APPLICATION ALLOWED
The Bombay High Court dealt with several pending civil applications arising from a second appeal filed in 1980. Application No. 3382 of 2025 was held infructuous after the applicant deposited the required costs of Rs.15,000 and was accordingly dismissed. Application No. 4739 of 2025, filed for …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant filed a civil application seeking recall of a conditional order dated 25.03.2026 that had directed the petitioner to furnish the current address of respondent No.3 or face dismissal for want of prosecution. The applicant argued that an office objection prevented the address from being …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2018 seeking directions to decide representation and hold an enquiry against a respondent. The case remained pending for several years and was adjourned at the petitioners' request in July 2018. The court observed that the petitioners had lost interest in …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, representatives of the deceased Limbraj Dattatraya Patil and Mangalbai, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 2,450‑day delay in filing their first appeal against a decree of the State of Maharashtra. The respondents, represented by the State, were served and appeared, …
DISPOSED OFF
Yashvant Nathu Rathod and another filed a writ petition (40 WRIT PETITION NO. 11176 OF 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the State of Maharashtra's failure to decide on their representations dated 30 January 2024 and 27 May 2024. The petitioners alleged undue delay in …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants, who are relatives of the husband, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash FIR No. 287/2023 and the charge sheet filed for offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. The complainant, the wife, alleged physical and mental abuse and a monetary …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, the late Mr. Motichand Tilokchand Bedmutha, had filed a writ petition challenging a 2015 order of the Maharashtra Revenue and Forest Department. After his death, the Osmanabad District Marathi Reporter Association resolved that its President, Secretary or Treasurer could represent …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants, Nitesh Vikram Jadhav and others, sought to quash FIR No. 89 of 2026 filed at Karmad Police Station for offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Both parties entered into a settlement, filing a joint compromise and affidavits from the injured persons, Shubham and Nana …
DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, which had enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The land, 2 hectares 71 R (27,100 sq m) in village Darewade, was initially awarded Rs 30,697, but on reference …
DISPOSED OFF
The Nanded District Central Co‑op Bank Ltd filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an action of the Divisional Manager of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. The petition sought relief against the insurer's decision, alleging violation of the bank's rights. The …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Ghanshayam Dattatraya Garad and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. The Court examined the petition and, without addressing the merits, granted the petitioners liberty to approach the State Level …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, a charitable trust and a social service organization, filed writ petitions seeking reimbursement of fees for the 25% of students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The respondents, including the Union of India, the Ministry of Education …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The Bombay High Court dealt with several procedural applications arising from Second Appeal No. 104 of 1988. An application to fix the final hearing date of the appeal was allowed, scheduling it for 11 September 2026. The Court condoned an 810‑day delay in filing an application to bring the legal …
Transfer to other court
The appellant, Laxman Murlidhar Dalvi, appealed an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), he sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court. The High Court, after …
DISPOSED OFF
The Chief Officer of the Municipal Council of Dharashiv filed a writ petition challenging the Civil Judge’s order rejecting the defendant’s application to amend his written statement in suit RCS No. 161/2023. The suit sought a declaration that a notice issued by the Municipal Council was void and an …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Umashankar Padmanabh Shettigar, filed Writ Petition No. 5506 of 2006 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging M/s Goodyear South Asia Tyres Pvt Ltd. The petition was listed for hearing on 13 July 2026, but the learned counsel for the petitioner was absent. The court …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant, Rushikesh Vachisht Langade, appealed against the denial of pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under IPC sections 64(2)(h), 64(2)(m), 118(1) and 352. The victim filed an affidavit stating she had no objection to bail and that the FIR was lodged due to a misconception, noting that the …
Transfer to other court
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for hearing in compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1), Chandigarh vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The petitioners sought to challenge the constitutional validity of Section …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appeal concerned land acquired in 2006 from a village for a public purpose, the same acquisition as in a prior case decided by this Court. The appellant claimed the land was dry and sought compensation for fruit‑bearing trees, while the State argued it was irrigated. Relying on the earlier …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results of about 7,880 candidates and their permanent debarment from future TET examinations. The State of Maharashtra and the …
DISMISSED
The Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation (GMIDC) appealed against judgments and compensation awards dated 29 April 2008 issued by an ad‑hoc District Judge in Latur concerning land acquisition cases (L.A.R. Nos. 746/2002‑749/2002). The appellants contended that the compensation …
DISMISSED
The appellants, Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation (Aurangabad and Latur), appealed the judgment and awards dated 29 April 2008 passed by the Ad‑hoc District Judge‑1, Latur, challenging the compensation awarded in land acquisition proceedings. They contended that the compensation …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Jyoti Nagnath Bablsure, filed a miscellaneous civil application concerning a matrimonial dispute with the non‑applicant, Nagnath Prabhakar Bablsure. During the pendency of the application, the parties amicably settled their dispute before the Family Court and filed a compromise pursis …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra issued resolutions on 1 April and 2 April 2026 disqualifying several private educational institutions from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordering the closure of their primary, secondary and higher‑secondary schools without affording any hearing. The institutions filed writ …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Sagar Madhukar Aute applied to the Bombay High Court seeking quashment of FIR No.169/2023 and the related criminal proceeding (R.C.C. No.669/2023) for offences under IPC sections 323, 498‑A, 504, 506 r/w 34. The parties, including co‑accused respondent No.2, settled the dispute amicably and …
DISMISSED
The Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation and its subsidiaries appealed the judgment and awards dated 29 April 2008 issued by the Ad‑hoc District Judge‑1, Latur, in several land‑acquisition reference cases (L.A.R. Nos. 746/2002‑749/2002). The appellants contended that the …
DISMISSED
The appellants, Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation and its subsidiaries, appealed against the judgment and awards dated 29 April 2008 passed by the Ad‑hoc District Judge‑1, Latur, concerning land acquisition compensation. They contended that the compensation enhancement by the …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Shaikh Sajjad Shaikh Rais, filed a criminal revision application (CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1382 of 2025) seeking to prosecute his wife. The parties subsequently reached a compromise in the Family Court, Parbhani, where the wife received a lump sum of Rs.5,50,000 and withdrew the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed applications seeking condonation of a 28‑day delay in filing first appeals against a 2001 judgment of the Jalgaon Land Reference Court concerning acquisition of land for a percolation tank. The appeals challenged the compensation awarded to the claimants, alleging that …
DISPOSED OFF
MerryGold Enterprises filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the authorized officer and others. The petitioner argued that the respondents had taken possession of the subject matter, rendering the petition ineffective. The respondents contended …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Manoj, a 40‑year‑old agriculturalist, was arrested for alleged forcible sexual intercourse with a 40‑year‑old woman (the informant) on 20 March 2026, under sections 64, 64(1) and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The informant claimed the accused entered her house, threatened her and her …
DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment dated 15 December 2004 in which the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar enhanced compensation for land acquired for a percolation tank. The claimants owned 26 R. and 91 R. of land acquired under a Section 4 notification in 1989 and had been …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Himayat Ali Sadat Ali Inamdar, filed writ petition No.4668 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order of the Additional Collector, Latur. The Additional Collector had already passed a final order in the matter, which was placed on record. Both parties …
Withdrawn
The petitioners, Dipak Dnyaneswar alias Nana More and another, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing, the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the bail application, seeking liberty to approach the trial court after a period of one year. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Mukunda Gokul Borse, filed Writ Petition No. 4868 of 2014 before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. H. A. Karad (and Mr. Hon Ashwin), argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court examined the submission …
DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment that enhanced compensation for land acquired in 1987 for a percolation tank. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially awarded a low amount, prompting the claimants to seek a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. The reference …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed an application seeking condonation of a 1,167‑day delay in filing its first appeal. The applicant argued that the delay was due to the time required to obtain sanction from the Law and Judiciary Department and was not deliberate. The court observed that no documentary …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court considered three bail applications filed by Shrihari Hardas Chavan, Nagesh Vikram Bhosale and Siddesh Sadish Kale in connection with a robbery and assault case (Crime No.63 of 2025) for which they had earlier been granted bail under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. After the prosecution …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, Shivani Irappa Adargunchi, filed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking the transfer of a Hindu Marriage Petition (judicial separation) filed by her husband from the Family Court at Nanded to the Family Court at Pune. The husband initially opposed the …
DISMISSED
The petitioner, Niyaz Mohammad Quadri, filed a criminal revision application (No. 31 of 2019) seeking to quash a judgment and decree dated 02.01.2018. The High Court had previously ordered that the application would be dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner's counsel. On the scheduled date, …
DISPOSED OFF
Niyaz Mohmmad Quadri filed a criminal revision application (No. 31 of 2019) seeking to quash a judgment dated 02.01.2018. The High Court had earlier warned that the application would be dismissed for non‑appearance of the applicant’s counsel. On the scheduled date, the applicant again failed to …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra issued resolutions on 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 disqualifying several private educational institutions from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordering the closure of their schools without any hearing. The institutions filed writ petitions challenging the resolutions on the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner challenged a show‑cause notice issued by the Commissioner (Revenue) under the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974, alleging that the Commissioner had no power to reopen a land‑transfer dispute after a final order had been confirmed in 1987. The land, …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra issued resolutions on 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 disqualifying several educational institutions from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordering the closure of their schools without affording any hearing. The affected institutions filed writ petitions challenging the validity of …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, members of the Mannervarlu community, sought recognition as a Scheduled Tribe and validation of their caste certificates. Their applications were previously rejected by the Scrutiny Committee, prompting multiple writ petitions. The Court noted that a related petition by Shankar s/o …
DISPOSED OFF
Ramchandra Venkatrao Jadhav filed a writ petition challenging an order-cum-direction issued by the Tahsildar of Biloli granting a right of way over his land. The petition relied on the decree of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Biloli in Suit No. 127 of 2021, which set aside the Tahsildar's order …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants filed a civil application seeking to set aside an order dated 9 April 2014 passed by the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court. The application was filed after a delay of 1,096 days. The court examined whether the delay was deliberate and, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against a judgment and award that enhanced compensation for 2.42 hectares of land acquired for a percolation tank from Rs.14,000 to Rs.1,35,000 per hectare. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had originally fixed …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner challenged the temporary injunction granted in a civil suit (Suit No.64 of 2023) and its subsequent confirmation, arguing that the suit was frivolous and the injunction should not have been issued. The injunction was granted on the basis of prima facie case, balance of convenience, …
Withdrawn
The petitioner, Shriram, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner wishes to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request for withdrawal. No substantive issues on the merits were …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sukhdeo Amrut Patil, filed Writ Petition No. 9073 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition remained pending for an extended period without any substantive developments. The petitioner’s counsel …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court considered three bail applications filed by Shrihari Hardas Chavan, Nagesh Vikram Bhosale and Siddesh Sadish Kale in connection with a robbery and assault alleged to have occurred on 24‑25 January 2025, for which they were initially charged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants, original claimants whose lands were acquired for the Borol Storage Tank project in Deoni (Kh), Latur, appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 seeking enhanced compensation. They relied on a prior judgment of this Court (25.03.2026) that had increased compensation …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered bail application No.825 of 2026 filed by Madhuri Ramchandra Pawar, accused of conspiring with three co‑accused to murder her husband. The prosecution alleged that Pawar had an illicit relationship with accused No.1, transferred Rs 10,000 to him, …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants, original claimants whose lands were acquired for the Borol Storage Tank project in Deoni (Kh), Latur, appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 seeking enhanced compensation. Earlier reference judgments had awarded Rs 990 per R for jirayat land and Rs 6,400 per R …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants, original claimants whose lands were acquired for the Borol Storage Tank project in Deoni (Kh), Latur, appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 seeking enhanced compensation. They relied on a prior judgment of this Court dated 25.03.2026, which had enhanced …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging alleged encroachments by certain individuals in the context of Gram Panchayat elections. The court noted that the term of the concerned Gram Panchayat had already expired, rendering the petitions moot. Consequently, the petitions were declared …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Jameel Khan Rasool Khan, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to the police officer of Kranti Chowk Police Station to execute a conviction warrant issued by the JMFC 16th Court on 08.02.2016. The petitioner alleged that the police officer was not complying with the …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra sought condonation of a 66‑day delay in filing a criminal revision against the Special Judge’s order discharging Raju Bhagwan Jadhav, who was accused of accepting Rs 500 as a bribe for issuing a duplicate transfer certificate while employed as a teacher in an unaided private …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a contempt petition alleging that the authorities violated interim orders restraining mutation of a disputed property. They claimed that despite the prohibition, the Deputy Superintendent of Land Records effected mutation in the property card. The court noted that the main writ …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellant challenged a 2016 judgment and award in a land acquisition case, alleging that he was not served notice after the reference was transferred from Aurangabad to Vaijapur and therefore could not present evidence. The court noted that the appellant and his lawyer were absent after the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Vilas Prabhakar Chaudhari, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 20.01.2023 passed by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge in a Hindu Marriage Petition (No.174 of 2019). The High Court noted that the underlying marriage petition had already been disposed of on 08.04.2024, leaving no …
DISPOSED OFF
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., through its authorized signatories, filed first appeals against awards granted by Motor Accident Claims Tribunals in Osmanabad, Ahmednagar, and Beed. The insurance company subsequently submitted withdrawal pursis and an authority letter, indicating its acceptance of …
DISPOSED OFF
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., through its authorized signatories, filed first appeals and civil applications challenging awards passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunals in Osmanabad, Ahmednagar and Beed. The insurer later submitted withdrawal letters and an authority letter dated 25.03.2026, …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Dnyaneswar Kacharu Todmal filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash a communication dated 15 June 2020 issued by the Superintendent of Police, Ahmednagar, and to obtain sanction for prosecuting the police officers involved, based on his earlier application dated 30 April 2020. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Swami Vivekanand Yuvak Pratishthan, filed a writ petition seeking reimbursement of fees for 25% of students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The petition alleged that the State of Maharashtra, through the School Education Department, …
Withdrawn
The appellant, Devgiri Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Jugalkishore Rameshwaji Dayma. The appellant's counsel submitted a written communication from the client indicating a desire not to prosecute the matter further. The …
DISMISSED
The Union of India and Central Railway appealed against a common judgment and award dated 09‑10‑2023 that fixed compensation for land acquired for a new railway line at Rs 4,762 per R, alleging the rate was excessive and the statutory benefits were illegal. The respondents, who were the claimants, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, who had been awarded the Adarsh Shikshak Puraskar, claimed that they were entitled to an additional increment under Government Circular dated 12.12.2000, which had not been granted by the respondents. The petitioners sought a direction for the respondents to provide the advance …
Transfer to other court
The appellant, Baburao Hanmantrao Dabadwar, appealed an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He sought to have the appeal transferred to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025). The High …
DISMISSED
The Union of India and Central Railway appealed against a common judgment and award dated 09.10.2023 that fixed compensation for land acquired for a new railway line at Rs. 4,762 per R, alleging the rate was excessive and the statutory benefits were unlawful. The respondents, comprising numerous …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, in Civil Application No. 5648 of 2017, directed the applicant to furnish a copy of the present applications within two weeks of the order. The court warned that failure to comply would result in the applications being dismissed without further reference. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, who had been awarded the Adarsh Shikshak Puraskar, claimed they were entitled to an additional increment under Government Circular dated 12.12.2000, but the increment had not been granted. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and the Zilla Parishad, failed to take …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …
Withdrawn
Santosh Badranarayanji Bhandari filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant, through counsel, later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application and requested liberty to file a fresh …
DISMISSED
The Union of India (Central Railway) appealed against a common judgment and award dated 09‑10‑2023 that fixed compensation for land acquired for a new railway line in Beed district at Rs 4,762 per R, deeming it excessive. The appellants argued that the Reference Court exceeded its jurisdiction, …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Shrikant Shiwappa Kotiwar, filed a civil application seeking permission to amend the prayer clause of his writ petition, to condone a delay, and to have an earlier order dated 02.02.2026 quashed. The High Court examined whether such amendment and condonation were permissible under …
DISPOSED OFF
In Criminal Appeal No. 298 of 2026, the appellants sought relief against the State of Maharashtra. Appellants 2 and 3 withdrew their appeal and the court dismissed their proceedings. Appellant 1, Dipak Jankiram Adane, applied for pre‑arrest bail for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the …
DISMISSED
The appellant, Jijabai, appealed the acquittal of Rameshwar under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and IPC offences alleging that on 6 March 2016 the accused verbally abused her caste and attempted to force her onto his motorcycle, constituting outraging modesty. The trial court had …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Krushna Pundlik Sangle, filed a bail application before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The Court indicated a disinclination to grant bail. The applicant's counsel then sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to file a fresh bail …
DISMISSED
The High Court examined two related appeals concerning land acquired in 1993 for the Bruhat Minor Irrigation Tank project in Jalna district. The acquiring body challenged a 2010 award, while the original claimant contested a 2006 award, both seeking higher compensation. The court evaluated five sale …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner challenged a February 2020 order of the Joint Civil Judge, Bhusawal, which allowed the respondents to lead secondary evidence of an alleged sale agreement dated 08‑08‑2005 in a suit for specific performance. The petitioner argued that the agreement was unregistered, insufficiently …
Rejected at Admission stage
The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Project Majbutikaran Division, Osmanabad sought condonation of a 2,789‑day delay in filing its first appeal against a 2014 land‑acquisition award. The applicant argued that as a state‑owned corporation it required government sanction of funds for court fees, which …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Anita and Uddhav Mamadge, directors of Manjara Seeds Pvt. Ltd., applied for bail in a case alleging fraud involving soybean processing and non-payment to farmers. The prosecution alleged that the company, managed by Hanmant Mamadge (the accused who is now absconding), accepted soybean, processed it …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, a 65‑year‑old agriculturist, was arrested for the death of Jamil, who was electrocuted after contacting an electric fence installed on the applicant's field. The FIR charged the applicant under Section 105 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which deals with culpable homicide not …
Rejected at Admission stage
The Executive Engineer of the Irrigation Project, Majbutikarann Division, Osmanabad filed Civil Application No. 6971 of 2022 against Dhenu Lalu Rathod. The applicant sought relief, but a related delay application was pending. The Court first considered the status of the delay application. Upon …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The accused, Sachin Narsu Chaughule, was previously released on bail for offences under Sections 354-A, 354-B, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 8, 12 of the POCSO Act, but failed to appear, leading to a non‑bailable warrant. He applied for bail again, claiming the need to earn a livelihood and …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants, Harish @ Nandu Sitaram Lahamage and another, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the charge sheet was filed against them. The applicants, through counsel Mr. G.R. Syed, sought permission to approach the Sessions …
Withdrawn
Dr. Anand Gorakh More filed an application seeking cancellation of his bail. The applicant's counsel, on instructions, requested leave to withdraw the application. The Hon'ble Court considered the request and granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the application for cancellation of bail was …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimants filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 534‑day delay in filing their appeal. Notices were issued; the respondents’ counsel appeared for Respondents 1 and 2, while Respondent 3 did not appear. The applicants explained the reasons for the delay in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the …
DISPOSED OFF
Smt. Sakkarbai Shrinivas Sarda filed a writ petition seeking direction to the Collector and Superintendent of Excise in Ahilyanagar to implement a 2016 order of the Minister of State Excise concerning the renewal of her excise licence. The respondents produced letters and an order dated 24‑02‑2025 …
DISMISSED
The Godavari Urban Multi State Credit Co-operative Society Ltd initiated arbitration against four appellants for recovery of a Rs.24 lakh loan, resulting in an arbitral award of Rs.33,87,408 with interest. The appellants challenged the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, …
DISMISSED
The Godavari Urban Multi State Credit Co-operative Society Ltd initiated arbitration against four appellants for non‑repayment of a Rs 24 lakh loan. The Arbitral Tribunal awarded the society Rs 33,87,408 with interest, which the appellants challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Uttamrao Madhukar Sardar, filed a contempt petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra and other respondents failed to comply with a stay order that required his continued service as Junior Clerk and payment of his salary pending the disposal of a writ petition. The respondents, …
Withdrawn
The applicants, Vitthal Namdevrao Dhamnne and another, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They later sought permission to withdraw the bail application while retaining the liberty to approach the Sessions Court for relief. The learned Advocate for the …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Ganesh Apparau Chaudhari, mistakenly filed a criminal revision under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure instead of a criminal appeal. He sought the court's permission to withdraw the revision and be allowed to file the proper appeal. The bench examined whether such a …
DISPOSED OFF
Several doctors filed writ petitions challenging clauses 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.7 of a Government resolution dated 07‑08‑2012. The High Court had already decided the substantive issue in a common judgment dated 30‑07‑2026 in Writ Petition No. 1583 of 2025 and related petitions. A Special Leave …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Balaji Vitthalrao Kale, an Assistant Registrar, was convicted by a Special Court in Latur under Sections 7, 12 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding a bribe of Rs.5,000 to amend society bye‑laws. He contended that the bribe was actually taken by a subordinate …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged clauses 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.7 of a Government resolution dated 07‑08‑2012, seeking relief against the resolution. The High Court had already decided the substantive issues in a common judgment dated 30‑07‑2026 in writ petition No. 1583 of 2025 and related petitions. A …
DISPOSED OFF
The writ petitions filed by Dr. Shital Uttam Shende, Dr. Govind M. Kulkarni, Dr. Vidya Chandrakant Jadhav and Dr. Satish Shimpi challenged clauses 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.7 of a Government resolution dated 07‑08‑2012. The High Court had earlier decided the issue in a common judgment dated …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants Sunita Sunil Aadmane and others filed a civil application against the Division Manager of Chola Mandalam M.S. General Company Ltd. and another respondent. The matter was heard before the Hon’ble Judge Sachin S. Deshmukh at the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay. After …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, noted that a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) scheduled for 23 July 2026 was inadvertently delayed, leading to the civil application being mistakenly left for disposal. The court re‑listed the PIL for 28 July 2026, but it could not be heard, and …
DISMISSED
The petitioners, including Lalita Gauri, filed Criminal Application No. 1725 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The trial in the underlying criminal case had concluded with the acquittal of the petitioners. The petitioner's …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Aishwarya Smitesh Mane, filed a criminal application and later sought leave to withdraw it. The learned counsel requested the court's permission to withdraw the application. The bench, after considering the request, dismissed the criminal application as withdrawn. No substantive …
Transfer to other court
The appellant, Gumanchand Kamhaiyalal Mutha, appealed against an acquittal order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant sought transfer of the appeal from the High Court to the District …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of first appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra and by numerous claimants concerning compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project. The claimants sought enhancement of compensation from the original Rs.360‑400 per R to …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The husband filed a criminal application seeking to restrain his wife from withdrawing the maintenance amount he regularly deposits in the Family Court. The court condoned a 45‑day delay in filing and allowed the criminal application, ordering that the revision be registered. It directed that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, on 8 January 2026, issued an interim order concerning a large number of pending criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court extended the deadline for filing amendments by four weeks, granting a final …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants sought anticipatory bail in a criminal matter. The trial court had already filed and accepted a summary of the case. The informant had filed a protest petition, which remained pending. Counsel for the applicants argued that, given the acceptance of the summary, there was no …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, acquired land in Ghatsawali village for a new railway line and initially offered compensation of Rs 980‑1,180 per R. Claimants challenged this award, and the Reference Court enhanced the compensation to Rs 4,064 per R and granted statutory …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a contempt petition (No. 224 of 2008) alleging non‑compliance with a prior contempt order. The State of Maharashtra, as respondent, filed a civil application (No. 2588 of 2010) in the same matter. The petitioners, through Advocate A. S. Bajaj, asserted that the contempt order …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court dealt with several pending civil applications arising from a second appeal filed in 1980. Application No. 3382 of 2025 was held infructuous after the applicant deposited the required costs of Rs.15,000 and was accordingly dismissed. Application No. 4739 of 2025, filed for …
DISPOSED OFF
Several doctors filed writ petitions challenging clauses 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.7 of a Government resolution dated 07‑08‑2012. The High Court had already decided the substantive issue in a common judgment dated 30‑07‑2026 in WP No. 1583 of 2025 and related petitions. A Special Leave Petition (C …
DISPOSED OFF
Ganesh Shankarlal Darak, a proprietor, filed a civil application (Writ Petition No. 2782 of 2024) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Commissioner of the Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar Municipal Corporation. The petitioner requested that the court permit amendment …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Court was approached to correct errors in its earlier order dated 28 April 2026, where the case number, party names, and a clause concerning the withdrawal of deposited money were incorrectly recorded. The applicant argued that Clause 2 mistakenly limited withdrawal to 50 % of the amount, …
DISMISSED
The appellant, Pramila Shivajirao Yellulwad, filed a family court appeal and two civil applications against her husband, Shivajirao Arjunrao Yellulwad. The respondent's counsel had offered to provide the appellant's address, but the court issued notice based solely on the address supplied by the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court heard a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment dated 27‑02‑2012 concerning compensation for lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project. The State appealed for interest on the compensation to be calculated from the Section 4 notification, while the claimants sought …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a series of civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing first appeals and permission to withdraw compensation amounts deposited by the acquiring body in land‑acquisition matters. The applicants contended that the delay was caused by …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed the compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project, while numerous claimants also appealed the same award. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially valued the dry lands at Rs 360‑400 per R, but the Reference Court enhanced …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed the award of compensation for lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project, while numerous claimants also appealed the same award. The original award, dated 24‑03‑2000, valued the land as dry at Rs.360‑400 per R, but the Claimants sought enhancement, …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of appeals by the State of Maharashtra and by claimants concerning compensation for lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially awarded Rs.360‑400 per R, classifying the land as dry, but the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against alleged criminal proceedings. The Court expressed disinclination to grant bail and, upon the petitioner's instruction, the application was withdrawn. Consequently, the …
DISMISSED
The appellant, Dr. Prajwalit Raut, filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court's Aurangabad Bench challenging a family court order. The court noted that the appellant failed to appear and that the notice issued to the respondent, Priyanka Raut, could not be served because the parties had resumed …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Yuvraj Dattu applied for anticipatory bail in a case where the deceased allegedly committed suicide after being threatened by the applicant, who was also accused of having an extra‑marital relationship with the deceased’s wife. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 108, 352, 351(2), 351(3) r/w …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a batch of civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing first appeals and permission to withdraw compensation amounts deposited by the acquiring authority in land‑acquisition cases. The applicants argued that the delay was due to …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Jyoti Bhimrao Pawar, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking protection from arrest. The court, after hearing, indicated it was not inclined to grant relief. Consequently, the applicant's counsel, on instructions, requested …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Pravin Vishwambhar Rayzude, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking protection from arrest. He first requested the court to place a copy of the charge sheet on record, which was granted. After hearing both sides, the court …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations was empowered under the 1998 Act and the 2010 Regulations to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of 7,880 candidates after verifying large‑scale mark tampering. The court found ample documentary and police evidence …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal writ petition challenging the trial court’s order rejecting its application under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) to examine a chemical analyser as a prosecution witness. The prosecution had earlier secured admission of the analyser’s …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, dealt with a massive group of appeals arising from a common judgment dated 27‑02‑2012 concerning land acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project. The State of Maharashtra appealed the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
These appeals arose from a common judgment dated 27.02.2012 of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sangamner, in a group of Land Acquisition Reference Applications concerning lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project. The State had acquired the lands under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench heard a massive group of appeals challenging a 2012 judgment of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sangamner, which had enhanced compensation for lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project. The State of Maharashtra contended that the Reference …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, dealt with a massive Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) scandal in which marks of about 7,880 candidates were tampered with. The State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations cancelled the results of the affected candidates and …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra and by numerous claimants concerning compensation for lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project. The claimants sought enhancement of compensation from the original Rs.360‑400 per R to Rs.6,00,000 per …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench entertained a batch of civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing first appeals and permission to withdraw compensation amounts deposited by the acquiring body after land acquisition. The applicants argued that delays were due to procedural …
DISPOSED OFF
Vinod Premchand Mahatole filed writ petition No. 2715 of 2022 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against Ramchandra Baganlal Mahatole and others. The petition remained pending for admission as the petitioner failed to appear in both morning and afternoon sessions. On 23 April 2026 the court …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner sought correction of her date of birth in school and college records, alleging a clerical error that listed her birth date as 01-07-1987 instead of the correct 09-04-1989. The Education Officer rejected the correction on the ground that, under Clause 26.4 of the Maharashtra Secondary …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a mass of appeals arising from a common judgment dated 27‑02‑2012 concerning land acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro‑Electric Project. The State of Maharashtra sought to uphold the Special Land Acquisition Officer's original award of Rs 360‑400 per R, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 04.04.2016 of the Secretary, Respondent No.1, which dismissed the petitioner's revision concerning a mutation entry. The petitioner argued that the dismissal was erroneous. The Court examined the nature of mutation entries and …
DISPOSED OFF
The New India Assurance Company filed a first appeal (No. 966 of 2012) against an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aurangabad, concerning the apportionment of a claim amount. The appellant, through Advocate A.S. Usmanpurkar, submitted a withdrawal petition with the requisite authority …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed the compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project, seeking interest from the date of the Section 4 notification, while the claimants appealed for enhanced compensation and interest from the date of the award. The Reference Court had …
DISPOSED OFF
The New India Assurance Company filed First Appeal No. 964 of 2012 before the National Lok Adalat of the High Court at Aurangabad challenging an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aurangabad, regarding the apportionment of a claim amount. The appellant, represented by Advocate A.S. …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Jitendra Punamchand Soni, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, his counsel sought permission to withdraw it so that a fresh application could be filed. The sole issue before the court was whether the bail …
DISPOSED OFF
Ms. Shreya S. Battise filed a First Appeal challenging an order passed by the Reference Court under Order VII, Rule 11(d) of the Civil Procedure Code. She later sought to withdraw the appeal and instead pursue a writ petition against the same order. The Court examined whether the appeal could be …
Transfer to other court
The applicant, Sai Equipment Pvt Ltd, filed an application seeking leave to appeal an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran, the applicant requested that the appeal be transferred to the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed the compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project, contending that the Reference Court erred in enhancing compensation and in granting interest from the Section 4 notification date. The claimants argued that, due to lack of sales …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment dated 27‑02‑2012 concerning land acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro‑Electric Project. The State of Maharashtra sought to uphold the Special Land Acquisition Officer’s original award of Rs 360‑400 per R, …
DISPOSED OFF
Mrs. Manisha Vitthal Parkad filed a criminal writ petition seeking the transfer of the investigation of Crime No. 51 of 2025, registered at Police Station Gangakhed, Parbhani, from the local police to the Criminal Investigation Department. The offences alleged were under Sections 103(1) and 238 of …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court heard a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment of the Reference Court concerning compensation for lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project. The State of Maharashtra sought to limit interest on compensation to that awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench dealt with a large group of appeals arising from a common judgment of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sangamner, concerning land acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project. The State of Maharashtra sought to uphold the original compensation of …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The State acquired lands at Ghatghar for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project, issuing a Section 4 notification on 18.03.1997 and passing the final award on 24.03.2000. The SLAO awarded compensation at Rs.36,000 to Rs.40,000 per hectare treating the lands as dry, and the Reference Court enhanced it …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard multiple first appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra and by claimants concerning lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project. The claimants sought enhancement of compensation from the original award of Rs.360‑400 per R, arguing that …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a minor represented by her father, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee to expedite the determination of his claim of belonging to the Koli Mahadev tribe. The claim had been pending since 29 May 2025, and the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, dealt with a large group of land acquisition appeals concerning the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project. The State of Maharashtra sought to uphold the original compensation of Rs.360‑400 per R, while the claimants argued that the lands were semi‑irrigated and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, Jyoti Chjandrabhan Pennewar and others, filed a cross‑appeal (ST.) No.12878 of 2025 and a related civil application No.8299 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Their counsel, Mr. V.D. Patnoorkar, stated that the applicants would waive any interest for the period …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners Vijaykumar Tarachand Rathod and Vitthal Shamrao Pawar filed contempt petitions seeking that the Director of Information & Technology grant them postings. The respondent submitted a communication dated 19 September 2019 stating that postings would be made as per availability. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Director of Tapi Patbandhare Vikas Mahamandal Jalgaon and other applicants filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against awards passed by the Reference Court in land‑acquisition matters. The applications were filed under various Fast Track …
Transfer to other court
The appellant, Siddhi Vinayak Shetkari Shet Majur Sevabhavi Sanstha Ltd, appealed against an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed contempt petitions seeking that they be given postings in the Department of Information Technology. The respondent, the Director of IT, submitted a communication dated 19 September 2019 indicating that postings would be made as per availability. The court examined whether any …
DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment and award dated 10 April 2000 of the Beed District Land Reference Court in favor of Govind Manikrao Kale. The State argued that a Government Resolution dated 3 November 2016, and its corrigendum dated 23 February 2017, directed that the State would not …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Director Tapi Patbandhare Vikas Mahamandal Jalgaon and others filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against awards of the Reference Court in land acquisition matters. The applications were heard before Justice S.G. Chapalgaokar, who examined …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, Trimbak Thanu Chavan and others, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 4,394‑day delay in preferring their first appeals. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra through the Collector/Special Land Acquisition Officer, contested the application. The Court examined …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant, Shriram General Insurance Co., appealed against an interim order of a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal directing it and a co‑respondent to pay Rs. 25,000 as no‑fault liability to the claimant. The insurer argued that the vehicle involved was not covered by its policy and that the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, Trimbak Thanu Chavan and others, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 4,394‑day delay in preferring their first appeals. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra through the Collector/Special Land Acquisition Officer, contested the application. The Court examined …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant, Shriram General Insurance Co., appealed against an interim order that directed it to pay Rs.25,000 as no‑fault liability to the claimant, Archana Somakant Bankar. The insurer argued that the vehicle involved was not covered by its policy and that the documents produced were …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Rajiv Palekar, challenged the cancellation of his Scheduled Tribe (ST) validity certificate by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee, arguing that the Committee lacked power to review its own earlier order and that his earlier invalidations were suppressed. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appeal filed by Bajaj Allianz General Insurance challenged a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs.49,06,412 to the heirs of Chandrabhan, who died after a motorcycle collision with a truck on 21‑12‑2010. The insurer argued that the truck (MH‑18‑M‑4652) was not involved, citing a delayed …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The acquiring body, after losing a land‑acquisition award, appealed the judgment and deposited the entire award amount, including costs and interest, with the court. The original claimants subsequently filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw 75% of the deposited sum, relying on a …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two contempt petitions—Petition No. 443 of 2024 (Dilip Kondappa Kinalkar v. Smt. Minal Karnwal) and Petition No. 312 of 2024 (Gorakh Annasaheb Rakh v. Shri Nitin Gadre). The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Shubham R. Swami and Mr. Mathpati S.K., …
DISMISSED
The applicant sought to have divorce proceedings pending before the Family Court in Pune transferred to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Rahata, or any other court within Ahmednagar district. The court noted that the applicant had concealed the material fact that she resides and works in Pune, …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, Rutuja Naresh Kamble, filed an application seeking the transfer of her marriage petition (No.97/2026) from the Civil Judge Senior Division in Kalyan, Thane, to the Civil Court in Beed. She alleged that she has no source of income, lives with her elderly mother, and the distance of …
Withdrawn
Akshay Shivaji Sapte filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking pre‑emptive bail against arrest in a criminal case instituted by the State of Maharashtra. The Court, after hearing, indicated it was not inclined to grant bail. Counsel for the …
Withdrawn
Vasant Shankarrao Kulkarni filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 575 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was presented before Judges Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav. At the request of the petitioner's …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Umesh Ramrao Kawale filed an application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking an early hearing of his leave to appeal against a conviction by the State of Maharashtra. The applicant was represented by Mr. Rajendra P. Phatke, while the State was represented by Mr. V. S. Badakh. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition alleging that their appeal and accompanying stay application filed on 24‑02‑2026 before the Deputy Director of Land Records (Respondent No. 6) had not been heard, while an order from Respondent No. 5 was scheduled for execution. The petitioners sought a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Kundlik Kisan Ghuge, filed a second contempt petition in 2013 alleging that a prior court order had not been complied with. The High Court had earlier allowed the petitioner to revive the contempt petition if the order was not fully complied with. After notice was issued in the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking quash of a notification dated 31 March 2022 issued by the Home Department, Maharashtra, which purported to introduce draft rules under Section 153 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The State, through its Advocate General, clarified that the …
DISPOSED OFF
Salim Khan Akbar Khan Pathan (Mulla) filed a civil revision challenging a decree of possession that had been passed by the trial court and affirmed by the lower appellate court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant at the hearing. The court examined whether a civil revision is an …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants challenged a compensation award for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act for the Lower Dudhana Project, arguing that the award was too low. They relied on nine sale instances of non‑agricultural land, particularly a 1994 sale of 186 sq m for Rs 7,000, to argue for a higher …
DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of two vendors, Gorakh and Mohan Marathe, who were charged under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for allegedly selling adulterated chilli powder. A food inspector collected a sample, and the public analyst’s report indicated the presence …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The claimants' lands in Dhavali village were acquired for a percolation tank and the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially fixed market values of Rs 48,000‑53,000 per hectare. Dissatisfied, the claimants accepted compensation under protest and sought a reference under Section 18 of the Land …
DISPOSED OFF
Ramesh Shivajirao Jadhav filed a criminal writ petition seeking registration of a crime against respondents 2 and 3. The petitioner did not appear before the court and failed to provide a copy of the petition to respondent 2, preventing notice. Additionally, the petitioner did not circulate the …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Omkar Shivaji Kamble, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act, alleging that he had repeatedly sexually assaulted his fifteen‑year‑old sister, resulting in pregnancy. The …
DISPOSED OFF
Mahadev Vinayak Anawane filed a contempt petition (No. 321 of 2012) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner, through Advocate D.R. Jaybhar, asserted that the order under contempt had been complied with. The respondents, …
DISPOSED OFF
Siemens Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 23 April 2013 issued by the Aurangabad Mathadi and Unprotected Labour Board that directed the company to pay Rs. 2,26,984. The petitioner contended that the Board had not afforded it a chance to be heard, violating the principles of …
DISMISSED
The appellant, Arun Punjaji Kadu, had taken a loan of Rs.2,00,000 from Kanhur Pathar Multi State Co‑op. Soc. Ltd. (respondent No.1) which was not repaid, leading to arbitration under Section 84 of the Multi State Co‑operative Societies Act, 1984. The first arbitral award dated 31‑03‑2013 was set …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant, Arun Punjaji Kadu, had taken a loan of Rs.2,00,000 from Kanhur Pathar Multi State Co‑op. Soc. Ltd. (a cooperative society under the MSCS Act). The first arbitration under Section 84 of the MSCS Act resulted in an award dated 31‑03‑2013, which was set aside by the Principal District …
DISPOSED OFF
Sudhir Dagadu Gatkal filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later requested permission to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the court was whether the petitioner …
DISPOSED OFF
Deelip Dattatraya Gore filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a grievance he had with the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner sought relief from the court, while the Attorney General for the State argued that the grievance could be addressed by the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Malan and another, filed a criminal writ petition seeking registration of an FIR based on a complaint dated 17 April 2020 alleging that Police Constable Mr. Salve had beaten them during a dispute involving the Thorat family. The police records showed that FIR No. 314/2020 was lodged …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Abhishek Vijay Bhagat filed a contempt petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra failed to complete a revenue survey of village Burhanagar by the court‑ordered deadline of 15 September 2023. The respondent State, through its AGP, submitted an affidavit stating that the survey was …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court considered two civil applications filed under Civil Application Nos. 5199 of 2025 and 5288 of 2025. Both applications arose out of parallel proceedings where the parties had earlier filed appeals against Orders 19 and 21 dated 2025. The Court examined whether any relief could survive …
DISPOSED OFF
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed a first appeal against a motor accident claim award but subsequently withdrew the appeal after accepting the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Latur (Petition No. 87 of 2010). The insurer deposited Rs.25,000 with the court and promised to deposit the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Ambrushi Shrirang Chavan and others, filed a contempt petition (No.336 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition alleged that an order of contempt had been issued against the …
DISPOSED OFF
In a regular civil suit filed in 2020 for possession of land allegedly encroached upon, the plaintiffs sought appointment of a Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code to measure the disputed parcels and produce a map showing encroachment. The defendants challenged this …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The High Court entertained two civil applications filed by the legal heirs of deceased claimants Nivarti Ramji Narhare and Ankush, seeking condonation of delay (618 days and 1,376 days respectively) and setting aside of abatement. The applicants produced heirship certificates issued by a competent …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Kashibai R. Nalawade and others, filed Writ Petition No. 8319 of 2018 before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The Court observed that a regular civil suit (No. 199 of 2014) concerning the same dispute …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a final award dated 13 September 2021 issued by respondent No.3. They argued that they have an alternate efficacious remedy under Section 34 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. The learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that …
DISPOSED OFF
The Godavari Khore Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation filed several applications for stay of proceedings in 2010, which remained pending for about fifteen years. No parties appeared for the applicant, and the respondent was represented by Additional Government Pleader S. G. Sangle. The …