DISMISSED
The appellants challenged the award of compensation for land acquired in 1987 for a percolation tank, arguing that the reference court erred in valuing the land at Rs 50,000 per hectare. The original award by the Special Land Acquisition Officer was Rs 160 per R, which was enhanced by the reference …
DISPOSED OFF
Uttam S/o Sahebrao Salve filed a contempt petition against Manukumar Srivastava. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. S.K. Mathpati and Mr. Sandeep B. Sontakke, submitted that the order of contempt had been fully complied with. The respondents, represented by Mr. S.J. Salgare, were not required to appear …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Mughda Rupesh Dharankar filed a civil application against Machindra Karbhari Dhamale and others. The applicant was represented by Mr. Rajendra L. Kute. The court examined the prayer clause "A" of the application and found merit in the relief sought. Accordingly, the High Court allowed the civil …
DISMISSED
The respondent, a driver employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, suffered multiple fractures in a road accident and received Rs.25,000 under the Motor Vehicles Act on a no‑fault basis. He also filed a claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Act for loss of earning capacity, …
DISMISSED
The respondent, a driver employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, suffered multiple fractures in a road accident and received Rs.25,000 under the Motor Vehicles Act on a no-fault basis. He also filed a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act for loss of earning capacity, …
Withdrawn
The appellants, Dhananjay alias Mahesh Sanjay Roham and others, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing, the appellant's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the appeal, citing the court's reluctance to interfere. He also requested liberty for the …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Examination Council was empowered to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of about 7,880 candidates after verifying large‑scale mark tampering, and therefore upheld the cancellation. However, the Court set aside the order permanently debaring the …
DISPOSED OFF
Janabai, the elected Sarpanch of Badnapur Gram Panchayat, was disqualified under Section 36 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act for allegedly failing to hold the required monthly meetings between March and July 2023. Respondents 3‑7 filed a dispute under Sections 7 and 36, and the District …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Bhagwan Narayan Nabde filed Contempt Petition No. 72 of 2014 alleging that the State of Maharashtra had failed to comply with a prior court order. The State, represented by the Additional Government Pleader Ms. U.S. Bhosale, argued that the alleged disobedience had been remedied by the …
DISPOSED OFF
Dr. Pramod Ranoji Shinde filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought relief and questioned the grant of interim protection. The Court observed that the matter was identical to the petitions decided in …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Krishna Uttamrao Shinde filed a writ petition (902 WRIT PETITION NO. 6394 OF 2023) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel, P. K. Ippar, argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The Court examined the claim of lapse and …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
An application (Civil Application No. 1703 of 2026) was filed seeking to fix a date for the final hearing of two second appeals. The court examined the reasons provided in the application. It allowed the application and ordered that the second appeals be listed for hearing on 16/04/2026. The court …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a complaint on 11 February 2025 alleging corruption and requested respondent No.2 to investigate. Respondent No.2, by order dated 28 August 2025, constituted a committee, with respondent No.4 as a member, to conduct the inquiry. The petitioners claimed that the inquiry remained …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra filed multiple first appeals challenging a common judgment and award dated 26 October 2010 that increased compensation for land acquired from various respondents. The reference court had enhanced the compensation from Rs.47,000 per hectare, as determined by the Land …
DISPOSED OFF
In a contempt petition filed by Abhaychand Govindji Shah against Prakash Mahajan and another, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that the respondents had complied with the earlier contempt order, as evidenced by an affidavit filed by Respondent No.1. The court examined the compliance claim and found …
DISMISSED
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a large number of pending criminal applications and writ petitions. The Court observed that many of these matters required amendment of pleadings. To give the parties a final opportunity, the Court extended the time for amendment by an additional …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, who are the original claimants in several civil applications, sought the court’s permission to withdraw the amount deposited by the acquiring body under a prior court direction. They relied on a previous order dated 17 April 2026 in Civil Application No. 4487 of 2026, which allowed …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed several civil applications seeking (i) permission to withdraw 80% of the amount deposited by the acquiring body, together with accrued interest, upon furnishing an undertaking, and (ii) condonation of delay in filing the first appeal by the acquiring body. The court relied on …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed several civil applications seeking permission to withdraw the amount deposited by the acquiring body and to condone delay in filing the first appeal. Relying on a prior order (Civil Application No.4487 of 2026) that allowed withdrawal of 80% of the amount with interest upon …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, who are original claimants in several civil applications, sought the court’s permission to withdraw the amount deposited by the acquiring body under a prior court direction. They relied on a previous order dated 17 April 2026 in Civil Application No.4487 of 2026, where the court …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed three civil applications seeking condonation of delay in preferring first appeals, acknowledging lapses in securing first orders and offering to forgo interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. The State respondents contested entitlement to interest and statutory …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, heirs of the deceased Dagdu Tukaram Suryawanshi and others, filed several civil applications seeking permission to withdraw the amount deposited by the acquiring body and to condone delay in filing first appeals. The court referred to its earlier order in Civil Application No. 4487 …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed several civil applications seeking permission to withdraw the amount deposited by the acquiring body and to condone delay in filing the first appeal. Relying on an earlier order (Civil Application No.4487 of 2026) that allowed withdrawal of 80% of the amount with interest upon …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants challenged the Civil Judge's award of Rs 53,000 per hectare for land acquired for a minor irrigation project, arguing that the valuation was not based on a comparable sale. The Reference Court had rejected their Section 18 references, deeming the adjacent‑village sale instances either …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants‑claimants challenged the Civil Judge’s award of Rs.53,000 per hectare for land acquired for a minor irrigation project, arguing that the valuation was based on an inappropriate ready‑reckoner rate and that a comparable sale from the nearby village of Rajmohi should be considered. The …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants claimed compensation for lands acquired for the Amlibari Minor Irrigation Project, challenging the Special Land Acquisition Officer's valuation of Rs 53,000 per hectare. They relied on a sale of agricultural land in the nearby village of Rajmohi (Exhibit 22) as a comparable …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants claimed land acquired for a minor irrigation project in Amlibari village and were compensated at Rs 53,000 per hectare by the Special Land Acquisition Officer. Dissatisfied, they filed references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying on a sale of agricultural …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants claimed land acquired for a minor irrigation project in Amlibari village and were compensated at Rs 53,000 per hectare by the Special Land Acquisition Officer. Dissatisfied, they filed references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying on a sale of agricultural …
DISMISSED
The applicants sought quashment of FIR No. 400/2021 and the charge sheet in RCC No. 53/2022, alleging that they were legitimate school staff and that the criminal complaint was maliciously filed amid a trust dispute. The prosecution alleged that the applicants conspired to fabricate appointment …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner challenged two orders of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Shrigonda in a boundary suit: one allowing the respondent to deposit the court commissioner fee and another appointing a Court Commissioner to measure the suit land. The petitioner argued that the trial court should have …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The case concerned lands acquired in 2000 for the Renapur‑Sudha Project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs 71,500 per hectare, which the claimants challenged under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act; the reference court raised the rate to Rs 136,500 per hectare. The acquiring body …
DISPOSED OFF
Madhukar Vikram Kalal filed a writ petition challenging the orders of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Talode, which rejected his applications for an adjournment and for a summons to the Registrar of Nandurbar to produce the original sale deed in Civil Suit No. 17/1988. The trial court held the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation acquired land for the Renapur‑Sudha Project under a Section 4 notification in 2000. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs 71,500 per hectare, which the claimants challenged under Section 18; the reference court enhanced it to Rs …
DISMISSED
The petitioner challenged the 4 December 2020 election result for the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly Graduates' Constituency, alleging excess and blank ballot sheets, discrepancies in vote counts, and unsigned ballots, and claimed corrupt practice under section 123(7) of the Representation of the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimants sought withdrawal of 75% of the compensation amount deposited by the Acquiring Body, citing a prior order that allowed such withdrawal subject to an undertaking to redeposit if an adverse order is later made. The court examined the precedent and found no objection from the Acquiring …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimants filed civil applications seeking withdrawal of the compensation amount deposited by the Acquiring Body following a prior court order. Relying on a precedent where the court permitted withdrawal of 75% of such deposits subject to an undertaking to redeposit if an adverse order arose, …
DISMISSED
The lands of claimants were acquired for the Wadi Shevadi Medium Project under a notification issued on 2 September 1999 pursuant to Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and an award was passed on 30 October 1999. The claimants later obtained enhanced compensation through a judgment dated 19 …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants, relatives of the husband of the deceased woman, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of the FIR, charge‑sheet, RCC and a process order relating to the alleged suicide of the deceased and her son. The FIR was based on a complaint by the deceased's brother …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimants sought permission to withdraw 75% of the compensation amount deposited by the Acquiring Body, citing a prior order allowing similar withdrawal subject to an undertaking. The court noted that the earlier order was not contested and granted the withdrawal with accrued interest, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimants filed civil applications seeking withdrawal of the compensation amount deposited by the Acquiring Body following a prior order of this Court. Relying on a precedent where the Court allowed withdrawal of 75% of such deposited amounts subject to an undertaking to redeposit if an adverse …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The petitioners, involved in a matrimonial dispute, filed a criminal application seeking quash of FIR No. 480 of 2025 and the related charge‑sheet. The parties verified their identities before the Judicial Registrar and executed a compromise deed on 24 July 2026, wherein the petitioner agreed to pay …
DISPOSED OFF
Popat Gotu Wani filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 96 of 2020 seeking a court direction to register a criminal offence against a contractor alleged to have encroached on his land adjacent to a road under construction. The petitioner’s counsel was absent, and the State was represented by Addl. P.P. A. …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant, Shahabazkhan Umar Khan, filed a second appeal (No. 418 of 1993) and sought the court's permission to withdraw it, based on written instructions from his client. The court, after considering the written instructions, granted leave to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the second appeal …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Prabhat Sheku Narwade, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. During the hearing, the advocate for respondent No. 3 informed the Court that the payment sought by the petitioner had already been made. …
DISPOSED OFF
The Executive Engineer, Krishna Khore Mahamandal filed a motion to correct typographical errors in the minutes of an order dated 08.04.2026. The appellant’s counsel pointed out that the phrase “learned AGP” was mistakenly typed instead of “learned Advocate for the appellant/acquiring body”. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, who are primary and secondary education officers employed by the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions alleging denial of salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to employees working in Tribal and PESA areas, as per the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The case concerns an application filed by Hema Govardhan Shinde and others seeking to have their appeal fixed for a final hearing. The appellant, represented by Mr. Dharashive M.L., requested that the court schedule the hearing. The court examined whether there was any legal impediment to fixing the …
DISPOSED OFF
The Executive Engineer, Krishna Khore Mahamandal filed a motion to correct typographical errors in the minutes of an order dated 08.04.2026. The appellant’s counsel pointed out that the phrase “learned AGP” was mistakenly typed instead of “learned Advocate for the appellant/acquiring body”. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Asoda Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Patsanstha Limited, filed writ petition No. 8057 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The petition remained unattended, with no appearance from the petitioner even …
DISMISSED
The husband, a senior regional manager earning over Rs.1.5 lakh per month, sought to set aside a Family Court order directing him to pay Rs.12,000 per month to his wife and Rs.8,000 per month to each of two minor children, totaling Rs.28,000. The wife and children had filed a petition under Section …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, employees deployed in tribal and PESA areas, filed writ petitions seeking salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale and arrears as per the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The State of Maharashtra and the Education Officer opposed, contending procedural issues. The Court …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Vaibhavi Vikas Khade, filed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking transfer of H.M.P. No. 158 of 2025 from the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Beed to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gangakhed. The minor daughter, about four years old, resides with the …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Kiran Chaitram Gadri filed a contempt petition (No. 64 of 2026) before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court against Ankeet, the Chief Executive Officer. The petitioner, through counsel, submitted a communication dated 18 September 2026 indicating his desire to withdraw the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, who were original defendants in a civil suit, filed a writ petition challenging two orders that granted a temporary injunction to the plaintiffs and were later affirmed on appeal. The trial court had granted the injunction under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2, read with Section 151 of …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, two educational trusts, filed writ petitions seeking reimbursement of fees for the 25% of students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. They alleged that the State of Maharashtra and the Zilla Parishad had not processed the reimbursement …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed civil applications (Nos. 2961/1998 and 2955/1998) seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and award that had been rendered against them. They contended that the entire amount ordered by the impugned judgment had already been deposited with the court. Relying on this …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed civil applications (Nos. 2961/1998 and 2955/1998) seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and award that had been rendered against them. They contended that the entire amount ordered by the impugned judgment had already been deposited with the court. Relying on this …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged a District Judge's order allowing an amendment to the plaint at the appellate stage in a suit concerning the validity of a sale deed. They argued that the original plaintiff (respondent) had ample opportunity to amend earlier and that the amendment was an attempt to fill a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Dagadu Yadav Dalal, challenged a 2009 judgment and award of a land acquisition reference that had been dismissed because he failed to appear or present evidence. He filed a writ petition in 2020, invoking a precedent (Walmik Trimbak Tupe v. State) to seek restoration of the reference …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a first appeal (ST.) No.1916 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against respondents Sambhaji Ananta Jawalkar and another. The appeal had been filed after the prescribed period, and the applicant sought condonation of the delay. Counsel …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Rohit Sahebrao Shegar, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 106 of 2026 seeking a court order to defreeze his bank account held with Yes Bank Ltd. The petitioner alleged that the account remained frozen despite his request. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, appointed as Assistant Teachers in various Zilla Parishads and later promoted to Graduate Teacher pay scales, applied for inter‑district transfers. The 24‑April‑2017 Government Resolution required them to consent to a reversion to Assistant Teacher upon transfer, thereby forfeiting …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, who were appointed as Assistant Teachers in various Zilla Parishads and later promoted to Graduate Teacher pay scales, applied for inter‑district transfers. The 2017 Government Resolution (Clause 3.3) required that upon such transfers they revert to the Assistant Teacher post, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Nandkumar Tukaram Tivghale, filed a contempt petition seeking an adjournment. The petitioner’s counsel, Adv. Gayatri S. Kalve, argued for the adjournment, while the Assistant Government Pleader, Ms. U.S. Bhosale, submitted that the contempt order had already been complied with, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Gajannan Nayabrao Mogal, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Union of India and other respondents to decide a second appeal (dated 23‑12‑2024, bearing No. JC700772K) that he had filed, and to consider his claim for medical benefits under the applicable law. The …
DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed a Land Reference Court award that increased compensation for 3.96 hectares of land acquired for the Wadi‑Shewadi Project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had fixed Rs 34,787 per hectare under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but the Reference Court …
DISPOSED OFF
Satish Bhujangrao Gaikwad filed a criminal revision application against Sujata Gaikwad and another, challenging a Family Court judgment dated 23 September 2021. The parties later reached a compromise, submitted the compromise deed to the High Court, and requested disposal of the revision. The Court, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, representing the estates of two deceased individuals, filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking redress of pending representations dated 15 November 1995, 11 December 2024 and 12 December 2024. The High Court examined whether the State was obligated to consider …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed several writ petitions seeking the benefits of the ACPs scheme, alleging that the State had not granted them such benefits. The State, through the Additional Government Pleader, contended that the petitioners had not first made any representation to the competent authorities …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 24‑08‑2026 in FA 4009/2008 and related appeals. The appellant, the Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Latur, had earlier filed the appeal, while the original claimants were represented by Mr. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners (accused Nos.4‑7) filed a writ petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings (R.C.C. No. 296/2023) arising from FIR No. 281/2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 326, 323, 143, 147, 149, 504 and 506. The incident involved an assault by a co‑accused named Rahul, who …
DISPOSED OFF
Parmeshwar Kesu Tagad filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the court to decide his pending application before the State of Maharashtra. While the petition was pending, the underlying application was finally decided by the appropriate authority. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The husband appealed an interim maintenance order passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, but filed the appeal nine months late, citing personal hardships and lack of knowledge of the order. The Additional Sessions Judge rejected …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellants, Nagya and Jahalya, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 149 of the IPC, based primarily on the testimony of the injured victim (PW5) and his son (PW6). On appeal, the High Court examined the credibility …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Narayan Dnyanoba Varale and others, filed a criminal application seeking its own withdrawal, stating that the trial was substantially complete with only two witnesses remaining and that the accused statements under Section 313 Cr.P.C. would follow. The respondent State of Maharashtra, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Bharti Yogiraj Sonwane and others, filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners repeatedly failed to appear and prosecute the petition, despite adjournments and a final opportunity granted by the court. Respondents, including the State and …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant was convicted by a Fast Track Special Court for rape (IPC s.376) and assault (IPC s.323) based on the testimony of the victim and her husband, despite a month-long delay in filing the FIR. On appeal, the High Court examined the credibility of the victim’s statements, the unexplained …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners sought disposal of their criminal revision application on the ground that the passage of time had rendered the matter infructuous. The learned counsel for the applicants argued that continuing the proceedings would be futile. The court examined the claim of infructuity and found no …
DISMISSED
The petitioners, accused in Crime No. 03/2014, challenged a magistrate's order directing further investigation after an informant filed a protest petition under Section 91 of the CrPC. They argued that, because a C‑summary had been filed and the FIR was pending quashment, they had a right to be …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, Ishwar Gorakh Patil and another, filed a civil application seeking service of notice on respondents Noormohammad Abdul Khan and others by newspaper publication, alleging that regular service could not be effected. The learned counsel for the applicants highlighted the inability to …
DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and award dated 29 September 2007 rendered by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nandurbar in land acquisition proceedings (LAR Nos. 40/2005 and 29/2005). The appellants contended that the compensation enhanced by the reference court …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Changdeo Bhivaji Khemnar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Maharashtra to fix his pay scale as a special teacher and award arrears based on the 6th and 7th Pay Commissions, alleging that his representations since 14 October 2013 remained unanswered, the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer (Acquiring Body) appealed against awards of compensation granted by a reference court to several landowners under the Land Acquisition Act, contending that the court had excessively enhanced the compensation beyond the rate fixed by the State Level Award Officer (SLAO). The …
DISMISSED
The legal heirs of the deceased Gangadhar filed a death claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, alleging that a tractor collided with his motorcycle, causing fatal injuries. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held United India Insurance Co. Ltd. jointly and severally liable with the owner …
DISPOSED OFF
Gopal Mareppa Kamble filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking payment of leave encashment and cash arrears under the 7th Pay Scale. The respondents, including the Education Officer, submitted that a proposal on the payment would be decided within four weeks and the petitioner …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Mah. State Elect. Distribution Co. Ltd., filed a criminal revision challenging the acquittal of the respondents under Sections 39 and 44 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910. The revision was listed twice but no counsel appeared for the applicant. During the pendency of the revision, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Datta Baswantrao Patil, filed a writ petition alleging that a revision application (Revision No.708/2015) pending before the State of Maharashtra had not been decided for 11 years. The petitioner sought direction for the respondent to decide the revision promptly. The High Court …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The petitioners sought condonation of a four‑day delay in filing a civil application to bring the legal representatives of a deceased appellant on record, and also requested that the abatement of the suit be set aside. The respondents opposed the application. The Court examined the reasons for the …
DISPOSED OFF
A writ petition (WP No. 8007 of 2011) was filed by Kachru Shankar Shinde against Radhabai Tukaram Shinde and others. The petitioner failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date of 16 July 2026. The court recorded the petitioner's absence and, noting the lack of prosecution, ordered the …
DISPOSED OFF
Abdul Khuddus Abdul Saeed Shaikh filed Writ Petition No. 3766 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of the respondents. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Rohan S. Salve, later moved a motion to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the …
Withdrawn
The petitioner, Sulakshana, filed Criminal Application No.2760 of 2026 and Criminal Writ Petition No.113 of 2026 against her husband. The parties subsequently settled the dispute amicably, and the petitioner, through counsel, expressed a desire to discontinue the proceedings. The learned counsel …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Shilpa Dipak Bhole, sought conversion of her unaided teaching post to an aided post on a 100 % grant‑in‑aid basis. The Education Officer had approved only a 20 % grant‑in‑aid and the petitioner filed a writ petition alleging violation of the earlier sanction. The State, through its …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer (Acquiring Body) filed several First Appeals challenging the compensation awarded by a Reference Court for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act. The Reference Court had enhanced the compensation from the State Level Award Officer's rate of Rs.1,71,000 per hectare to …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Geeta Manikrao Patil and another, challenged an order dated 01.01.2026 that forfeited their right to adduce evidence in an enquiry under Section 41E of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act before the Joint Charity Commissioner, Aurangabad. They argued that the forfeiture resulted from …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer (Acquiring Body) filed several First Appeals challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by a Reference Court to various landowners under the Land Acquisition Act. The Reference Court had enhanced the compensation from the State Level Award Officer's rate of Rs.1,71,000 …
DISPOSED OFF
Premanand Jangu Pawar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Special Recovery Officer and others. The petitioner died before the matter could be decided, and no steps were taken to bring any legal representatives on record. The court examined …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed several writ petitions (Nos. 2089, 2091, 2096, 3012, 3013 of 2016) seeking a mandatory direction that the State of Maharashtra frame a specific policy within a fixed timeline. They argued that the earlier order in Writ Petition No. 2087 of 2016, which dealt with a similar …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The Executive Engineer (Acquiring Body) filed several First Appeals challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by a Reference Court to various landowners under the Maharashtra Land Acquisition Act. The Reference Court had enhanced the compensation from the State Level Award Officer's rate of …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer (Acquiring Body) filed several First Appeals challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by a Reference Court to various claimants under the Land Acquisition Act. The claimants had been awarded Rs.1,71,000 per hectare by the State Level Awarding Officer (SLAO), which the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The Executive Engineer (Acquiring Body) filed several First Appeals challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by a Reference Court to various landowners under the Land Acquisition Act. The respondents claimed compensation at Rs.1,71,000 per hectare, which the Reference Court enhanced to …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Ganesh Basweshwar Pattewad, sought protection from his employer who issued a show‑cause notice demanding a caste validity certificate, alleging that his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe was pending before the Scrutiny Committee since 2016. The State, through the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed three writ petitions (Nos. 752, 3929, and 764 of 2007) challenging actions of the Collector, Aurangabad and other respondents. During the hearing, counsel for the respondents, Ms. Anagha Pandit, submitted that the petitions had become infructuous. The Court considered the …
DISPOSED OFF
Three writ petitions were filed in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Collector and other respondents. Counsel Ms. Anagha Pandit, appearing for the respondents, informed the court that the petitions had become infructuous. The court considered whether there was any …
ABATED
The appellant, Maganlal Manikprasad Kapoor, filed a criminal appeal (No. 102 of 2006) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, and a death certificate was submitted through the Bailiff's report. The court considered whether the appeal …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, dealt with several writ petitions filed by doctors against the State of Maharashtra. One petition (WP No.2933 of 2019) was withdrawn on the petitioner's request and consequently dismissed. The remaining petitions (WP Nos.11919 of 2021, 3056 of 2019, 3057 of …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellant, owner of 6.2 hectares of agricultural land acquired for an irrigation tank, was initially compensated at Rs 7,500‑8,500 per hectare. He sought a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the Reference Court enhanced the market value to Rs 12,000 per hectare. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Rauf Nyaju Patel, filed a contempt petition in 2013 against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel sought time to take instructions, but the Additional Government Pleader informed the court that a contempt enquiry had already been initiated and a final order should have …
DISPOSED OFF
The petition was filed by the legal heirs of the deceased Ustad Khwajabhai Lalmohammad seeking to be impleaded as necessary parties in the pending writ petition. The petitioners argued that their interests were directly affected and that procedural rules required their inclusion. The State of …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra sought leave to appeal an acquittal of a supply‑office clerk who was alleged to have demanded an 8% commission as a bribe for clearing a grain supply bill in 2013. The prosecution relied on a recorded conversation, a pre‑trap panchanama, and the testimony of the complainant …
DISPOSED OFF
Chhaya Dnyaneshwar Patankar filed a criminal revision application against the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the application, the parties reached a compromise, and the applicant’s counsel submitted that the cause of action no longer survived. The court examined whether the revision …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Shivlal Asaram Ghunawat, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Counsel for the petitioner argued that subsequent developments rendered the petition infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and held that the petition no longer required …
DISMISSED
Samadhan Shantaram Kumawat filed a criminal revision application against Pooja Samadhan Kumawat and another. The High Court, after noting that the applicant had not appeared on the adjourned date despite a prior warning, dismissed the revision application. The court had earlier warned on 14 August …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Ramesh Dattatraya Bhagwat filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Pandurang Yashwant Ekand and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, appearing via video conference, informed the court that, according to telephonic information, both …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Amol Shivaji Dhas, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State Information Commission to decide his second appeal dated 10 November 2025 within a stipulated period. The respondent's Additional Government Pleader waived service of notice and, on behalf of the Commission, …
Withdrawn
The applicants filed a criminal application and subsequently sought the Court’s permission to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the applicants moved that the application be withdrawn. The Court considered whether it could grant such permission. It granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Avinash Gulabrao Gangarde and others, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in their writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court examined whether the delay could be condoned and whether the writ petition should be restored. The Court, after …
DISPOSED OFF
Madhav Yashwant Pawar filed a writ petition (WP 5514 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of Pankaj Janardan Salunke and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. The court considered whether the …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Sadashiv Vishnupant Choudhary, filed a criminal revision application. The applicant’s counsel argued that the passage of time had rendered the application ineffective. The court examined whether the delay made the revision infructuous. Finding that the delay indeed precluded any …
RULE ABSOLUTE
Sagar Premlala Jaiswal, a bootlegger, challenged his detention order dated 19‑12‑2025 issued by the District Magistrate under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities (MPDA) Act, 1981. The petitioner argued that although he faced several prosecutions under the Maharashtra …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of writ petitions (Nos. 1182-1259 of 2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners, through counsel, asserted that an alternative remedy was available to them and expressed their intention to pursue that remedy instead of the …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of writ petitions (WP 1182/2025 to WP 1259/2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials, seeking relief from alleged violations. The petitioners argued that the court should entertain their writ applications. The respondents contended that the …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of writ petitions (Nos. 1182‑1259 of 2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials, seeking relief presumably under constitutional or statutory provisions. The petitioners, through counsel A. T. Jadhavar, informed the Court that an alternative …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of writ petitions (Nos. 1182-1259 of 2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners sought relief from the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, alleging grievances that were not detailed in the judgment. During the hearing, the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Controller Divisional Office MSRTC Latur applied to the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, for a stay of execution of a judgment and award, undertaking to deposit the full amount with interest within twelve weeks. The court conditioned the stay on the applicant’s compliance with the deposit …
DISPOSED OFF
Rahul Babanrao Bhagwat filed a public interest writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief concerning a representation he submitted on 18 December 2025. The petition challenged the delay or inaction of the Collector in deciding that representation. The Court examined …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners Mahendra Nathuram Pandya and another filed a writ petition (19 WRIT PETITION NO. 3703 OF 2022) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the National Highway Authority of PIU and others. The petition was listed before Justice Siddheshwar S. Thombre on 16 February 2026. …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Shaheen Altaf Shaikh filed a criminal application seeking correction of the first paragraph and the second part of the operative order dated 24 June 2025 in Criminal Application No. 160 of 2025. The applicant contended that the order should have included Sections 304‑B, 306 and 498‑A of the Indian …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a decision, but the learned Additional Government Pleader informed the court that the matter had already been decided and disposed of by the Reference Court. Consequently, the court found that no issue remained for adjudication. The petition was …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Prakash Dayanand Gurav challenged his termination of service by filing a writ petition, arguing that the termination violated natural justice and that an alternate remedy of filing a revision under Rule 15(1)(c) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad District Services (Discipline and Appeal) …
DISMISSED
The appellant's 137‑R parcel of land in Jaibhachiwadi was acquired in 1987 for a percolation tank, and the State initially paid Rs 250 per R. Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act the appellant obtained a reference court award of Rs 1,000 per R, but appealed for further enhancement, arguing …
DISPOSED OFF
Vasantabai Chaturbhuj Sarda filed a writ petition (No. 2172 of 2003) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Kaveribai Bhagorao Pole and others. The petitioner sought relief, but the counsel argued that the passage of time had rendered the matters raised in the petition moot. The Court …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The wife, Anmika Patni, filed a transfer application under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code seeking to move Hindu Marriage Petition No. 82 of 2025, filed in Sillod, to the court in Kopargaon where she resides with her minor child. The marriage had broken down due to alleged cruelty by the …
DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of Gunvant Damodhar Salve, a senior clerk who was alleged to have demanded a Rs 5,000 bribe to forward a rent‑grant proposal for a government‑aided school. The Anti‑Corruption Bureau set up a trap, recording the alleged demand and later a main‑trap …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of continuation contempt petitions (Nos. 30, 44, 48, 51, 52, 65, 67, 68, 81 of 2012) were filed by various petitioners against Rajgopal Deora and others. The petitioners, represented by Mr. Sharad S. Shinde and Mr. V. P. Bhavthankar, argued that the contempt orders had not been complied …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 24‑08‑2026 in FA 4009/08 and related appeals. Counsel Mr. V.D. Gunale, who appeared for the original claimants, was omitted from the title clause of the order. The appellant’s counsel and the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a series of continuation contempt petitions (Nos. 30, 44, 48, 51, 52, 65, 67, 68, 81 of 2012) against various respondents alleging non‑compliance with a prior contempt order. The petitioners argued that the contempt orders had been complied with, rendering the petitions …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of writ petitions (Nos. 1182/2025 to 1259/2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners, through their counsel, informed the Court that an alternative statutory remedy was available to them and that they intended to pursue that …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of continuation contempt petitions (Nos. 30, 44, 48, 51, 52, 65, 67, 68, 81 of 2012) were filed by various petitioners against Rajgopal Deora and others. The petitioners, represented by Mr. Sharad S. Shinde and Mr. V. P. Bhavthankar, argued that the contempt orders had not been complied …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of writ petitions (WP Nos. 1182-1259 of 2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners sought relief from the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, alleging violations of their rights. During the hearing, the petitioners, …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 24‑08‑2026 in FA 4009/2008 and related appeals. The appellant, the Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Latur, had filed the appeal, while the original claimants were represented by counsel Mr. V.D. …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of writ petitions (WP 1182/2025 to WP 1259/2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners sought relief from the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, alleging grievances that required judicial intervention. During the hearing, …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of writ petitions (Nos. 1182-1259 of 2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners, represented by Mr. A. T. Jadhavar, argued that an alternative statutory remedy was available to address their grievances. They subsequently …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 24‑08‑2026 in FA 4009/08 and related appeals. Counsel Mr. V.D. Gunale, who appeared for the original claimants, was omitted from the title clause of the order. The appellant, the Executive Engineer, …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of writ petitions (Nos. 1182/2025 to 1259/2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials, seeking relief from alleged violations. The petitioners, represented by Advocate A. T. Jadhavar, informed the Court that an alternative statutory remedy was …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of writ petitions (Nos. 1182-1259 of 2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners, represented by Advocate A. T. Jadhavar, claimed that an alternative remedy was available to address their grievances. They subsequently informed …
DISMISSED
The Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Latur appealed against Babasaheb Sahebrao Shendge and others. During the proceedings, counsel Mr. V.D. Gunale, representing the original claimants, noticed that his name was omitted from the title clause of the order. He moved a motion to have his appearance …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of writ petitions (WP 1182/2025 to WP 1259/2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials, seeking relief from alleged violations. The petitioners, represented by Mr. A. T. Jadhavar, argued that an alternative statutory remedy was available to …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of writ petitions (WP 1182/2025 to WP 1259/2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials, seeking relief presumably under constitutional or statutory provisions. The petitioners, through counsel, informed the Court that an alternative remedy was …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of writ petitions (WP/1182/2025 to WP/1259/2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials, seeking relief from alleged violations. The petitioners, represented by Advocate A. T. Jadhavar, informed the Court that an alternative statutory remedy was …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 1182‑1259 of 2025) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The court noted that the petitioners, through their counsel, informed the bench that an alternative statutory remedy was available to them and that they …
DISPOSED OFF
A large group of petitioners filed separate writ petitions (Nos. 1182-1259 of 2025) against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners, through their counsel, informed the Court that an alternative remedy was available and that they intended to pursue that remedy instead of the writ …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of writ petitions (Nos. 1182‑1259 of 2025) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners sought relief from the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, alleging violations of their rights. During the hearing, the petitioners’ counsel …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Sandip Choudhari, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment for allegedly killing Vitthal Madane with an axe. He filed an application seeking suspension of his sentence and bail pending his appeal, arguing that the key eyewitness, Aishwarya, was …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 24‑08‑2026 in FA 4009/08 and related appeals. The appellant, the Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Latur, had filed the appeal, while the original claimants were represented by counsel Mr. V.D. …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants, Pradeep Keshav Rathod and family members, were charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in connection with the suicide of Sonali, who alleged severe physical and mental cruelty by her husband and in‑laws. The prosecution alleged that the accused had …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed an application for leave to appeal against the acquittal of two government officials, a Talathi and his assistant, who were charged under Sections 7, 8, 12 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The prosecution alleged that the officials demanded and …
DISMISSED
The accused, Rajendra Warade, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs 12 lakhs that was dishonoured, the cheque having been issued to repay a hand‑loan allegedly given by the complainant, Bhaskar. The trial court held that the cheque was issued in …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Nandkishor Pannalal Oswal, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the failure of Respondent No.4 to decide his representation dated 18 April 2022. The petition alleged that despite a report submitted by the Additional Collector on 6 June 2022, no decision had …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant, the estate of the deceased Dhondu Tukaram Bari represented by LRs Vasant and others, filed a second appeal (No. 320 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against respondents Shrikant Gopaldas Khatod and others. The appellant's counsel, on written instructions marked …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Ganpat Gangaram Dudule and another, filed a criminal writ petition seeking continuous police patrolling, police protection, and registration of offences against accused persons who allegedly assaulted and threatened them at an agricultural field in Hingoli. They relied on complaints …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Jawaharlal Madanlal Sarda, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction that the State’s Charity Commissioner (Respondent No. 2) decide Appeal No. 36 of 2024 within one month. The petition highlighted that the appeal was filed on 19 June 2024 and that despite an application for …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Prathviraj Jawaharlal Sarda, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for Respondent No. 2 (the Charity Commissioner) to decide Revision No. 70 of 2025 within one month. The petition highlighted that the revision was filed on 1 July 2025 and that there were irregularities in …
DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2002 judgment of the Additional District Judge, Jalgaon, which had enhanced compensation for land acquired from the deceased Chhabibai Ramsing Naik, setting the market value at Rs.4,00,000 per hectare. The State argued that the enhancement was unjustified, while …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The petitioners, legal heirs of the deceased appellants, filed a civil application seeking to be brought on record despite a delay of 203 days in filing. They requested the court to condone this delay and to set aside any abatement that might have been effected against them. The court examined …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Durgaprasad Omprakash Mishra, sought extension of a 28‑day furlough leave granted on 25‑09‑2025, arguing that the leave expired because Respondent No.3 (the Tehsildar) failed to process the required surety bond. The respondents contended that once the furlough period lapses, it …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Veej Kamgar Co‑Operative Credit Society, sought a writ directing M.S.E.D.C.L. to accept and encash two cheques issued by respondent No.6 and to refund the amounts to society members whose salaries had been deducted. The society had been appointed by M.S.E.D.C.L. to collect …
DISPOSED OFF
Omkar Enterprises, through its proprietor Shivaji Sonaji Kawale, filed Writ Petition No. 1774 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Union of India and other respondents. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. P.R. Nangare, later sought the Court's permission to …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay dismissed a series of first appeals filed by the Executive Engineer, the acquiring body, challenging various judgments and awards relating to land acquisition for the Sina‑Kolegaon Medium Project. The appeals pertained to acquisitions in the villages of Domgaon and Sonari, …
DISMISSED
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for land acquired for the widening of NH‑211, alleging that the valuation was excessive, fraudulent and that the arbitrator denied NHAI a fair opportunity to …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Devidas Dagdu Jadhav and another, filed a writ petition challenging two orders: one dated 22‑12‑2016 passed by the Principal District Judge, Osmanabad in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.18 of 2015, and another dated 30‑01‑2015 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Tuljapur …
DISPOSED OFF
The President of the Industrial Association of Small Scale filed Contempt Petition No. 39 of 2008 against the State of Maharashtra and others, alleging non-compliance with a prior contempt order. The petition was heard before a bench of Justices Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav. Counsel …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Dr. Zakir Hussain Education Society, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Commissioner/Administrator of Nanded Waghala Municipal Corporation to decide a proposal dated 13 May 2025 concerning the refund of property tax paid from 2018 to 2024 and exemption from …
DISPOSED OFF
The dispute between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and the claimants was referred to the Lok Adalat for settlement. The appellant filed an appeal (First Appeal No. 919 of 2002) but subsequently submitted a withdrawal pursis along with the authority letter. The Lok Adalat, observing the withdrawal, …
DISPOSED OFF
The dispute between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and the claimants Limbaji Tukaram Wanve & Ors. was referred to the Lok Adalat under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. The appellant filed an appeal but subsequently submitted a withdrawal petition along with the requisite …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Rajesaheb Venkatrao Gore and others filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Competent Authority that rejected a stay. During the proceedings, the parties reached an amicable settlement before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The petitioners' counsel informed the court that, in view …
DISPOSED OFF
The dispute between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and the claimants was referred to a Lok Adalat under the Legal Services Authorities Act. The appellant filed an appeal but subsequently submitted a withdrawal petition along with the requisite authority letter. The Lok Adalat disposed of the …
DISPOSED OFF
The dispute between The New India Assurance Co. and the claimants was referred to the Lok Adalat. The appellant filed a first appeal (No. 920 of 2002) but subsequently submitted withdrawal pursis and an authority letter. The Lok Adalat, noting the withdrawal, disposed of the appeal and any related …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 24‑08‑2026 in FA 4009/08 and related appeals. The appellant, the Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Latur, had filed the appeal, while the original claimants were represented by counsel Mr. V.D. …
DISMISSED
The Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Latur appealed against respondents Babasaheb Sahebrao Shendge and others. During the proceedings, counsel Mr. V.D. Gunale appeared for the original claimants but his name was omitted from the title clause of the order. Mr. Gunale moved a motion seeking to have …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 24‑08‑2026 in First Appeal No. 4009 of 2008. The appellant, the Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Latur, had earlier filed the appeal, and the original claimants were represented by counsel …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 24‑08‑2026 in First Appeal No. 4009 of 2008 and related appeals. The appellant, the Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Latur, had filed the appeal, while the original claimants were represented by …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 24‑08‑2026 in FA 4009/08 & others. The appellant, the Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Latur, had filed the appeal, and counsel for the original claimants, Mr. V.D. Gunale, observed that his name …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing a first appeal against a 2002 land acquisition award. The court found the delay neither deliberate nor intentional and allowed the application, condoning the delay. The State, through its A.G.P., relied on a …
DISMISSED
The Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Latur appealed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, in a series of first appeals (FA 4009/08 and related). During the proceedings, counsel Mr. V.D. Gunale appeared for the original claimants but his name was omitted from the title clause of the …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 24‑08‑2026 in FA 4009/08. The appellant, the Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Latur, had filed the appeal, while the original claimants were represented by counsel Mr. V.D. Gunale, whose name was …
DISMISSED
The Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Latur appealed against Babasaheb Sahebrao Shendge and others. During the proceedings, counsel Mr. V.D. Gunale appeared for the original claimants but his name was omitted from the title clause of the order. He moved a motion seeking to have his appearance …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 24‑08‑2026 in FA 4009/08 and related appeals. Counsel Mr. V.D. Gunale, appearing for the original claimants, observed that his name was omitted from the title clause. The court examined the …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 24‑08‑2026 in appeal FA 4009/08. The appellant, the Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Latur, had earlier filed several first appeals. Counsel for the original claimants, Mr. V.D. Gunale, pointed …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 24‑08‑2026. Counsel for the original claimants, Mr. V.D. Gunale, pointed out that his name was omitted from the title clause. The court agreed that the omission needed rectification, directing …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed a civil application seeking permission to serve three unserved respondents (Nos.1a, 1c & 1e) by substituted service under Order V Rule 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The last known address of the respondents was within the jurisdiction of Rajkot, Gujarat, and the petitioner …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Kishanrao Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Udgir, challenged the order dated 08.08.2024 in which its proposal for the transfer of an Ashram school was rejected on the ground of four deficiencies. The petitioner remedied all the deficiencies and communicated the compliance to the Additional …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Dinesh Suryawanshi, sought correction of his date of birth in the Zilla Parishad Primary School record, claiming the entry of 15‑06‑1968 was a clerical error made at admission, while his actual birth date is 15‑09‑1970. An earlier attempt in 1999 to rectify the error remained …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 24‑08‑2026 in appeal FA 4009/08 and related appeals. Counsel Mr. V.D. Gunale, who appeared for the original claimants, was omitted from the title clause. The appellant’s counsel and the State’s …
DISMISSED
The Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Latur appealed against a decree, and the original claimants were represented by counsel Mr. V.D. Gunale. The counsel observed that his name was omitted from the title clause of the minutes of the order dated 24‑08‑2026. He moved a motion seeking to have his …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 24‑08‑2026 in appeal FA 4009/08 and related appeals. Counsel Mr. V.D. Gunale, appearing for the original claimants, pointed out that his name was omitted from the title clause. The court examined the …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court considered a civil revision filed by the purchasers (defendant Nos.18‑24) challenging the trial court's order refusing to reject a suit filed by the original plaintiffs for pre‑emption, declaration and injunction over an undivided joint Hindu family property. The plaintiffs claimed a …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 24‑08‑2026 in FA 4009/08 and related appeals. Counsel Mr. V.D. Gunale, appearing for the original claimants, observed that his name was omitted from the title clause. The court examined the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Agasti Sarva Seva Sangh Akole, filed a writ petition challenging a lower court order that rejected its application for a Jangam warrant against the respondent and dismissed the execution proceedings. The lower court had directed the decree holder to be present at the execution site, …
DISPOSED OFF
Agasti Sarva Seva Sangh (Akole) filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chalisgaon dated 28 September 2015, which dismissed its application for a Jangam warrant and execution proceedings against the respondents. The lower court had directed the decree holder …
DISMISSED
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for lands acquired for the widening of NH‑211, alleging excessive valuation, fraud and denial of fair opportunity before the arbitrator. The CALA had fixed …