Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 801–1000

DHAVLIRAM BARKU CHARAWANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Dhavliram, an agriculturist, was arrested for alleged cultivation of cannabis (ganja) on his farm, with 350.585 kg of whole plants seized. He sought regular bail, claiming false implication and lack of specific evidence that the seized material constituted the flowering tops defined …

SAROJANI WIRBABU BATHULAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered bail applications filed by three women accused of offences under Section 310(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for alleged participation in a theft conspiracy at a temple crowd. The prosecution’s case relied solely on an informant’s observation of ‘suspicious’ …

SOHEL SALIM HILABIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered multiple bail applications filed by accused persons alleged to have participated in an organized syndicate trafficking codeine‑based cough syrup under the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused procured, transported and distributed the …

BABURAO EKNATH BELOTE AND OTHERSversusTHE JOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER PUNE AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The trustees of Shri Devi Bhoyre Trust sought to replace a century‑old idol in their temple, alleging deformity, while devotees opposed the change. The Joint Charity Commissioner, invoking Section 41‑E of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, restrained the trustees from removing or substituting the …

SAYYED ARBAJ SAYYED FEROJ ALIAS ARBAJ KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court heard multiple bail applications filed by accused persons in a case involving the illegal sale and distribution of codeine‑based cough syrup under the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused were part of an organized syndicate that procured, transported and supplied …

JAVED KHAN RAUF KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court heard multiple bail applications arising from Crime No.279 of 2025 involving the alleged organized trafficking of codeine‑based cough syrup under the NDPS Act, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The applicants argued that they were not identified by witnesses, …

PRADEEP HUKUMCHAND CHUDIWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Pradeep Hukumchand Chudiwal filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction that the Police Complaint Authority (PCA) under Section 22P of the Maharashtra Police Act expedite the hearing of his complaint. The petitioner’s counsel requested leave to add an …

India through the General Manager Central RailwayversusShrihari Shahaji Bade

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a civil application filed by the Union of India (through the Central Railway) against Shrihari Shahaji Bade. The application was pending because a first appeal (No. 645 of 2026) was still before the court. The court observed that since the first appeal …

Uttam Bhaulal KuklareversusThe Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division No 1

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant, Uttam Bhaulal Kuklare, filed an application seeking withdrawal of the entire amount deposited by the acquiring body under an award, together with accrued interest. The Court noted a prior order dated 17.10.2024 in Civil Application No. 5331 of 2024, which allowed similarly placed …

ANUSAYA SHIVAPPA KATKARversusTHE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard multiple writ petitions filed in 2017-2021. The Court directed the petitioners to submit copies of the required documents within two weeks of the order. It warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the petitions without further …

VISHWAS RAGHUNATH BAGALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Indubai Eknath Patil and Vishwas Raghunath Bagale, filed criminal writ petitions challenging certain orders. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, filed applications and produced communications dated 28 September 2020, 31 October 2020 and 3 November 2020. The court examined …

SHAIKH NASEER SHAIKH HASSANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

Shaikh Naseer Shaikh Hassan filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra and others after being directed to submit a representation to Respondent No.2, which was to be decided within two weeks. The petitioner complied, but no decision was rendered, prompting the contempt filing. The …

THE EX. ENGINEER, M.I.W. JALGAON AND ORSversusYOGRAJ JANRAO PATIL AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, Yograj Janrao Patil and others, appealed against a judgment and award dated 02.03.2020 in a land acquisition case, seeking to withdraw a portion of the compensation deposited by the acquiring body. The acquiring body had deposited 78% of the award amount in the High Court after an …

PADMAKAR HARIBHAU MULAY AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition alleging that their grievance under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act had been addressed, the related amount withdrawn, and an appeal pending, but a representation filed on 30.11.2015 with the Chief Administrator of CIDCO remained undecided. They sought a …

RAJKARAN BHANAJI MOREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The petitioner failed to comply with the Court's direction to provide necessary copies for issuing notices to respondents 2 and 3 since 2022, and also did not give instructions to his own counsel. The petitioner was absent from the hearing and appeared uninterested in prosecuting the matter …

MARUTI NAMDEO BAGALversusMANGAL RAJENDRA BAWKE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Maruti Namdeo Bagal filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 20.08.2018 and 14.12.2018 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Shirdi and the Additional Collector, Ahmednagar respectively, which were based on a revenue mutation dated 30.11.2014. The High Court had earlier stayed the …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusMANOHAR MADANLAL RATHI AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company Ltd filed a civil application and first appeal seeking to withdraw its appeal against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambajogai, in favour of the claimants Manohar Madanlal Rathi and others. The insurance company had already accepted the Tribunal’s …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusMANOHAR MADANLAL RATHI AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company (appellant) accepted the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a motor accident claim and filed a withdrawal petition along with an authority letter on 25 March 2026. The appellant sought to have the compensation amount, already deposited with the court …

KISHOR ANKUSH PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Kishor Ankush Pawar, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the bail application. The court considered whether it could grant such permission, noting its inherent …

ANKUSH KISANRAO YELE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, members of the Yele family, sought to quash criminal proceedings (RCC No. 46/2023) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Georai, concerning offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 and 34 IPC. They claimed that the dispute had been settled through a mutual divorce …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusTRAMBAK VITHOBA DHANGAR

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalgaon, which had enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for submergence purposes. The claimant's one‑hectare parcel was originally awarded Rs 8,345, but the Reference Court, on a …

HARIRAM BABURAO KANJEversusMANISHA HARIRAM KANJE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking relief in connection with a pending marriage petition. The marriage petition was subsequently disposed of, eliminating the subject matter of the writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner argued that, with the marriage petition resolved, there was nothing …

SANDEEP@ SANDESH DIWANJI CHANDNEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant was convicted under IPC Section 354 for outraging the modesty of a girl and under Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act for sexual assault of a minor. The trial court relied on the victim’s testimony and documents such as school certificates to establish the girl’s age as 14. On appeal, …

RUPALI BHANUDAS PAWARversusTHE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Bharti Kashinath Thopte, Rupali Bhanudas Pawar, Sachin Vitthal Ghodke and Sampat Bhagwan Ekshinge filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. An order dated 12 February 2026 listed the counsel for the respondents incorrectly, conflating the names of Mr. Laxman H. …

YOGESH VALJI AHIRRAO AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition challenging an FIR that led to criminal prosecution. The accused were acquitted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhule on 06-10-2023. The respondents' counsel argued that, since the accused were acquitted, the petition had become infructuous. The …

PANJAB PRAKASHRAO PATIL AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a public interest litigation seeking to quash a 2015 communication by the Maharashtra Urban Development Department that declared the reservation of certain lands in Hingoli district to have lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, and to …

SYED TAMKIN @ TAMMA S/O. SYED MATINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash proceedings under several IPC offences (Sections 320, 364, 365, 201, 120-B read with 34) and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and the respondent’s counsel informed the court that the …

JIJABAI GHANSHYAM PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

A group of sixteen first appeals arising from land acquisition for the Tapi Minor Irrigation Project in Dhule were filed by appellants dissatisfied with the compensation awarded for their dry lands. The reference Court had fixed compensation at Rs.1,20,000 per hectare (or Rs.1,10,000 for two cases), …

PITAMBAR MAHIPAT CHOUDHARYversusTHE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

A group of sixteen first appeals arising from land acquisition for the Tapi Minor Irrigation Project in Dhule were heard. The appellants, whose dry lands were compulsorily acquired, challenged the compensation awarded, arguing that the rate of Rs.1,20,000 per hectare (or Rs.1,10,000 for two cases) …

RAMDAS CHINDHA PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

A group of sixteen first appeals arose from land acquisition proceedings for the Tapi Minor Irrigation Project in Dhule, where the appellants' dry lands were acquired under compulsory acquisition. The reference court had fixed compensation at Rs.1,20,000 per hectare (or Rs.1,10,000 for two appeals), …

RAMESH CHINDHA PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The High Court heard a group of sixteen first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings for the Tapi Minor Irrigation Project in Dhule, where the appellants’ dry lands were acquired compulsorily and compensation was awarded at Rs.1,20,000 per hectare (or Rs.1,10,000 for two cases). The …

TUKARAM CHINDHA PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

A group of sixteen first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings for the Tapi Minor Irrigation Project in Dhule were heard. The appellants, whose lands were classified as dry land, challenged the compensation awarded by the acquiring authority, arguing that the rate of Rs.1,20,000 per …

SUMAN NANABHAU BEDRE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The mother‑in‑law, father‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of the informant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash FIR No. 1349 of 2024 and the subsequent charge‑sheet for offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 read with Section …

BABAN BALNNA GAWALIversusGANPATI SAMBHAJI POAL

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Baban Balanna Gawali, filed a writ petition but failed to appear in court on the scheduled date, and his counsel was also absent. The respondent, Ganpat Sambhaji Poal, was represented by Advocate S.V. Dixit. The court noted the absence of the petitioner’s counsel on 21/9/2026 and, …

AMOL CHANDRAKANT AMBADEversusKIRTI AMOL AMBADE

DISPOSED OFF

Amol Chandrakant Ambade filed a writ petition (No. 2647 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Kirti Amol Ambade. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the dispute had become infructuous and there was nothing left for the Court to consider. The Court …

WASIM BASHIR PATHAN AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. 0306/2022, which alleged offences under Sections 498‑A, 494, 323, 504 and 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The FIR was lodged by the wife of the first petitioner and implicated the …

VISHAL VIKRAM PATIL AND OTHERSversusASHWINI VISHAL PATIL

Withdrawn

The applicants filed a criminal application seeking relief, but their counsel later moved to withdraw the application. The court entertained the withdrawal request and dismissed the application as withdrawn. No substantive issues were addressed, and the matter concluded without any further orders.

DADASAHEB HAUSRAO KHEDKAR AND ORS.versusBAPU RANGNATH KHEDKAR AND ORS.

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Dadasaheb Hausrao Khedkar and others filed a writ petition seeking relief against respondents. After the Supreme Court’s decision in Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani v. State of Maharashtra, the petitioners moved to withdraw the petition and asked for liberty to approach the Hon’ble …

LAXMAN NIVRUTTI SHINDE and ORSversusDIVISIONAL CONTROLLER MSRTC and ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, including Jeevan Nivrutti Shinde and Laxman Nivrutti Shinde, filed three writ petitions (Nos. 2528, 2530, 2536 of 2004) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Divisional Controller, MSRTC and others. The writ petitions were filed alongside related …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusCHANDRAKANT HARI BADHE

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra sought cancellation of a pre‑arrest bail granted to Chandrakant Hari Badhe in a case involving alleged misappropriation of cooperative society funds and offences under Sections 420 and 406 r/w 34 of the IPC. Earlier bail applications had been rejected by the High Court in …

MANOJ SADASHIV CHOUDHARYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Manoj Sadashiv Choudhary filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to the Superintendent of Police, Beed, to decide a representation dated 12 January 2026. The petitioner argued that his earlier representation on the same matter had been rejected by the Court on its merits. The learned …

SHOBHA RAJU PEHAREversusYASHWANT DHONDIBA SHINDE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Shobha Raju Pehare, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The petitioner later informed the court that an amicable settlement had been reached between the parties outside of court. Consequently, the petitioner’s …

NANA @ NANASAHEB BHIMAJI KOLPEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Nana @ Nanasaheb Bhimaji Kolpe, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the FIR and charge‑sheet alleging his abetment of suicide under Section 306 read with Section 34 IPC. The deceased, Anand, was found hanged and left a suicide note naming the applicant …

Vitthal Mojiram SulaneversusSanjay Belsare

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Vithal Mojiram Sulane filed a continuous petition (No. 143 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After the court indicated it was unlikely to grant any relief, the petitioner's counsel requested to withdraw the petition. The court accepted the request and disposed of …

GURULING KASHINATH PIMPALEversusSTATE OF MAHA and ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, through counsel, informed the court that due to subsequent developments, there was nothing left to consider in the writ petition. The court accordingly disposed of the writ petition as infructuous. Consequently, the rule was discharged and the pending civil applications were also …

SHANKARSINH CHANDSINH THAKURversusBALIRAM BALAJI KALYANKAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Shankarsinh Chandsinh Thakur, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Respondent No.4, represented by Advocate Hamzakhan I. Pathan, informed the Court that the underlying civil suit (R.C.S. No.242 of 216) had been withdrawn. The Court considered whether …

VISHWAS SAMPAT DABHADE AND ANOTHERversusKAJAL LAXMAN DABHADE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The appellants and respondents entered into a compromise, which was verified by the Court's Registrar on 21 September 2026 and recorded as document X‑1. The respondents filed an affidavit (X‑2) confirming that two of the respondents, Gayatri Laxman Dabhade and Aarti Laxman Dabhade, are minors and …

THE STATE OF MAH.versus1. JALINDAR VINAYAK PANDHARKAR and ORS.

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment dated 9 January 2007 of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Shrigonda, which had enhanced compensation in a land acquisition proceeding of 1990. The appellants contended that the reference court’s enhancement of compensation did not exceed four times the …

KHAJABI ISHAQ SAYYED AND OTHERSversusKARBHARI SHIVRAJ AKOLKAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Khajabi Ishaq Sayyed and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of respondents. During the pendency of the petition, the underlying matter, identified as M.A.C.P. No.101 of 2016, was fully disposed by the appropriate authority. …

ARUN BALKRUSHNA SHAHUversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Arun Balkrushna Shahu, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. He had earlier been arrested in connection with a criminal case and subsequently surrendered to the jail authorities. The applicant's counsel argued for his release on bail, while the …

RASHIDABEE AHMAD SAYYEDversusAHMAD DADAMIYA SAYYED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Rashidabee Ahmad Sayyed, filed a writ petition challenging an injunction order dated 25‑11‑2019 and its confirmation on 01‑01‑2020, which restrained him in RCS No. 36 of 2018. He contended that the suit, originally filed in 2018, should be decided within the stipulated time and …

KISHAN GOVINDRAO PAULversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The appellants appealed against a 2015 judgment of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Latur, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded in land acquisition proceedings, contending that the land was irrigated rather than dry as assumed. They submitted that revenue records, borewell installations, …

SAKIB SULEMAN SAUDAGAR AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, comprising the husband, his parents‑in‑law and brothers‑in‑law, sought to quash FIR No. 0643 of 2025 alleging that the complainant (the husband’s wife) had made false and vague accusations of demanding money and subjecting her to cruelty. The FIR, lodged on 4‑Nov‑2025, detailed …

NAMDEO RAMCHANDRA KADUPATILversusBABASAHEB MOHAN YEOLE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Namdeo Ramchandra Kadupatil, challenged the judgment and order in Regular Civil Suit No.149 of 2009 by filing a writ petition. The court observed that an appeal is the appropriate remedy for such a challenge and that a writ petition is not the correct forum. Consequently, the …

BAPURAO GYANBA SONKAMBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The applicant, a director of a multi‑state co‑operative credit society, is in jail and faces thirteen separate criminal cases filed in different police stations across Maharashtra alleging misappropriation of public deposits. He sought an order to club all the proceedings and transfer them to a …

KARIM SHAFIULLA KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA and ANR

DISPOSED OFF

Karim Shafiulla Khan filed two criminal writ petitions seeking remission of his sentence. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been released from jail. The court held that, with the petitioner no longer in custody, there was no longer any relief to be granted …

REKHA YOGESH SHAHversusRAJANI RAJENDRA SHAH AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Rekha Yogesh Shah filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1706 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The application was listed and, upon hearing, the court noted that the anticipatory bail application had already been disposed of. Consequently, the court held that no issue …

ASARAM RAJARAM INGOLE AND OTHERSversusBABASAHEB JANARDHAN INGOLE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed two civil applications seeking condonation of a fifteen‑day delay in filing review applications. The court examined whether such a short delay warranted condonation. Considering the minimal nature of the delay, the court held that it could be condoned. Consequently, the …

ASARAM RAJARAM INGOLE AND ORSversusGANPANT ANNA INGOLE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed two civil applications seeking condonation of a fifteen‑day delay in filing review applications. The court examined whether such a short delay warranted condonation under procedural law. Considering the minimal nature of the delay and the reasons provided, the court found no …

RAVIKANT PADAMSI GOSHARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The appellant, Ravikant Padamsi Goshar, filed a first appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, against a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The appellant's counsel submitted written instructions seeking to withdraw the appeal, which were recorded as Exhibit X. The …

PUSHPA NAGORAO SABNISversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Pushpa Nagorao Sabnis filed a writ petition (WR 6854 of 2014) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. On 20 August 2026, the court recorded the absence of the petitioner's counsel and noted that no representative appeared on the scheduled date. The petition was subsequently posted …

BHAGWAT DNYANOBA MULGIRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Bhagwat Dnyanoba Mulgir, sought quashment of FIR No. 304 of 2025, the charge‑sheet and a pending special case alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (including sections 69, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5), 89) and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of …

DNYANDEO RAMBHAU JAIBHAYversusMANISHA W/O DNYANDEO JAIBHAY AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The applicant, Dnyandeo R. Jaibhay, sought a revision of the Family Court, Beed's orders granting maintenance to his wife and children, which the High Court initially stayed subject to a 50% deposit of the arrears. The stay was later modified, requiring the applicant to deposit Rs.2,00,000 within …

VIKAS RATANLAL JAIN AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Vikas Ratanlal Jain and others, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an unspecified grievance against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court, after hearing counsel, directed the petitioners to approach the State Police Complaint Authority to seek redress. The petitioners' …

GUNWANT SHARADRAO SARAFversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

Gunwant Sharadrao Saraf filed a civil application (No. 3061 of 2019) seeking relief in the context of Writ Petition No. 85 of 2007 against the State of Maharashtra and others. The respondents raised an issue that one of their counsel, Mr. A. S. Bajaj, was no longer on the Municipal Corporation’s …

NIRMALA MANIKRAO LOLAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Nirmala Manikrao Lolam, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. On 19 August 2026, the petitioner, through counsel Shamsunder B. Patil, submitted a written request to withdraw the petition. The court considered the petitioner's request for leave to …

SHUBHAM MADHUKAR KAJALE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, comprising the husband, his parents and sisters‑in‑law, sought quashment of FIR No.992/2024 filed on a complaint by the wife alleging dowry demands, assault and cruelty under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 and 406 IPC. The court examined the FIR and found the allegations …

PRANITA RAMESHRAO GADEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered a large group of writ petitions (numbers 904‑931) that raised the issue of whether Medical Officers are entitled to engage in private practice and receive a Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that the matter had already been decided in a …

SUJEET DADASAHEB NAIKALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench disposed of a large group of writ petitions (904‑931) that raised the entitlement of medical officers to engage in private practice and to receive a Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that it had already decided the matter in a common judgment dated 30 …

RAJESH ANNARAO SONAWANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench disposed of a large group of writ petitions (904‑931) that raised the entitlement of medical officers to engage in private practice and to receive a Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that it had already decided the matter in a common judgment dated 30 …

NITIN BHASKAR LOBHEversusGANESH SHINDE AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

Nitin Bhaskar Lobhe filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 191 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Ganesh Shinde and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and, finding no objection, allowed the …

NARAYAN POSHATTYversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard a series of first appeals filed by numerous claimants against the State of Maharashtra concerning compensation for fruit‑bearing trees affected by land acquisition. The claimants, represented by advocates Rakesh Jain, …

PANDURANG LALU WAGHMAREversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard a large group of first‑appeal petitions filed by various claimants against the State of Maharashtra concerning compensation for land acquisition, including claims for fruit‑bearing trees. The parties, represented by …

SATWA LALU WAGHMAREversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of first‑appeal petitions filed by various claimants against the State of Maharashtra were heard before the National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The claimants sought enhanced compensation for fruit‑bearing trees affected by land acquisition. The parties, …

MAROTI LALU WAGHMAREversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard a large group of first appeals filed by various claimants against the State of Maharashtra concerning compensation for land acquisition. The parties, represented by counsel, presented settlement agreements signed by the …

SAVITA SHIVRAJ KAMBALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Dr. Savita Shivraj Kamble filed a writ petition challenging the non‑performance affidavit (NPA) of doctors. The petition had been pending and an interim relief was in operation. The Court first allowed an application to condone delay, restoring the writ petition to its original position. It then …

BALASAHEV MANIKRAO DUDHATE.versusMADHAV CHANDRAKANT DUDHATE AND OTHER.

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The petitioner, Balasahev Manikrao Dudhate, filed a criminal application seeking condonation of a 36‑day delay in filing a revision application. The court examined whether such a delay could be excused under procedural law. Relying on the reasons set out in the petition, the judge held that the …

Priya Shailesh GohilversusShailesh Lalit Gohil

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant-wife filed an application seeking transfer of a marriage petition (No. A-1863 of 2025) pending before the Family Court in Mumbai to the Family Court at Ahilyanagar, where she resides and has instituted related criminal and maintenance proceedings. The court noted the 250 km distance …

ABDUL GAFFAR ABDUL RAHMANversusSAYED NAWAZALI NIZAMALI

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Abdul Gaffar Abdul Rahman, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After some time, the petitioner, through his counsel, sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request for withdrawal. The bench, presided over by Justice S. …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD BR PARBHANIversusPRABHAKAR CHAPAJI HAKE AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., appellant, filed a first appeal (No. 246 of 2014) which was referred to the National Lok Adalat under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. The appellant, through its counsel Mr M. R. Deshmukh, submitted withdrawal purses and an authority …

THE CHIEF FOREST CONSERVATOR REGIONAL DHULE AND OTHERSversusJEMU JATRYA GAVIT

DISPOSED OFF

The Chief Forest Conservator Regional Dhule and others filed six separate writ petitions challenging interlocutory orders of an Industrial Court. The respondents were various individuals bearing the surname Gavit. After the underlying complaint (ULP) was disposed of, the petitioners moved the High …

THE CHIEF FOREST CONSERVATOR REGIONAL DHULE AND OTHERSversusKANTU RAMYA GAVIT

DISPOSED OFF

The Chief Forest Conservator Regional Dhule and others filed six separate writ petitions challenging interlocutory orders of an Industrial Court. The respondents were various individuals bearing the surname Gavit. After the underlying complaint (ULP) was disposed of, the petitioners moved the High …

YUVRAJ ALIAS JIVRAJ ANNA ANDHALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Yuvraj alias Jivraj Anna Andhale, filed a bail application (938 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 231 OF 2026) before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. After the charge-sheet was filed, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to approach the trial …

SOHEL KARIM SAYYED ALIAS SONU MANSEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The Bombay High Court heard several bail applications filed by accused persons alleged to be part of an organised syndicate trafficking codeine‑based cough syrup under the NDPS Act. The prosecution presented evidence of procurement, financial transactions and coordination among the accused, while …

SANJAY ASARAM GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sanjay Asaram Gaikwad, filed a writ petition (19 WRIT PETITION NO. 1724 OF 2012) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was argued by Mr. Sharayu K. Dhanture on behalf of Mr. R.V. Gore. The Court …

ASHOK CHANDMAL LODHAversusBABURAO ANANDRAO TATHE AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The Court considered Criminal Application No. 489 of 2026 filed by the informant seeking leave to assist the learned applicant. The advocate for the original applicant raised no objection to the request. Consequently, the Court allowed the application. The Court also noted that a connected …

SUNIL PUNAJI DABHADEversusPRAGTIK SHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sunil Punaji Dabhade, filed a writ petition seeking a directive that the Education Officer (Respondent No.2) decide his representation dated 04.01.2021 within a reasonable time. The petitioner argued that the representation was pending without decision. The Court examined the …

THE DIV. CONTROLLER, M.S.R.T.C, DIV. AHMEDNAGARversusAJINATH MANOHAR MOHITE

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The Divisional Controller of MSRTC appealed against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award that granted the claimant, Ajinath Manohar Mohite, compensation on the basis of a 100% permanent and functional disability arising from a head injury. The High Court observed that the claimant neither examined …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusDATTATRAYA S/O. MAHIPATRAO KULKARNI AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra sought leave to appeal an acquittal of a Talathi and his assistant who were charged under Sections 7, 12 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding a bribe to mutate a name in a land record. The Anti‑Corruption Bureau had set up a …

JAYESH PRAKASH PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Jayesh Prakash Patil, applied on 21/09/2013 for a revolver/pistol license, which was rejected by the District Collector, Dhule, on 06/09/2017 and the rejection was confirmed by the Divisional Commissioner on 21/11/2017. He filed a criminal writ petition in 2023 seeking to quash those …

VISHAL S/O. RADHAKISAN MHASKEversusVARSHA W/O. VISHAL MHASKE

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Vishal, filed a criminal application seeking condonation of a 1,007‑day delay in filing a criminal revision before the High Court. The delay pertained to a revision of a family court order dated 23 February 2015, which required the applicant to pay maintenance of Rs.2,500 per month to …

RAJENDRA MAHADU GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

The petitioner, Rajendra Mahadu Gaikwak, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 123 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request for withdrawal. …

BHILA S/O BHIKA PATIL (DIED) THROUGH L.RS. GAYABAI BHILA PATIL AND OTHERSversusTHE COLLECTOR, THROUGH SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, JAYAKWADI PRAKALP NO. 1, AURANGABAD AND ANO

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The claimants filed an appeal after a delay of 4,254 days, which they explained as non‑intentional in their civil applications. The court examined whether such a lengthy delay could be condoned. Finding the explanation satisfactory, the court conditioned the condonation on the claimants giving an …

MANDABAI SAKHARAM JAGTAP (DIED) THROUGH L.RS. AMBADAS SAKHARAM JAGTAP AND OTHERS.versusTHE COLLECTOR, THR SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, JAYAKWADI PRAKALP NO. 1, AURANGABAD AND ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The claimants filed an appeal after a delay of 4,254 days. The court examined the reasons for the delay, finding them satisfactory and not intentional. It therefore condoned the delay, imposing a condition that the claimants provide an undertaking to the Registrar that they will not claim any …

SAKHARAM S/O RANGNATH KULKARNIversusSHIVAJI NAGORAO JADHAV AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 5,423‑day delay in filing an appeal against a 2007 judgment concerning a trust. He claimed to be a member of the trust and therefore an affected person with standing to appeal. The respondents contended that the applicant had no …

SWAYAM GANESH SAWANTversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The appellant, Swayam Ganesh Sawant, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking leave to withdraw the appeal. The learned counsel for the appellant requested the court's permission to withdraw, which the court granted, disposing of the appeal as withdrawn. The …

VIJABAI SURESH EKAMBE AND ORSversusM/S COSMO ROAD LINES AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The case Vijabai Suresh Ekambe and others v. M/s Cosmo Road Lines and others (Civil Application No. 1925 of 2025) was heard before the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The applicants filed an application seeking condonation of delay, relying on the reasons recorded …

PARMESHWAR NAGORAO MORE AND OTHERSversusSAROJA SUDHAKARRAO ARSUDE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Parmeshwar Nagorao More and others, filed a civil application (No. 1727 of 2026) against the respondents, Saroja Sudhakar Rao ArsuDe and others, seeking relief under prayer clauses B and C. The respondents raised office objections to the application. Both parties presented their …

CHATRABHUJ VITTHALRAO CHALAKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Chatrabhuj, was convicted by a Judicial Magistrate and the conviction affirmed by an Additional Sessions Judge for alleged forgery under Section 465 IPC after a police raid seized a fake handicapped identity card he was using to obtain bus fare concessions. He appealed, arguing that …

NANDU BHAGINATH BORSEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Nandu Bhaginath Borse, filed a successive bail application without attaching the earlier order of rejection or showing any new material facts. The State opposed, noting the lack of disclosure and the principle that a later bail plea must be based on a substantial change in …