permission for the original claimants to withdraw the amount …
The Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation (GMIDC) filed several stamp duty appeals against multiple respondents, many of whom were deceased. The corporation sought condonation of substantial delays—up to 2832 days—in bringing the legal heirs of the deceased onto the record and in …
Petitioner Minhaj Ahmed Taj Ahemed Hashmi filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition sought relief, but the respondent counsel submitted that the purpose of the petition had already been …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench considered several civil applications filed by Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation seeking condonation of delay in bringing legal heirs of deceased respondents and in filing stamp appeals. The court examined a delay of 2,832 days in …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants alleged that the award by the Special Land Acquisition Officer undervalued their land, which they contended was …
The Ka Krishnarao Narayanrao Pawar Education Trust filed a petition (1000 Cont. Petition No. 717 of 2025) against the State of Maharashtra challenging an order of contempt. The petitioner, through counsel, informed the court that the contempt order had been fully complied with. The court examined …
The High Court examined two related appeals concerning land acquired in 1993 for the Bruhat Minor Irrigation Tank project in Jalna district. The acquiring body challenged a 2010 award, while the original claimant contested a 2006 award and later filed a cross‑objection seeking enhanced compensation. …
The Kinwat Municipal Council filed an application seeking condonation of a 635‑day delay in filing a petition to set aside an abatement and to bring the legal representatives of respondent No.4 on record. The court noted that the matter originated in 2004, making the application over 22 years old, …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), through its Project Director, filed two civil applications seeking condonation of a 43‑day delay in filing arbitration appeals against the respondents. The respondents opposed the condonation, arguing that the delay was excessive and should not be …
Lokvikas Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. filed a criminal writ petition seeking registration of an offence against respondents 4 and 5 based on complaints made in 2020. The Court observed that the petitioner had been absent for five and a half years and had not given any instructions to counsel. The lack …
The appellant, Priyanka Vinod Bhagat, was arrested for the alleged murder of her husband, accused of colluding with a co-accused due to an alleged illicit relationship and a property dispute. The prosecution relied on statements of the deceased's sister, delayed recordings, and the fact that 28 …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a consolidated group of first appeals arising from a land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. The claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The claimants appealed for enhancement of compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Kolsur Medium Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. They argued that, since their lands were acquired for the same purpose, under the same notification and by the same reference court as in First Appeal …
The applicant, Yogesh Navnath Karande, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. The court expressed its disinclination to entertain the revision. Upon the court’s indication, the applicant’s counsel sought …
The claimants, owners of 104 hectares of land in Khopegaon, Kanheri, Wasangaon and Latur, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for a minor irrigation project, arguing that the land was irrigated and the rate of Rs.4,00,000 per acre was inadequate. The State …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The petitioners sought a direction to join several criminal cases (Crimes Nos. 12/2015, 103/2016, 270/2017, 110/2015) with a private proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a joint trial. The respondents informed the Court that separate trials were already underway in …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, alleging that the lands …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (landowners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court, …
The petitioner, Akash Jagdish Sharma, filed a contempt petition (Cont. Petition No. 402 of 2019) before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order under contempt had been complied with. Consequently, the petitioner argued that there …
The petitioners filed a civil suit seeking fixation of boundaries and recovery of possession of agricultural land adjoining the respondents' land. During the suit they applied to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 to add a brother as a plaintiff and to alter the description of the suit property …
The petitioners, Somnath Dattatraya Malnath and another, challenged a communication dated 15 May 2026 issued by the Deputy Director of Education of Maharashtra, arguing that it was improperly based on a letter dated 28 May 2025 from the Director of Education. The High Court, referring to its earlier …
The petitioner, appointed as a Mistry on 1 April 1981, claimed entitlement to two promotions under the Assured Career Progression Scheme after completing twelve years of service, first in October 1994 and again after a second twelve‑year period as per a government decision dated 20 July 2001. He …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (landowners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The Bombay High Court heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and enhanced by the Reference Court, arguing …
The High Court heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition for the Katpur minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were taken from several villages. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the reference court, arguing that the land was irrigated and …
The State of Maharashtra filed a civil application seeking modification of a May 7, 2026 order in Writ Petition No. 4647, requesting that the amount it must deposit be reduced from Rs.1,50,00,000 to Rs.1,13,36,615. The court examined the award and found that the respondents were entitled only to …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The claimants owned 104 hectares of land in Khopegaon, Kanheri, Wasangaon and Latur that were acquired for a minor irrigation project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation based on rates of Rs.1.5‑2.4 lakh per hectare, which the claimants challenged as inadequate, seeking Rs.20 …
The petitioners, Manisha Mukund Naik and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18 January 2020 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad in RCS No. 23 of 2018. They contended that the civil suit (RCS No. 23 of 2018) had already been decreed, rendering the order moot. …
The applicant, a Gramsevak, was charged with offences under IPC sections 417, 420, 465, 468, 471, 409 read with Section 34 for allegedly diverting funds of the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana scheme by creating bogus beneficiary profiles and facilitating disbursement to dummy individuals. He filed an …
The Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation (GMIDC) filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing stamp duty appeals and in bringing the legal heirs of deceased respondents on record. The court examined whether the substantial delays—up to 2832 days—could be …
The petitioners filed three civil applications seeking an early date of hearing for appeals pending since 2013 concerning compensation claims against the State of Maharashtra. The applications were filed before the High Court at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The Court examined the request and noted the …
The petitioners filed three civil applications seeking an early date of hearing for appeals pending since 2013 concerning compensation claims against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court noted that the appeals had been pending for an extended period and required a definitive schedule for final …
The petitioner, Sarika Yuvraj Patil, filed a writ petition (No. 3974 of 2016) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was pending for an extended period. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that, due to the efflux of time, the petition had become infructuous. The court …
Narottam Raghunath Patil filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the State of Maharashtra's failure to decide his pending application under Section 21 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement …
The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 26‑day delay in filing their first appeal. The court examined the application and noted that the delay was neither deliberate nor intentional. Considering the interest of justice, the judge held that the delay could be condoned. …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
Petitioners Babasaheb Ramhari Tribhuvan and others filed a writ petition seeking a direction that Respondent No.2, the State of Maharashtra, decide the representation submitted by the petitioners on 10 February 2025 on its merits. The Court examined whether the State was obligated to consider the …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a group of appeals arising from the acquisition of 104 hectares of land for the Katpur minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court, arguing that the …
Petitioner Prafull Vithalrao Dhole filed a contempt petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The respondents complied with the earlier order of the Court. The petitioner's counsel moved that, in view of compliance, the contempt petition be withdrawn. The Court considered the motion …
The case involved a large group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares of agricultural land were acquired. Claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the …
The petitioner, Rohidas Tulsidas Gange, filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. After hearing, the court indicated it was not inclined to grant the relief. The petitioner's counsel then requested permission to withdraw the petition. The court granted the …
The applicant, Kanaiyyalala alias Kanha Jagdishchandra Jat, was arrested for offences under Sections 20 and 20(b) of the NDPS Act after Ganja was discovered in his vehicle and he fled the scene of an accident. He filed a bail application, arguing that the charge‑sheet had been filed, the …
Itesh Hasmukhlal Jain applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR 285/2025 alleging offences under IPC sections 403, 409, 420, 120‑B and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. The prosecution alleged that Jain obtained a Rs 50 lakh loan without security, …
The petitioner, Vikas Raosaheb Dandge, filed a writ petition (No.3515 of 2018) against the State of Maharashtra and others. During the pendency of the case, the petitioner’s counsel was elevated to the position of a High Court Judge. The Court observed that, owing to the passage of time, the …
The petitioners filed a civil application to bring the legal heirs of the original claimant, Dagadupant Baliram Jadhav, on record, despite a delay of 1,673 days, which they explained in the application. The court examined whether such a long delay could be condoned for the purpose of adding the …
The petitioners filed a civil application to bring the legal heirs of the original claimant, Dagadupant Baliram Jadhav, on record, despite a delay of 1,673 days, which they explained in the application. The court examined whether such a long delay could be condoned for the purpose of adding the …
The appellant Babulal Badgujar appealed against a trial court acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran. The High Court, after …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained several first appeals filed by various appellants against the State of Maharashtra. The matter before the court was a request to correct typographical errors in an order dated 24‑03‑2026, specifically the survey number of land (incorrectly …
Shivraj Hanmant Ambulge filed a writ petition (No. 4935 of 2025) before the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, seeking relief concerning a representation he had submitted on 5 January 2024. The representation remained pending with Respondent No.3, prompting the petitioner to approach the …
The claimants, owners of 104 hectares of agricultural land in Khopegaon, Kanheri, Wasangaon and Latur, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for a minor irrigation project, alleging the lands were irrigated and the award was too low. The State (acquiring body) …
The petitioner, a party‑in‑person, sought recall of a judgment dated 25 February 2026 that dismissed a series of writ petitions for want of prosecution, on the ground that his repeated absences were due to personal difficulties and not intentional. The court had previously noted his absence since …
The accused Ramesh Bhagwan Munde and Amol (applicants) were convicted of murder, abetment of suicide and a common intention offence under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. They filed a bail application claiming procedural irregularities such as a discrepancy in …
Shaikh Shafiulla Badshaha filed a contempt petition (No. 121 of 2010) against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through Adv. Vikrant Valse and Adv. T. M. Venjane, submitted that the order under contempt had been complied with. The court, after considering the submission, found …
The petitioners, through their counsel Mr. Pathan Mohammad Kaif on behalf of Mr. S. S. Kazi, sought to withdraw Writ Petition No. 5500 of 2014 (along with related petitions 5555 and 5592 of 2014). The Court entertained the request and ordered that the writ petitions be dismissed as withdrawn. No …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The case involved a large group of land‑acquisition appeals concerning 104 hectares of land in Latur district acquired for a minor irrigation project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the Reference Court was far too low and …
The applicants filed a criminal application (No. 1085 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Their counsel submitted a written instruction dated 31.03.2015 requesting the withdrawal of the application. The court recorded the instruction and considered the request. The judge granted …
Vasudeo Dhondiram Pujari appealed under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1849 against the State of Maharashtra. The appellant sought to bring his legal heirs on record, and the court allowed a civil application to condone the delay, set aside any abatement, and permitted amendment to include …
The case involved a group of land‑acquisition appeals concerning 104 hectares of land in Latur district acquired for a minor irrigation project. Claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the Reference Court was inadequate, asserting the …
The appellant, Vasu Deo Dhondiram Pujari, filed a first appeal under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1849, seeking relief after a Special Civil Suit No. 323/1991 was partially decreed and a regular civil appeal (No. 483/2012) was pending. A separate civil application (No. 10727/2026) was …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (the owners of 104 ha of agricultural land) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (landowners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court, arguing …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed the judgment and award dated 24 September 2013 of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad, which had enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases. The appellant argued that the enhanced compensation exceeded four times the …
The High Court heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court, while the acquiring body contested the same award as …
The Bombay High Court heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed …
The petitioner, Tarachand Yamaji Mitkar, filed a writ petition (902 WRIT PETITION NO. 14457 OF 2023) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The respondent State was represented by Shri S. R. Wakale, Additional Government Pleader. On 14 …
The claimants owned 104 hectares of land acquired for a minor irrigation project in Latur and challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, alleging it was too low and that the land was irrigated, warranting a higher rate. The acquiring body appealed, contending the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order (Exhibit-57) issued by the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jafrabad in Regular Civil Suit No.15 of 2014. The petitioners contended that the civil suit had been withdrawn on 30 April 2026, rendering the order moot. The Court examined the …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal revision (Application No. 97 of 2018) challenging an order dated 9 January 2018 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Majalgaon, which had allowed the discharge of accused Nos. 3 and 4 in Sessions Case No. 38/2016. During the pendency of the revision, the main …
M/s. Rajmudra Real Estate Pvt Ltd. filed a contempt petition (No. 206 of 2012) arising out of Writ Petition No. 4792 of 2011. The petitioner argued that the main writ petition had been disposed, leaving no surviving cause of contempt. The Court examined whether the contempt petition could continue …
Vijay Rajayya Dubba filed writ petition No. 6111 of 2021 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Anusuya Chandrakant Dubba and others. The petition was listed for urgent orders on 27 January 2026, but the petitioner failed to appear. The court again listed the matter on 2 …
The petitioner, Md. Abdul Hadi, claimed that the Chief Officer of Beed Municipal Council illegally dumped garbage on his land (Gut No.125) after exhausting space in a neighboring plot. He alleged that the dumping began around 2021, filed complaints with the municipal officer and police, and sent a …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (landowners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The applicant, Datta, filed an application seeking condonation of an 846‑day delay in filing a first appeal against the judgment of the lower court. The respondent states were represented by an Additional Government Pleader, while the acquiring body was not present despite service. The court …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a mass of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants alleged that the award of Rs 4,00,000 per acre for dry land (and higher rates for irrigated land) was inadequate and that they …
The Bombay High Court dealt with several pending civil applications arising from a second appeal filed in 1980. Application No. 3382 of 2025 was held infructuous after the applicant deposited the required costs of Rs.15,000 and was accordingly dismissed. Application No. 4739 of 2025, filed for …
The petitioners challenged the fixation of their one‑step pay (Ekstar) on the ground that it was not in accordance with the recommendations of the 6th and 7th Pay Commissions. They had submitted a detailed representation on 9 March 2026 to the concerned authority, which remained pending. The Court …
Ramrao Bhairavnath Kadambande and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Sarpanch Grampanchayat Ranmala. The petitioners later approached the court requesting permission to withdraw the writ petition. The learned counsel for the …
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay entertained a motion seeking to amend the order dated 18 April 2026. The petitioner requested that, in paragraph five of the order, the words “except in Writ Petition No.10800/2021 and Petitioner in Writ Petition No.10800/2021” be inserted after the …
Mahadev Pratap Khedkar filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking permission to withdraw the application while retaining the right to file a fresh one after a charge-sheet is filed, if necessary. The learned counsel for the applicant made this request. The …
Petitioner Dawoodkhan Abdulha Khan filed a writ petition (No. 4762 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. On 31 August 2026, the petitioner's counsel was absent, and no representative appeared on the scheduled date of 7 September 2026. The court noted the continued absence of …
The appellants, Anil B. Katariya, appealed against the acquittal of Vijay B. Kale in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They sought transfer of the appeals to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran …
Anil Katariya appealed the acquittal of Vijay Kale in multiple criminal appeals under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellants, through counsel, invoked the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to seek transfer of the appeals to the District and …
Suresh Tukaram More filed a continuous petition (No. 545 of 2016) arising out of WP/8247/2013 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner alleged that the State of Maharashtra had not complied with an earlier contempt order. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that …
The petitioner, Bhausaheb Rangnath Shelar, challenged a revision order dated 12‑12‑2022 that upheld a Tahsildar’s decision in an easementary suit concerning an 18‑foot road to Dhaman Vasti. Respondents 3‑8 had applied under section 5(2) of the Mamlatdars’ Courts Act, 1906 seeking removal of an …
The claimants, Ashok Gaba Patil and others, filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw a portion of the sum deposited by the Special Land Acquisition Officer in the court. They relied on earlier orders in related applications where the court had allowed withdrawal of 60% and 75% of …
The petitioners, a public trust, challenged a February 2018 order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Shrigonda, which rejected their application to recast issues that had previously been decided in their favour in a suit (R.C.S. No.236 of 2006). The trial court had originally answered Issue 1 …
The applicant filed an application seeking condonation of a 384‑day delay in filing a first appeal. The delay was attributed to the applicant being hospitalized and bedridden, and it was asserted that the delay was not deliberate. The court examined the reasons provided and found them sufficient to …
The petitioners, Muktaram Gitaram Mule and others, paid the full amount of Rs. 25,000 and reported that respondents 4 to 7 had settled the dispute. They moved the court seeking leave to withdraw their writ petition. The court considered the request and, finding no impediment, granted leave to …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kashinath Kale, was directed by the High Court to deposit a decreetal amount with the executing court in two installments by 20 July 2015. The petitioner failed to make the required deposits and did not apply for any extension of time. The Court noted the non‑compliance and …
The appellants challenged the judgments and awards of the Joint Civil Judge in two land acquisition references concerning land taken for the Waghur Project. They sought enhanced compensation rates for Bagayat, Jirayat and Potkharab lands and a higher valuation for fruit‑bearing trees, as well as …
The applicant, Pramanand Narayan Timmewar, filed an anticipatory bail application for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to alleged property damage. The FIR did not name him, and he had earlier been granted interim bail on the condition of cooperating with the investigation, having …
The applicant, Digambar Harishchandra Shinde, filed a criminal application seeking restoration of Writ Petition No. 740/2025, which had been dismissed because notice was not served on the respondents. The applicant's counsel, H. V. Patil, undertook to serve the respondents within two weeks and …
The application sought cancellation of bail granted to Bhanudas, the main accused in a murder case involving multiple IPC offences including murder, attempt to murder and grievous hurt. The complainant argued that the seriousness of the offence and the accused's role warranted revocation of bail, …
The applicant, Gangaram Vithoba Karande, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 24 of 2026 alleging assault with an axe during a long‑standing land‑dispute. The prosecution alleged that the applicant assaulted the complainant with a dangerous weapon, causing simple …
The appellants filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay, setting aside abatement, and permission to bring the legal representatives of deceased parties on record. The court examined whether the delays—ranging from 673 to 4,967 days—were deliberately caused, invoking Section 5 …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard three criminal writ petitions (Nos. 468, 469 and 470 of 2019) filed by Ashok, Pratap and Subhash respectively against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners submitted purshis dated 24‑02‑2020 stating that they had already received the …
The applicant, Shrikant Ramrao Deshpande, filed a criminal revision seeking to challenge a discharge order passed by the trial court. The applicant argued that the trial court had proceeded to pass a final judgment, rendering the revision unnecessary. The court noted that since the trial court was …
In a second appeal before the Bombay High Court, the appellant sought to delete the name of appellant No.1, who had died. The advocate argued that the deceased's daughters had sold half of their share in the disputed property to a third party, and that the sale should be held in suspense pending the …
The petitioners Vishnu s/o Bhagwan Pachpande (deceased) and others filed a writ petition (No. 4360 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against respondents Kashinath s/o Murlidhar Patil (deceased) and others. The petition sought relief, but during the hearing the petitioners, …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed against the judgment and award dated 24 September 2013 which enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases. The appellant argued that the enhanced compensation, though slightly above four times the Land Acquisition Officer's award, fell …
Yusufkhan Sikandar Khan filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the delay in deciding his representation dated 12 June 2025. The petition sought a directive for the State of Maharashtra, specifically respondent No.5, to adjudicate the representation. The …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed against the judgment and award dated 24 September 2013 which had enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases. The appellant argued that the enhanced compensation did not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition …
The petitioner, claiming to be the son of the late Navalbai, sought a heirship certificate for a house property. The trial court issued the certificate after a summary enquiry, finding no dispute over the relationship. Respondents contested, presenting evidence that Navalbai was the second wife of …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench considered two anticipatory bail applications filed by Ayaj Ajim Pathan and Shadab Rasid Tamboli in connection with Crime No. 283/2024, which alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act. The complainant, a 19‑year‑old girl, …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a compensation award of Rs 40,000 per acre for irrigated land acquired for the Benitura Medium Project, arguing that the amount was excessive. The claimants’ 2.5‑hectare irrigated land had originally been awarded Rs 14,000 per hectare, which the Reference …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for hearing in compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1), Chandigarh vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The petitioners sought to challenge the constitutional validity of Section …
The petitioners Bapanna Sidramappa Chiloba (deceased) and others filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking to amend the pleadings to include the legal heirs of petitioner No.1. The respondents, Tanaji Bhimrao Phutke and others, opposed the amendment. The …
The Jalgaon Shahar Mahanagar Palika Seva Nivritta Prathamik Shikshak Sangh filed a contempt petition (No. 259 of 2026) against Dnyaneswar Dattatray Dhere and others. The petition was being heard before a bench of Justices Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav. Counsel for the petitioner, on …
The applicants filed a civil application to record the legal representative of the deceased Indubai in a pending appeal concerning land acquisition. The first appeal had been filed by the acquiring body, and during its pendency the respondent Indubai died, necessitating substitution by his legal …
The petitioners, who are plaintiffs in a partition suit, challenged the trial court's framing of Issue No.1 which placed on them the burden of proving that the suit property is ancestral. They argued that, because the defendants claimed the property is self‑acquired, the burden should shift to the …
The cooperative society Chandrapandhari Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Patsanstha applied to the Bombay High Court for leave to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the applicant …
The petitioner, Sanjay Dattatray Sarode, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31 January 2020 passed by the Ad‑hoc District Judge, Sangamner, in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 22 of 2019. The petitioner sought a direction that the trial court should decide the pending suit, R.C.S. No. …
The Executive Engineer, as the acquiring body, appealed the judgment and award dated 24 September 2013 which enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases. The appellant argued that the enhanced compensation, though slightly above four times the Land Acquisition Officer's award, was …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed the judgment and award dated 24 September 2013 of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad, which enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases. The appellant argued that the enhanced compensation exceeded four times the amount …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed the judgment and award dated 24 September 2013 of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad, which had enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases. The appellant argued that the enhanced compensation exceeded four times the …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed against a 2013 judgment and award that enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases. The appellant argued that the enhanced compensation, though slightly above four times the Land Acquisition Officer's award, should not be challenged per a …
The applicant, Dinesh Ramchandra Misri, filed a criminal application seeking quashment of an FIR (No. 349 of 2015) and subsequent charge‑sheet for offences under IPC sections 363, 366‑A, 376(2)(f) and POCSO Act section 5, alleging kidnapping and sexual assault of a 15‑year‑old girl. The victim, now …
The petitioner, son of the late Lata Rangrao Deshpande, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking arrears of family pension for a freedom fighter who died in February 2019. The deceased had two wives; the first wife never claimed the pension, while the second wife was later nominated but died …
