DISPOSED OFF
Navnath BhauSaheb Shinde applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 3(5) and 318(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging cheating in a marriage‑related transaction. The prosecution alleged that Shinde facilitated the introduction of a girl to the complainant and was …
Withdrawn
The appellant, Prashant alias Prasad Baliram Kalbande, filed Criminal Application No. 3143 of 2026 in Criminal Appeal No. 118 of 2026 but the application was not listed for hearing. The appellant's counsel, Mr. Sudarshan J. Salunke, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the pending application. …
DISMISSED
The Executive Engineer Lower Terna Canal Division No.2 Latur appealed against a 2008 judgment and award of compensation rendered by a Reference Court in several land acquisition cases (L.A.R. Nos. 718, 722, 721, 720 of 1998). The appellant argued that the compensation awarded was excessive, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Yogesh Atamaram Dhanrale, claimed that his proposal, after having its deficiencies removed, was still not approved by the State. The High Court noted that such grievances are to be addressed before the Grievance Redressal Committee constituted under the Government Resolution of 27 …
DISPOSED OFF
The case involved a large group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Reference Court and the acquiring body sought to overturn it. The Reference Court had fixed …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of sixteen first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings for the Tapi Minor Irrigation Project in Dhule, where the appellants' dry lands were acquired on a compulsory basis. The reference Court had fixed compensation at Rs.1,20,000 per hectare (or …
DISPOSED OFF
Balaji Dhondiba Jadhav filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking consideration of his proposal under Rule 41 and 41A of the MEPS Rules and the payment of his regular salary. The Court observed that the petition is squarely covered by its earlier decision in Writ …
DISMISSED
The Executive Engineer of Lower Terna Canal appealed against a judgment and award dated 03 July 2008 passed by the Reference Court in L.A.R. Nos. 718, 722, 721 and 720 of 1998, which granted compensation to several landowners. The appellants argued that the compensation awarded was excessive, …
DISMISSED
The Executive Engineer Lower Terna Canal Division No.2, Latur appealed against a judgment and award dated 03 July 2008 rendered by the Reference Court in L.A.R. Nos.718, 722, 721 and 720 of 1998. The appellants contended that the compensation awarded was excessive, arguing that it exceeded the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Kaveri Bhausaheb Jadhav and another, filed a writ petition seeking appointment of the second petitioner on compassionate grounds under a Government Resolution dated 31.12.2002. Respondents No. 3 and 4 filed an affidavit indicating their willingness to forward the petitioners' …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Jayram filed a writ petition seeking relief concerning the disability certification of his minor daughter. The High Court ordered the petitioner to appear before a Medical Officer for the examination of the child. The petitioner complied, and the child was examined as directed. The Court …
DISMISSED
The Executive Engineer Lower Terna Canal Division No. 2, Latur appealed against a judgment and award dated 3 July 2008 passed by the Reference Court in several land acquisition reference cases. The appellant argued that the compensation awarded by the Reference Court exceeded four times the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay and stay of an impugned judgment and award. The Court examined whether the delay in filing the applications could be condoned and whether a stay should be granted pending deposit of the enhanced compensation. It …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 277‑day delay in preferring a first appeal. The respondents, Santosh Shivram Kahnuje and others, opposed the condonation. The court noted that although a stay application had …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation filed two civil applications. The first sought condonation of a 28‑day delay in filing a first appeal, and the court, after hearing the applicant’s counsel, found the delay was not deliberate and allowed the condonation in the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation filed a first appeal against a tribunal award in favor of Suvarna Govind Gonare. The appellant also moved two civil applications: one seeking a stay of the award (Application No. 8581) and another (Application No. 8574) challenging the procedural validity …
DISPOSED OFF
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation filed a first appeal against a tribunal award in favor of Suvarna Govind Gonare. The appellant also moved two civil applications: one seeking a stay of the award (Application No. 8581) and another (Application No. 8574) challenging the procedural validity …
DISPOSED OFF
Chandrakant Rustumrao More filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents had not complied with an order to pay subsistence allowance. The petitioner’s counsel claimed the petitioner had died on 30‑12‑2013. The respondents produced a statement of account showing that the allowance had been …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) filed two civil applications before the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court. Application 8532 sought condonation of a 97‑day delay in filing its first appeal against a tribunal order. The Court examined the reasons and found the delay was not …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Medium Project Division, Osmanabad filed an application seeking condonation of a 1,092‑day delay in filing a first appeal. The respondent was served but did not appear before the court. Relying on the reasons set out in paragraphs 5 to 7 of the application, the court allowed …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur filed a civil application seeking to set aside the order dated 05.05.2026 passed by the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court. The applicant argued that the order was erroneous and that the matter required removal of office objections. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur filed a civil application challenging an order dated 05.05.2026 issued by the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court. The applicant sought quashing of that order on the ground of procedural objections. The Court, after hearing the applicant's …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of Shaikh Nasir Shaikh Saheblal, who was charged under Section 409 IPC for alleged misappropriation of Rs.88,030.70 while serving as secretary of a cooperative society. The accused failed to produce the cash during an audit but later deposited the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Rohit Divakar Pawar filed a civil application before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, against Gajanan Bharat Rao Kulkarni and another respondent. The applicant was represented by Mr. Ashutosh S. Kulkarni, while the second respondent was represented by Mr. Swapnil S. Rathi. …
DISMISSED
The husband appealed a maintenance order of Rs. 4,000 per month imposed by the JMFC, Jamner, and a subsequent dismissal of his criminal appeal by the Sessions Judge. He contended that the amount was excessive and that he lacked sufficient earning capacity to pay it. The Court examined whether the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sant Namdeo Labour Co Operative Society Ltd, filed a writ petition challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. The Court examined the petition and, without addressing substantive merits, granted the petitioner liberty to pursue an alternate remedy. No detailed factual or legal …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Eknath s/o Ganpat Jadhav, filed a civil application seeking service of notice on respondents Nos. 10-1 and 10-2 by way of newspaper publication. The court examined the adequacy of the application and the necessity of publishing the notice to ensure due process. It ordered that a fresh …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Madhukar, a senior citizen over 70, filed a civil application seeking to withdraw a larger portion of the award amount that the Acquiring Body had deposited in the High Court during a first appeal. Earlier, the Court had allowed the claimant to withdraw only 60% of the deposited sum. The Acquiring …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered two writ petitions filed by Alka Rajendra Waghmare et al. and Rajendra Ratnakar Waghmare against the State of Maharashtra. Both petitions involved factual disputes that the Court deemed unsuitable for adjudication through writ jurisdiction. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sangharatna Narayan Chaudante, filed Writ Petition No. 9713 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through Advocate Rahul M. Gaikwad, later moved the Court requesting leave to withdraw the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, Gmidc Jalna Road Aurangabad through the Executive Engineer of the Minor Irrigation Division, Latur, filed several civil applications seeking to record the legal heirs of the original claimant, Kashinath Vishwanathappa Kapse, who died on 11 June 2026. The applications were filed 49 …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, Gmidc Jalna Road Aurangabad through the Executive Engineer of the Minor Irrigation Division, Latur, filed several civil applications seeking to record the legal heirs of the original claimant, Kashinath Vishwanathappa Kapse, who died on 11 June 2026. The applications were filed 49 …
DISPOSED OFF
Syed Abdul Razzak Quadri and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a grievance against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners, represented by M.N. Shaikh (on behalf of Mr. S.S. Kazi), sought relief that was not granted by the lower authority. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, Gmidc Jalna Road Aurangabad through the Executive Engineer of the Minor Irrigation Division, Latur, filed several civil applications seeking to record the legal heirs of the original claimant, Kashinath Vishwanathappa Kapse, who died on 11 June 2026. The applications were filed 49 …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, Gmidc Jalna Road Aurangabad through the Executive Engineer of the Minor Irrigation Division, Latur, filed several civil applications seeking to record the legal heirs of the original claimant, Kashinath Vishwanathappa Kapse, who died on 11 June 2026. The applications were filed 49 …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellant's lands were acquired in 1977 for the Giraja Project and the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially compensated at Rs 50 per R treating them as dry lands. The appellant protested, and the reference court enhanced compensation to Rs 250 per R for 58 R deemed irrigated and Rs 90 per …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, a training and education trust, filed a writ petition seeking approval for the commencement of new subjects in the upcoming academic year. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, opposed the petition. The Court observed that the government‑issued schedule for approving …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Vinod Hari Ingle, filed a criminal revision application seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The Court, after hearing the applicant's counsel, expressed disinclination to grant any relief. The applicant's counsel then requested permission to withdraw the application. The …
Withdrawn
Dashrath Rangrao Kotgire applied for bail before the charge-sheet against him was approved. The applicant’s counsel requested the court to direct the investigating authorities to approve the charge-sheet promptly so that a fresh bail application could be filed thereafter. The court noted that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Parvatadevi Apang Shikshan And Prashikshan Prasarak Mandal, filed a writ petition seeking approval for the commencement of new subjects in their institution. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, contended that the statutory schedule for approving such proposals had …
DISPOSED OFF
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. filed two writ petitions in 2015 against respondents Rakhma (wife of Ashok Chavan) and Pramila (wife of Dattu Jagtap). The petitioner argued that the petitions had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The learned counsel submitted that the delay rendered the …
DISPOSED OFF
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. filed two writ petitions in 2015 against Rakhma (wife of Ashok Chavan) and Pramila (wife of Dattu Jagtap) respectively. The petitions remained pending for over ten years. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the long passage of time rendered the petitions …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the TET 2018 and 2019 results of 7,880 candidates on the basis of proven mark‑sheet tampering, finding that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had statutory authority under the 1998 Act and the 2010 Regulations to cancel …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants sought to vacate an interim relief granted by the High Court on 2 December 2020, arguing that the acquiring body (Respondent No.1) had only deposited 50% of the award amount despite a stay order that required full payment in related matters. The court noted that the acquiring body …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad bench) entertained a criminal application filed by Vasant Shivaji Wadikar seeking suspension of his sentence and bail pending the hearing of his appeal against a conviction under IPC sections 397 and 201. The applicant, who was 21 years old at trial and had been …
DISPOSED OFF
Shaikh Mubin Ali filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the State of Maharashtra's handling of his representation dated 04/06/2026. The petitioner sought relief directing the State to consider his representation. The Court examined whether the State had …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants, Rameshwar Sukhdev Rajale and Vishal Raosaheb Pawar, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offences under Sections 103(1), 189(2), 190, 191(2), 45 and 51 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 arising from a violent incident involving …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The National Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 19‑day delay in filing its first appeal against an order of the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal. The Court examined the reasons for the delay and, finding them satisfactory, allowed the application, thereby condoning …
Withdrawn
The petitioner, Deepak Ramesh Chetwani, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After hearing, the court expressed disinclination to grant bail. On instructions, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Avinash Yashwantrao Dodal filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 14‑day delay in filing his second appeal against Dr. Sujata Shivajirao Ambesange and others. The applicant argued that the delay was not deliberate or intentional. The Court examined the reasons provided and found no …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 1,538‑day delay in filing cross‑objections to first appeals filed by the acquiring body. They argued that the merit of the reference court's award was under challenge and that claimants have a statutory right to seek …
Withdrawn
The petitioner, Vijay Santosh Kakde, filed Bail Application No. 1609 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The Court, after hearing the applicant's counsel, expressed its disinclination to grant bail. The applicant's counsel then sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Nagesh alias Pravin Balasaheb Albhar, who feared arrest in connection with FIR No. 288/2025 alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including assault, rioting and theft of Rs.5,000. …
DISPOSED OFF
The Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Sambhajinagar and others filed a review application against an order dated 14 January 2026 that directed the Zilla Parishad to decide the petitioner's representation for a compassionate appointment. They contended that paragraph 4 of the order …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, Vaishali Ramdas Barphe, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 28‑day delay in filing a second appeal against the order dated 25.11.2026. The delay was alleged to be neither deliberate nor intentional. The court examined the application and considered the interest of …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 1,538‑day delay in filing cross‑objections to first appeals filed by the acquiring body. The applicants argued that the merit of the reference court's award was under challenge and that filing cross‑objections, rather than …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed a contempt petition in 2009 alleging that the respondents had failed to decide a complaint dated 24 December 2001 by the deadline of 30 June 2004, as ordered in a prior contempt order. The court noted that no further action on the contempt petition had been taken after 2013. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Govind Taterao Suryawanshi, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent (the court handling his appeal) to decide his pending appeal, which has been outstanding since 14 July 2026. The petition raised the issue of undue delay in the disposal of the appeal. …
DISPOSED OFF
Vishal Dairy, through its proprietor, filed a writ petition (939 WRIT PETITION NO. 9404 OF 2026) before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner argued that the appeal he had filed before the Commissioner had already been decided in …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant, a 25‑year‑old driver, was convicted by the Special POCSO Court for aggravated penetrative sexual assault of a 14‑year‑old girl, under Section 5(l) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 376(2)(n) of the IPC, and was sentenced to seven years’ rigorous …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Ashik Liyakat Sardar was arrested in January 2026 for allegedly injecting chemicals into cattle to increase milk yield, facing charges under Sections 123, 210, 274, 276 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 11(1)(g) and 12 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The prosecution …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Harshwardhan Baliram Tayade and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra in deciding their representations dated 6 May 2026. The petition sought direction for the respondent, specifically …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Raju Annasaheb Bhutekar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. While the application was pending, the applicant was arrested by the police. Counsel for the applicant informed the court …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 1538‑day delay in filing cross‑objections to first appeals filed by the acquiring body concerning compensation awards. They argued that the merit of the reference court’s judgment is under challenge and that claimants have a …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory powers …
DISPOSED OFF
The Pathri Taluka Shikshan Prasarak Mandal filed two writ petitions seeking reimbursement of fees paid for the 25% of students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The petitioners argued that the fees should be refunded as the Act mandates free education …
DISPOSED OFF
The Pathri Taluka Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, through its president, filed writ petitions seeking reimbursement of fees paid for the 25% of students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The petitioners argued that the management was entitled to recover those …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 1,538‑day delay in filing cross‑objections to first appeals filed by the acquiring body. They argued that the merit of the reference court's award was under challenge and that seeking enhanced compensation was a statutory …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2017 challenging actions of the Municipal Corporation. No counsel appeared for the petitioners on the scheduled hearing dates of 22.01.2026 and 23.01.2026. The Court, noting the lapse of several years and the petitioners' failure to prosecute, granted them a …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants sought condonation of a 1,538‑day delay in filing cross‑objections to first appeals filed by the acquiring body concerning compensation awards. They argued that the merit of the award was under challenge and that filing cross‑objections, rather than separate first appeals, was a …
DISPOSED OFF
Balaji Pandurang Bamne filed Writ Petition No. 8933 of 2015 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Pankaj S. Kokane and Mr. S. T. Veer. The State was represented by Mrs. D. S. Jape …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 1,538‑day delay in filing cross‑objections to first appeals filed by the acquiring body. They argued that the merit of the reference court’s award was under challenge and that filing cross‑objections, rather than separate …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Guruling Kashinath Pimpale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. During the pendency of the petition, subsequent developments occurred that rendered the relief sought by the petitioner moot. The …
DISPOSED OFF
Pallavi Uttam Dongare filed a writ petition challenging the denial of benefits under the Old Pension Scheme, asserting that she was recruited before the cut‑off date of 1 November 2005. The State of Maharashtra contended that the newer pension provisions applied. The Court examined the matter in …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 1,538‑day delay in filing cross‑objections to first appeals filed by the acquiring body. The applicants argued that the merit of the reference court's award was under challenge and that filing cross‑objections, rather than …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed several civil applications seeking condonation of a 1,538‑day delay in filing cross‑objections to first appeals filed by the acquiring body. They argued that the merit of the reference court's award was under challenge and that seeking enhanced compensation was a statutory …
DISPOSED OFF
Sunil Rangnath Lokhande filed a writ petition (906 WRIT PETITION NO. 8966 OF 2015) against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. Respondent No.7, represented by counsel Mr. Anandsing Bayas, contended that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. The Court examined the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Jija Mata Mahila Bachat Gat Wadali Digar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the court that the cause of action had become infructuous. The court accepted this …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Sambhaji Vitthalrao Sonwane and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief concerning a representation they had submitted on 30 July 2026. The petition was characterized as an innocuous prayer. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, ordered …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The appellants were convicted by the JMFC, Aurangabad for offences under Sections 143, 332 and 427 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly taking part in an unlawful assembly that damaged electricity department property. The conviction was based solely on the testimony of the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, a landowner whose property was compulsorily acquired, obtained an enhanced compensation award from the Reference Court. The acquiring body deposited 50% of this award in the High Court pending a first appeal. The applicant sought permission to withdraw the deposited amount. The Court …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer (K.K.V.M.) Irrigation Project filed a civil application seeking acquisition, but there was a delay of 505 days in filing. The court issued notice to the respondents; Respondent No. 1 did not appear, while an Additional Government Pleader appeared for Respondents Nos. 2 and 3. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Rajkumar Shamrao Jathal, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the court to decide a representation he had made on 20 July 1995. The petition was filed many years after the representation, raising the issue of whether the delay could be condoned. The Court examined the …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Rajkumar Shamrao Jathal filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition raised concerns regarding pending representations made by the petitioner on 27/05/2020, 30/03/2020 and 30/08/2023, which had not been …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a 17‑year‑old minor, sought a validity certificate confirming his belonging to the Thakur Scheduled Tribe after the Scrutiny Committee rejected his claim on the basis of contradictory caste entries of his ancestors. The petitioner relied on a 1915 school record showing his …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra, through the Collector of Jalna, filed an application seeking condonation of an 802‑day delay in filing its appeal against a decree in favor of Shaikh Juber Shaikh Allahuddin and another. The respondents opposed the condonation, but the applicant explained that the delay was …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged orders rejecting their temporary injunction application and granting police aid to respondents, seeking a direction that the trial courts decide the pending suits within a fixed period while maintaining the status‑quo. The High Court noted that the parties had agreed that …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Bhausaheb Baburao Labhade and another filed writ petitions challenging orders that rejected their application for a temporary injunction and granted police aid to the respondents. They sought a direction that the trial courts handling the underlying suits (R.C.S. No.186 of 2021 and …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 8007 of 2011 before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. On 16 July 2026 the petitioner failed to appear before the court. The court recorded the petitioner's absence and noted that the petition had been posted for dismissal. Consequently, the writ …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, a group of government employees, filed writ petitions seeking the benefit of a full‑year annual increment in their pension calculations, arguing that they had served more than six months in the year of their superannuation. The State of Maharashtra contended otherwise, but both …
DISMISSED
The appellants, Santosh Pandhari Chamle and Pandhari Vithoba Chamle, appealed against the Civil Judge's Judgment and Award that valued their acquired land at Rs.2,813 per ropani, treating it as seasonally irrigated, and compensated only 12 trees out of 17. They argued that the presence of a well, …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Vasant Atamaram Bhise and others filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra. The respondents filed a reply stating that they had complied with the contempt order. The petitioners, through counsel, sought further relief. The Court examined the compliance claim and found it …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay heard two first appeals and two cross‑objections arising from the same land‑acquisition proceedings for 4 acres and 8 acres in Garkheda, Aurangabad, originally awarded at Rs 7,500 per acre in 1980. The claimants sought a higher compensation and the acquiring body (CIDCO) …
DISMISSED
The applicant, Sumit Sanjay Godbole, filed a criminal revision application (No. 8545 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision of the lower court in a criminal matter against the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought a …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The Bombay High Court upheld the State and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. However, the Court set aside the order permanently debaring the petitioners from future …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, a retired teacher and her spouse, filed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment for the spouse in a government school, alleging a forthcoming vacancy due to an imminent superannuation. The management argued that there is currently a surplus teacher, no vacancy exists, …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellants, having surrendered before the police, filed a criminal appeal but subsequently sought to withdraw it, claiming the appeal had become infructuous. The sole issue before the court was whether the appeal could be dismissed on the ground of being infructuous due to the surrender. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Bhaga Ganpat Narsale, filed Civil Application No. 8792 of 2026 together with Writ Petition No. 4546 of 2015 against Kashinath Papurau Pathak. The application sought relief as set out in prayer clauses A and B. The High Court examined the content of the prayer clauses and the merits …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates on grounds of alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the consequent permanent debarment of thousands of candidates. The Court examined the statutory powers …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Sanjay Bhaskarrao Kale, filed a civil application seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to consider a representation made by the Shirdi Sansthan requesting deployment of CISF personnel at the Shree Saibaba Samadhi Temple. The court granted leave to amend the numbering of …
DISPOSED OFF
Ms P.P. Joshi, through its proprietor, filed a writ petition challenging a governmental action. The petition was later found to be deficient, prompting the filing of a civil application seeking leave to amend the writ petition as per paragraph 2 of the application. The State of Maharashtra, …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Examination Council and the State were empowered under the Maharashtra State Council of Examination Act, 1998 and the 2010 Regulations to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of about 7,880 candidates after verifying large‑scale mark tampering. …
DISPOSED OFF
Ms G S R Construction, represented by its partner Ganesh Kishanrao Chavan, filed a civil application (No. 8367 of 2026) and a writ petition (No. 161 of 2025) against the State of Maharashtra. The application sought relief concerning office objections raised by the respondents. The High Court, after …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations was empowered under the 1998 Act and the 2010 Regulations to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of about 7,880 candidates after verifying large‑scale mark tampering. The court found ample documentary and police evidence …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The Bombay High Court heard a consolidated group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET‑2018 and TET‑2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations, through its …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Kanwarsingh Ishwar Naik filed a First Appeal (No.27726 of 2019) and a related Civil Application (No.27727 of 2019) but the Registrar rejected registration on 16‑11‑2021 due to office objections. The applicant later filed an application for restoration after a delay of 1,606 days, seeking condonation …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioner, Yashwant Khatrya Wasave, sought restoration of a first appeal (No. 17213 of 2023) after the Registrar of the High Court rejected its registration due to unresolved office objections. The petitioner filed a civil application for restoration after a delay of 1,087 days. The Court …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, Tanveer Sikandar Bagwan, was arrested for allegedly assaulting members of another family with a chopper, causing injuries to the head, ear, and neck and a small intracranial haemorrhage. The prosecution contended that the applicant was the principal assailant and that his release …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, represented by Rehanabai Jahangu Vasave, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 1087‑day delay in applying for restoration of a first appeal (No.17034 of 2023) and the accompanying civil application (No.17035 of 2023). The Registrar had rejected registration of the appeal …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants, Mogaraben and Kantilal, were arrested for the murder of Kantilal Motiram Valvi and sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was repeatedly harassing applicant No.1, leading to a conspiracy with …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench disposed of a large group of writ petitions (904‑931) that raised the entitlement of medical officers to engage in private practice and to receive a Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that it had already decided the matter in a common judgment dated 30 …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner, under the 1998 Act and the 2010 …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, Moju Ranjit Gavit, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 1,087‑day delay in filing a petition for restoration of his first appeal (No. 17303 of 2023) after the Registrar had rejected its registration on 8 August 2023 due to office objections. The Court examined whether …
ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN AT ADMISSION STAGE
The applicant sought condonation of a 1,087‑day delay in filing an application for restoration of a first appeal (No. 17025 of 2023) and the accompanying civil application (No. 17026). The Registrar had rejected registration of the appeal on the ground of outstanding office objections. The court …
DISPOSED OFF
Popat Murlidhar Raut filed a writ petition challenging an order (No. OW/ZPB/Edu./Pri.Div.1-A No.2215/2022 dated 10‑06‑2022) that cancelled his primary graduate pay scale of Rs.9,300‑34,800 plus grade pay of Rs.4,300, which had been granted by an earlier order dated 27‑06‑2014. The petitioner sought …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, heirs of Devja Bapu Walvi, filed a civil application seeking restoration of a first appeal (No.17487 of 2023) and a related civil application (No.17489 of 2023) after the court’s registrar had rejected registration due to unresolved office objections. The rejection was dated 1 …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant sought condonation of a 1087‑day delay in filing an application for restoration of a first appeal (S. No. 17022 of 2023) and the accompanying civil application (S. No. 17024 of 2023) after the Registrar (Judicial) had rejected registration on the ground of office objections. The court …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Nayum Khan, filed a criminal application seeking relief. After the trial court acquitted the accused, the applicant moved the High Court for permission to withdraw the application, arguing that the matter had become infructuous. The learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Rehan Khan, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
In a civil application filed by Smita Sachin Khedkar and others against Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered the request to issue a notice to respondent No.3 by way of paper proclamation. The court, after hearing the parties, allowed the …
Withdrawn
The petitioners, Deepak Bhagwanrao Shinde and another, filed a bail application in the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The State, through its counsel, informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet would be filed within a few days. Consequently, the petitioners …
DISPOSED OFF
Anju alias Anjana RanjU Tambe filed Writ Petition No. 10082 of 2023 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of Respondent No.4 in deciding representations submitted on 21-12-2009, 26-04-2023 and 02-05-2023. The petition sought a directive compelling the respondent to …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The legal heirs of the deceased claimant, Bhausaheb Ramchandra Bhogade, filed a civil application seeking to withdraw compensation that had been deposited with the court after the claimant's death during the pendency of a first appeal. The court noted that the heirs, identified by a death …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimant‑respondent filed a civil application seeking correction of the middle name of applicant No. 4, Santosh Sakharam Gote, which was erroneously recorded as ‘Bijaji’ in the First Appeal. The court noted that the reference court had already corrected the name on 24‑03‑2026. It was further …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for land acquired for the distributary of the Waghur Dam Project, arguing that the reference court failed to consider sale deeds they had produced, which were executed before the acquisition notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained motions to correct a prior order dated 10 July 2026. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and should be removed from the title clause. The acquiring body …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants, owners of land in Nashirabad village, challenged the compensation awarded by the reference court for land acquired for the Waghur Dam distributary project. They submitted certified copies of sale deeds predating the Section 4 notification, arguing that under Section 51A of the Land …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, five Shinde brothers, purchased 57.8 acres of land under a certificate issued pursuant to Section 32M of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Respondent Somnath Shinde sought forfeiture of the land, and the Tenancy Avval Karkun ordered forfeiture under Section …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court considered two criminal applications filed by the original accused in Special Case No. 113 of 2023, seeking suspension of their life and term sentences and bail pending appeal. The accused were convicted under Sections 376‑D, 376‑DA, 363, 366 of the IPC, Section 34, and Sections 4 and …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants – Gautamabai Koli, Shantabai Dhake (deceased) and Namdeo Kolhe – challenged the compensation awarded by the reference court for land acquired for the distributary of the Waghur Dam Project affecting Nashirabad, Bhadali and Bholane villages. They submitted sale deeds predating the …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed an application seeking condonation of delay in filing a criminal revision against Dnyaneswar, who had been discharged by a Special Judge under Sections 3(1)(ii), 3(2) and 3(4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999. The Special Judge held that more …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained motions to correct a previously dated order. Counsel for the appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and should be removed from the title clause. The acquiring body …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant challenged a 2006 judgment awarding compensation for land acquired for a medium project in Dhargir village. The appellant argued that the dispute had already been settled by a National Lok Adalat order dated 08.02.2020 in a related appeal, which fixed compensation rates for jirayat and …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained motions to correct an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 concerning a series of first appeals (including No. 699/2017) relating to compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharashtra. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and …
DISPOSED OFF
Several groups of applicants filed writ petitions (Civil Applications No. 9095-9114 of 2025) against the State of Maharashtra alleging various grievances. The petitions were challenged on procedural grounds, including alleged delay in filing, errors in the prayer clause, and pending office …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) entertained motions to correct a prior order dated 10 July 2026. The appellants argued that First Appeals 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed with First Appeal 699 of 2017 and should be removed from the title clause. The acquiring body pointed out …
DISPOSED OFF
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay heard a series of civil applications (writ petitions) filed by various applicants against the State of Maharashtra and others. The applicants were represented by Mr. S. U. Chaudhari, assisted by Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, while the State was represented …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Narayan and others, filed a contempt petition (No. 376 of 2010) against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The Court had earlier directed respondent No.4, the Executive Engineer, to decide the petitioners' representation. Respondent No.4 filed an affidavit stating that …
DISMISSED
The petitioners, Sandeep Popatrao Kothavade and another, filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench. The court directed them on 20 June 2022 to submit written notes of arguments, which they failed to do. The petitioners also did not appear before the court thereafter. …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, corrected an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 after hearing motions. The court deleted First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 from the title clause, as they were wrongly clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017. It also directed that the claimants be awarded …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench heard a batch of civil applications filed as writ petitions by various applicants against the State of Maharashtra and others. The applicants were represented by Mr. S. U. Chaudhari on behalf of Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, while the respondents were represented …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of writ petitions (Civil Applications No. 9095-9114 of 2025) were filed by various applicants against the State of Maharashtra. The petitions had been delayed, and the respondents raised office objections. The High Court, exercising its inherent powers, condoned the delay, ordered the …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Archana Marotrao Badhe, filed a review application challenging the order dated 01‑07‑2026 that entertained her writ petitions. She contended that the court had not expressly addressed the issue of territorial jurisdiction and argued that a writ of quo warranto could not lie because …
DISPOSED OFF
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay entertained a series of civil applications and writ petitions filed by various applicants against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants sought relief including correction of the prayer clause and removal of office objections. The respondents raised …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Nandkishor Somaji Salve, filed a review application seeking to amend the prayer clause of a writ petition judgment dated 07/07/2025, specifically requesting deletion of paragraph No.8 and Clause (ii) which denied him grade‑pay benefits. He argued that a Government decision dated …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, corrected an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 by deleting First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 from the title clause as urged by the appellants. The court affirmed that the appeals of both the claimants and the acquiring body are partly allowed and …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court corrected an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 by deleting First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 from the title clause as they were wrongly clubbed with Appeal No. 699. The court affirmed that the claimants' appeals are partly allowed and that the acquiring body's appeals are also partly …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants, Anil Baban Barate and others, filed a criminal application and later sought leave to amend it after the charge sheet was filed and cognizance was taken. The learned advocate for the applicants requested the court’s permission to make the amendment. The bench, relying on the Supreme …
DISPOSED OFF
Shri Baban Eknath Garkal filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner alleged that Respondent No.2 had failed to adjudicate several complaints he lodged on 10 September 2024, 7 January …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, corrected an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 after hearing motions to delete two improperly clubbed appeals (Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017) from the title clause. The court affirmed that the claimants are entitled to compensation of Rs.10,48,000 per hectare for …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, employees working in Tribal and PESA areas, filed writ petitions seeking direction to receive the benefits of the one‑step pay‑scale (Eksthar) as per the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The petitioners relied on a prior decision of the same Court in Writ Petition No. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimants filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the amount deposited by the acquiring body as compensation. They argued that other claimants from the same project had been allowed to withdraw 80% of their deposited amounts, and thus they should be granted the same. The court noted that …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, acting as legal representatives of the deceased claimant Sudhakar Yashwant Mane, filed a civil application seeking permission to amend the title clause of an ongoing appeal to include their names. They argued that they were unaware of the court proceedings during the pendency of the …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) entertained a motion to correct the minutes of an order dated 10 July 2026 concerning numerous first appeals arising from land‑acquisition proceedings in Latur. The appellants contended that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed with …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, corrected an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 after hearing motions filed by the appellants and the acquiring body. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 had been improperly clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and should be …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Yogesh Kailas Lahane applied for bail in Crime No. 355 of 2026 for allegedly supplying milk dangerous for consumption. The court ordered a chemical analysis, which found formalin in the milk and classified it as sub‑standard under Chapter I, Section 3(1)(zx) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, …
DISPOSED OFF
Ashok Ishwarappa Dongre filed a writ petition challenging a July 21, 2018 order of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jamkhed, which rejected his application for the appointment of a Court Commissioner in Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 20 of 2013. The petitioner argued that the suit was …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered two writ petitions challenging Clause 3 of a Government Resolution dated 13‑10‑2016, which denied subject‑teacher pay scale benefits to teachers of classes 6‑8. Relying on the Nagpur Bench decision in Ganesh Mahadeo Asekar v. State of Maharashtra, …
Withdrawn
The applicants, Subhash Shahaji Pawar and another, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the investigating agency completed its investigation and filed a charge sheet. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Vaishali S. Nikalje, …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The petitioner filed Criminal Application No. 3200 seeking condonation of a 30‑day delay in filing an appeal, which the Court allowed, thereby condoning the delay and disposing of the application. In Criminal Application No. 3201, the Court issued a notice to the State of Maharashtra, setting a …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Abdul Almas, filed a successive bail application after an earlier bail request was withdrawn by the court. He argued that the trial had progressed, with four eye‑witnesses and a doctor already examined, and that the eye‑witnesses had turned hostile, constituting a change in …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench entertained motions to correct a previously dated order. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were improperly clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 and should be removed from the title clause. The acquiring body pointed out that the …
DISMISSED
The applicant sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 351, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for an alleged assault involving an axe and iron rod. He claimed false implication, presenting hotel photographs to support an alibi that he was away …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) entertained motions to correct a previously dated order. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and should be removed from the title clause. The acquiring body pointed out …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners sought condonation of delays ranging from 918 to 7,182 days in filing civil applications to bring the legal representatives of deceased appellants on record and to set aside the abatement of their claims. The State opposed the applications. The court examined the submissions and …
Withdrawn
Navnath Balaji Shewale filed Criminal Application No. 3189 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After hearing counsel, the Court expressed its disinclination to allow the application. The applicant then sought leave to withdraw the application. The Bench granted leave to withdraw. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners sought condonation of delays ranging from 918 to 7,182 days in filing civil applications to bring the legal representatives of deceased appellants on record and to set aside the abatement of their claims. The State opposed the applications. The court examined the submissions and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …
DISPOSED OFF
Juned Layaque Shaikh and others filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking payment of the salary difference for the period 1‑10‑2020 to 30‑09‑2023, contending that the honorarium for "shikshan sevak" should not apply because their appointment was on a compassionate basis. The …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, Najmeem Dastagir Shaikh, was convicted by a Fast Track Special Court in Dharashiv for an offence under Section 137(2) of the Bombay Nursing Service, receiving a one‑year imprisonment and a fine, which he had already paid. He had been on bail during the trial and filed an application …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, employees working in Tribal and PESA areas, filed writ petitions seeking the benefits of the one‑step pay‑scale (Eksthar) as mandated by the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. They relied on a prior decision of the same Court in Writ Petition No. 248/2026, where similarly …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Ajitsingh Daulatsingh Shiledar, was charged under Sections 132, 79, 351(1) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly abusing officers in a Tahsil office in the presence of female staff. He filed an anticipatory bail application, submitting an affidavit stating that he had …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Suhas Vechya Naik and others, and Ganesh Rupsing Paradke and another, were elected members whose terms expired in 2024. They filed writ petitions (Nos. 9723/2023 and 9667/2023) challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The Court examined whether the petitions remained …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners, who were elected members, filed two writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, it was pointed out that the petitioners' term of office had expired in 2024. The court examined whether the petitions could continue to be entertained after the …
Withdrawn
Shyamrao Daga Patil applied for bail before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the bail application, the investigating agency filed a charge-sheet against the applicant. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to file a fresh …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Balraje Ramrao Aware was arrested in Crime No. 84 of 2026 for alleged unauthorized supply, transportation and installation of statutes, charged under Sections 329(3), 223, 61(2), 353(3), 126(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 11 of the Maharashtra Desecration of Status Act. He filed …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various government employees seeking entitlement to advance increments for work performed before the Government Resolution dated 24 August 2017. The petitioners argued that the resolution should be applied …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Ex. Engineer, M.I.D. Jalna and others (applicant) filed a civil application seeking relief. The court had earlier granted interim relief pending payment of a payable award. The applicant deposited the entire award amount as directed by the court. The court, noting full payment, converted the …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Amol Vasantrao Pohnerkar, filed a civil application seeking an early date of hearing for his pending petition (WP No. 182 of 2009) which had been pending since 2009. The application was presented before a two‑judge bench of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad. The court considered the …
DISMISSED
The petitioner Arvind Shripatrao Patil challenged a Family Court order that rejected his application to invoke Sections 215 and 379 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) against his wife for alleged non‑disclosure of a gifted property. The wife had filed a maintenance petition under …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Balaji Manohar Gawad obtained a compensation award from a tribunal against Reliance General Insurance Company. The insurer deposited the awarded amount as directed by the court. Gawad filed an application to withdraw the deposited compensation. The court examined the competing interests and the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of first appeals challenging the compensation awarded for dry lands acquired from Padali village for the Nimna Dudhna Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appellants argued that the award of Rs 2,500 per R was inadequate and sought …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants, the parents and maternal grandparents of the deceased, appealed against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of Rs.17,41,363 in two claim petitions under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking a different apportionment and enhancement of compensation. The deceased …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, Amar Ashok Karale, filed an application seeking condonation of a 289‑day delay in filing his first appeal. The respondent argued that the applicant had previously deposited over Rs.12,00,000, which had been withdrawn, and therefore no financial hardship existed to justify the delay. …
DISPOSED OFF
The husband and his relatives (father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law, brother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law) applied to quash FIR No.313 of 2025 filed by the wife alleging cruelty and illegal dowry demand under Sections 85 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court observed that the FIR and charge …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Bharti Yogiraj Sonwane and others, filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners repeatedly failed to appear and prosecute the petition, despite adjournments and a final opportunity granted by the court. Respondents, including the State and …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition against M/s Maharashtra Steel. Both parties agreed that the matter had already been decided in the Bombay High Court judgment of 8 April 2014 in Writ Petition No.240/1992. The court held that the parties were ad idem and therefore the present petition …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioner filed Civil Application No. 6404 of 2022 seeking the court's permission to bring the legal representatives of the deceased claimant, Bajirao Babu Keskar, on record in the pending appeal. The application was heard before Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh. The court examined the reasons set …
DISPOSED OFF
Anita Arun Bidgar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner had earlier filed an application on 1 August 2024 which remained pending. The Court examined whether it could intervene to expedite the decision on …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking pensionary benefits from the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners claimed they were entitled to monetary benefits and recalculated pension amounts based on the actuals as of their …
DISMISSED
The Executive Engineer of the Nimn Dudhana Project, acting through the G.M.I.D.C., filed two first appeals against claimants including Balasaheb Sheshrao Mhasrup and Gayabai Jairam Wagh. The claimants sought statutory benefits under the law articulated by the Full Bench of this Court in State of …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Jagannath Namdeo Cholke, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking redress concerning representations he had made on 30 March 2026 and 6 May 2026. The representations were addressed to Respondent No.7, but the petitioner alleged that they had not …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Javed alias Pappu Vishwas Chavan, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel learned that the prosecution would file the charge-sheet the next day. The applicant sought liberty to withdraw the bail application …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Mangal Pandurang Patil and others, filed writ petition No. 11820 of 2021 in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. They were represented by Advocate Mr. Kailas Hande on behalf of Mr. Avinash D. Hande. The petitioners subsequently sought leave of the Court to …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Mayur Sanjay Adhav challenged the seizure of his dumper (MH-12-FZ-5355) and a JCB machine by the Tahsildar under a panchanama dated 23.04.2025. The Tahsildar, without authority under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, issued a show‑cause notice and imposed a penalty of Rs.7,50,000, …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants filed a bail application (Bail Application No. 1449 of 2026) in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. While the application was pending, the charge-sheet was filed, prompting the applicants to seek withdrawal of the bail application and permission to file a fresh bail …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay and stay of an impugned judgment and award. The Court examined whether the delay in filing the applications could be condoned and whether a stay should be granted pending deposit of the enhanced compensation. It …
DISMISSED
Vikram Vinayak Dede applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC. While the application was pending, he was arrested. The applicant's counsel informed the court that the arrest rendered the anticipatory bail application infructuous. The court, noting the change in circumstances, dismissed the …
DISPOSED OFF
Hamidkhan Sarwarkhan Patel filed Writ Petition No. 8979 of 2015 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of Osmankhan Sarwarkhan Patel and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the passage of time had rendered the issues in the petition infructuous. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Manoj Hariram Nirde, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub-Divisional Officer (S.D.O.) of Majalgaon to decide his application for a caste certificate filed on 7 April 2026. The S.D.O. had already rejected the application on 25 July 2026 on the ground that the …