Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 10601–10800

VADIVEL PversusSTATE OF GOA THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND 2 ORS

Disposed of

The petitioner, Vadivel P, had stood as surety for an accused in a Special Criminal NDPS case. When the accused failed to appear, the petitioner was served notice and the surety amount of Rs.50,000 was forfeited, leading the trial court to direct the bank to freeze the petitioner's savings account. …

ARCHDIOCESE OF GOA AND DAMAN, REP. BY ITS FIN. ADMN./PROCURATOR AND CONST. ATT., FR. NOEL DSOUZAversusTHE COMMISSIONER, CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PANAJI (CCP) AND 2 ORS

Allowed

The Archdiocese of Goa transferred 300.30 sq m of land in 1965 but retained ownership of an 80 sq m portion. In 1984 the Archdiocese sold the 300.30 sq m to Estavao Rodrigues, whose successors (Respondents 2 & 3) claimed a total of 371 sq m and obtained development permission and a construction …

SANTOSH KORVAversusSTATE OF GOA THR THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND ANR

Allowed

Santosh Korva, convicted under IPC sections 363, 376, 506(2) and POCSO Act sections 4, 8, 12, filed a criminal appeal 322 days after the judgment while incarcerated. He applied for condonation of the delay, claiming ignorance of the law and inability to obtain legal advice due to his imprisonment. …

VALLABH P. PRABHUDESSAIversusSTATE OF GOA THR THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS

Disposed of

The High Court examined five writ petitions challenging the Goa Municipalities (Amendment) Ordinance, 2026, which altered the statutory framework for municipal elections just as the terms of eleven municipal councils expired. Petitioners argued that the ordinance violated Articles 14, 213 and 243U …

SANFORD W. FERNANDESversusSTATE OF GOA, THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 12 ORS

Disposed of

The petitioner, Sanford W. Fernandes, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to constitute a demolition squad and to execute demolition of a building. While the petition was pending, the building was demolished, rendering the relief sought moot. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition …

STATE, THROUGH CBI, ACB GOAversusSHIVANAND FAKIRAPPA BACHAGUNDI

Dismissed

The High Court examined the appeal filed by the CBI‑ACB against the acquittal of Shri Shivanand Fakirappa Bachagundi, an Assistant Director and Drawing & Disbursing Officer of MSME‑DI, who was charged with criminal breach of trust, cheating, forgery and corruption relating to the National Vendor …

NEWTON BISHOYI AND ANRversusSTATE THR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND ANR

Partly allowed

The applicants, Newton Bishoyi and another, were granted bail with condition No.6 prohibiting them from leaving India without the trial court's permission. After joining the investigation on 11 May 2026, they applied to the trial court on 12 May 2026 for permission to travel abroad, but the …

ANNA STEELEversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS

Disposed of

The petitioner, Anna Steele, filed writ petitions seeking an OCI card and visa. The Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO) in Mumbai issued the OCI card and visa on 07 September 2026. The Court examined whether the relief sought had been duly granted. Finding that the FRRO had complied with …

ROQUE FREDDIE MENINO EXANO PEREIRA AND ANRversusPRIME BUILDERS AND 13 ORS

Dismissed

The petitioners challenged a Civil Judge's order permitting the plaintiff to add the plaintiff's wife as a defendant (defendant 8A) after the trial had commenced. The petitioners argued that the amendment was filed late, violating the proviso to Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC, and that the issue of …

SURESH DATTU KAMATversusUNION OF INDIA THR THE SECRETARY AND ANR

Rule made absolute

The petitioner, Suresh Dattu Kamat, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order dated 26‑06‑2025 that reopened his income‑tax assessment for AY 2021‑22 under Section 148A(3). The original notice under Section 148A(1) alleged only escaped interest of Rs 2,51,257, which the petitioner …

SMITHA PARULEKAR AND ANRversusYAWAR ZAFAR ALIAS JAFFER SHAIKH AND ANR

Allowed

The applicants, original plaintiffs, sought an injunction in the trial court, which was denied. They filed an appeal against the trial court's order but missed the statutory time limit by 50 days. The applicants moved this Court for condonation of the delay, citing their advanced age (69) and a …

DAMODAR RAMNATH NAIK AND ANRversusSHITESH MORE

Disposed of

The Bombay High Court examined five writ petitions challenging the Goa Municipalities (Amendment) Ordinance, 2026, which altered the composition, delimitation and reservation framework for municipal elections. The petitioners argued that the ordinance violated Articles 14, 213 and the mandatory …

HANUMANT SUBHO GAONKARversusCHETAN L. PATIL AND 2 ORS

Disposed of

The applicant, Hanumant Subho Gaonkar, filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking an early hearing of a group of writ petitions pending before the High Court of Bombay at Goa. The court considered the submissions made by the parties and found no impediment to granting the request. Consequently, …

FREEDA FERNANDESversusDOMNIC ROSARIO RODRIGUES AND ANR

Allowed

Freeda Fernandes, a Portuguese citizen, filed a miscellaneous civil application in the Bombay High Court at Goa under the Portuguese Code of Civil Procedure to have a UK Family Court divorce decree dated 27‑08‑2024 reviewed and confirmed, and to direct the Civil Registrar of Mormugao to cancel the …

RADHIKA R. PANGAMversusVISHAL AVADHUT ZUWARKAR

Allowed

The applicant, Radhika R. Pangam, died on 20 February 2025, and the related Criminal Revision No. 69/2006 was disposed on 4 July 2026. Respondent No.1, Vishal Avadhut Zuwarkar, sought to withdraw a portion of the compensation amount (Rs. 3,00,000) that the applicant had deposited during the pendency …

SAVIO JOAQUIM FILIPE CORREIAversusSANJAY HALANKAR

Disposed of

The applicant, Savio Joaquim Filipe Correia, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking correction of an order dated 29 April 2026 issued in Writ Petition No.1837/2025(F). He contended that paragraph 3 of that order was erroneously recorded, as no party had requested a deferral of the …

MR. FRASER FERNANDESversusNEAL DIAS

Allowed

The applicant, Mr. Fraser Fernandes, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking an early listing of his writ petition (No. 1905 of 2023) before the High Court of Bombay at Goa. The court considered the submissions made and the nature of the underlying litigation. It found that the applicant’s …

EZLINDA FERNANDESversusMARIO JOHN PEREIRA AND ANR

Dismissed for non prosecution

The petitioner, Ezlinda Fernandes, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa. The case was repeatedly adjourned at the petitioner's request, with dates extending from January to July 2026. On several occasions, the petitioner's counsel, appointed through Legal Aid Services, failed to …

PREMNATH GADEKAR AND 7 ORSversusPRAMILA PREMNATH GADEKAR AND 3 ORS

Disposed of

The applicants filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a six‑day delay in filing a revision against a judgment dated 3 June 2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No. 117/2022. The court examined the reasons for the delay and found that sufficient …

HANUMANT ESHWAR PIRANKAR.versusDEVIDAS NILKANTH KALANGUTKAR.

Dismissed

The appellant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act alleging that two cheques of Rs.50,000 each were dishonoured and were issued as part payment for the sale of an Eicher tipper. The trial court acquitted the accused, holding that the complainant failed to establish a …

SURESH GANAPAT BASUTKARversusSTATE OF GOA THR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND 3 ORS

Dismissed

Suresh Basutkar filed Criminal Writ Petition No.733 of 2026 in the High Court of Bombay at Goa against the State of Goa through the Public Prosecutor. The petition was initially taken on board but the petitioner, through his learned advocate Ms. Prachi Sawant, instructed the withdrawal of the …

RIYAZ SOMANIversusTHE POLICE INSPECTOR ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING AND 2 ORS

Disposed of

The petitioner, Riyaz Somani, filed a criminal writ petition challenging a police communication that refused to register an FIR based on his complaint. He had already filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.163/2026 before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class at Mapusa, invoking Section 175(3) …

SANIKSHA NIPANIKARversusSTATE OF GOA THR THE POLICE INSPECTOR AND 3 ORS

Disposed of

The applicant, Saniksha Nipanikar, filed a criminal transfer application seeking to move Criminal Case No. IPC/74/2017/B from the Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C., B Court, Bicholim to a competent court at Margao for trial. The applicant argued that the trial had progressed with four …

ISHWARYA DAMODAR KAKULEversusPARAM SHANTARAM ZANZAL

Disposed of

The petitioner, a mother of a four‑year‑old child, filed a writ petition seeking an order that her interim custody application pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mapusa be heard expeditiously, along with visitation rights. She alleged that the respondent had denied her access to the …

NEIL MONTEIROversusSTATE OF GOA THR THE OFFICER IN CHARGE AND ANR

Disposed of

Neil Monteiro filed a criminal revision challenging an order that allowed the prosecution to re‑examine the Investigating Officer despite his earlier non‑appearance. The Judicial Magistrate First Class had closed the officer’s evidence because he failed to appear when his testimony was listed. The …

FELICIDADE RODRIGUES AND 10 ORS.,versusFRANCIS DCOSTA AND 11 ORS.,

Allowed

In a Miscellaneous Civil Application filed within a second appeal, the applicants sought to amend the cause title to indicate that Appellant No. 8 had died. The death certificate of Appellant No. 8 was placed on record. The Registrar considered whether the amendment was permissible under procedural …

MAMLATDAR OF BARDEZ, THR. MAMLATDARversusUMESH KUMAR PARASHAR

Disposed of

The petitioner, Mamlatdar of Bardez, filed a writ petition seeking an extension of time to dispose of mutation proceedings pending before him. The respondent opposed the application, arguing that the statutory period should not be altered. The High Court examined whether the court could grant a …

CAESAR VAZversusRONALD GAMA

Disposed of

The Trial Court had ordered the applicant, Caesar Vaz, to keep a deposit of Rs 1.80 crore as security while restraining the respondent, Ronald Gama, from creating any third‑party rights over the suit property pending the Special Civil Suit No. 18/2017/A. The applicant later sought release of the …

M/S. PUMA STATIONERY PRIVATE LIMITED. THR OFFICIAL LIQUIDATORversusNO PARTY

Disposed of

A.W. Faber‑Castell (India) Pvt. Ltd. filed a winding‑up petition against Puma Stationery Private Ltd., alleging that the company failed to pay dues of Rs.4,70,02,812 despite statutory notice under Section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, and that it had no assets after a fire. The company was served …

TEODOLINDA DIAS MANDOLYversusCONCEICAO BARRETO ( SINCE DEC.) THR LRS

Partly allowed

Petitioner Teodolina Dias Mandoly challenged a series of orders that declared Concepção Barreto as the mundkar of Survey No.124/7, land originally owned by her late father Felix Antonio Jose Dias Mandoly and uncle Dr. Antonio Dias Mandoly. The original owners were never joined as parties in the …

PAPPU CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GOA THR THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND ANR

Withdrawn

Petitioner Pappu Chauhan filed a criminal writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa. The petitioner’s counsel, Rohan P. Desai and Ashay Priolkar, sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the request and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of …

SHANTA LAXMAN CHAUHAN AND 4 ORSversusPRAKASH MAHOTE AND 4 ORS

Allowed

The applicants filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking the withdrawal of fifty percent of the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) in a motor accident case. Applicant No.1, the grandmother, was appointed guardian ad litem for the mentally challenged Applicant …

NISHA @ NEETUversusSUNIL KUMAR

Allowed

The applicant, Nisha @ Neetu, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Application seeking permission to amend the appeal memorandum in First Appeal No. 59/2026. The respondent, Sunil Kumar, raised objections to the amendment. The High Court, after considering the applicant’s reasons and the respondent’s …

PRAMOD R. PANDEYversusSTATE OF GOA THR ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS

Disposed of

Petitioner Pramod R. Pandey filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking directions for the disposal of Panchayat Petition No.30/2020. Respondents, the State of Goa and its officials, through Additional Government Advocate S.P. Munj, assured that the Panchayat Petition would …

DEVENDRA KUNDAIKARversusSTATE OF GOA THR CHIEF SECRETARY AND 3 ORS

Partly allowed

The petitioner, Mr. Devendra Kundaikar, complained to the Corporation of Panaji about illegal repair work by respondent No.3 that violated a repair licence and caused structural damage. The corporation issued a work‑stoppage order and a show‑cause notice on 14 May 2026, which was later revoked on 7 …

ULHAS MORAJKARversusANAND TULASKAR AND ANR

Disposed of

Ulhas Morajkar, who served as Sarpanch of Sangolda Village Panchayat from 2017 to 2022, was accused of withdrawing Rs 8,70,935 of Panchayat funds without following statutory procedures. After his term ended, he was re‑elected as a Panchayat member for the 2022‑2027 term. In August 2023, a complaint …

SHYAMSUNDER KOTHWALE AND ANRversusRUKMINI VITHAL PINGULKAR AND 10 ORS

Allowed

The applicants sought to amend the cause title of a civil suit to include the legal representatives of deceased respondents No.5 and No.10. The respondents gave no objection to the amendment. The High Court, after noting the lack of objection, ordered that the legal representatives of the deceased …

Kamal Nilkant NaikversusVPK Urban Co operative Credit Society Ltd

Rule made absolute

Mrs. Kamal Nilkath Naik was sued by VPK Urban Co‑operative Credit Society for dishonour of a cheque issued towards repayment of a Rs.45 lakh loan, invoking Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. She filed an application under Section 145(2) of the same Act seeking permission to cross‑examine …

SELIA ANGELA ESMERALDA FERNANDESversusMICHAEL FERNANDES AND ANR

Allowed

Michael Fernandes and his wife, Selia Angela Esmeralda Fernandes, were married in Goa in 2001 and obtained a divorce decree dated 16 January 2026 from the HM Courts & Tribunal Service (a foreign court). They filed separate miscellaneous civil applications in the Bombay High Court at Goa under …

SUMITRA MORASKARversusTHE STATE OF GOA THR ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS

Disposed of

The petitioner filed a complaint under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, which the Deputy Collector, acting as Maintenance Tribunal, claimed to have disposed of. The petitioner contested the correctness of that statement. The government counsel clarified that the …

GURU MADARversusCOMMUNIDADE OF MORMUGAO REP BY ITS ATTORNEY

The Communidade of Mormugao filed a suit concerning alleged illegal construction, which the defendant sought to have dismissed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC on two grounds: that Article 371 of the Code of Communidade bars such suits and that the Communidade’s attorney lacked authority under …

GURU MADARversusCOMMUNIDADE OF MORMUGAO REP BY ITS ATTORNEY

Disposed of

The Communidade of Mormugao filed a suit concerning alleged illegal construction, which the defendant sought to have dismissed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC, arguing that Article 371 of the Code of Communidade barred civil court jurisdiction and that the Communidade's attorney lacked authority …

MARIA LOBOversusVILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF MOIRA THR ITS SECRETARY/SARPANCH

Disposed of

Maria Lobo filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking the court's permission to serve the second and third respondents by affixation of notice, invoking Order 5 Rule 20(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The applicant’s counsel argued that such service was necessary for the proceeding. The …

FRANCISCO FERNANDESversusTHE STATE OF GOA THR THE POLICE INSPECTOR AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Francisco Fernandes, was implicated in alleged forgery of land‑record mutation documents concerning three properties in Colva, based on a complaint by family members. He applied for pre‑arrest bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after an …

SURAJIT GANGULYversusSTATE OF GOA THR THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND 2 ORS

Partly allowed

Petitioner Surajit Ganguly, charged under IPC, the Goa Children’s Act and POCSO for alleged sexual offences, sought a forensic clone of the mobile phone data that the prosecution intended to rely upon. The trial court, following an order dated 02.05.2022, allowed only supervised viewing of the data …

ANNA MATKOVSKAIAversusUNION OF INDIA THR MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS AND 3 ORS

Disposed of

Ms. Anna Matkovskaia, a Russian national, was detained by the FRRO in Goa on 27 March 2026 for lacking a valid passport and visa after her tourist visa expired in 2018 and her passport in 2023. She had been charged and granted bail in two NDPS cases, with conditions to surrender her passport and not …

SAMEER CHANDRAKANT NAIK AND 4 ORSversusTATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD

Disposed of

The applicants, Sameer Chandrakant Naik and four others, filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking withdrawal of part of the compensation of Rs.53,87,368 deposited with the court in a claim against Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. The applicants explained that the deceased’s daughter …

HARSHAD HIRU NAIKversusUNION OF INDIA THR MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS AND 2 ORS

Disposed of

Harshad Hiru Naik filed a writ petition challenging actions of the Union of India and others. Respondent No.3 replied on 4 September 2026, prompting the Court to direct the petitioner to invoke the remedy under Rule 3A of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics …

Gaurav BidreversusState of Goa Through Public Prosecutor and other

Rejected

Gaurav Bidre, charged under IPC sections 365, 342, 302 and 201, applied for bail for the fourth time before the Bombay High Court, Goa Bench. He has been in custody since 24 June 2022 and argues that the delay in trial violates his Article 21 right to a speedy trial. The prosecution and an …

MR. MAHESH VAMAN MANERKARversusSTATE OF GOA,THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY,

Withdrawn

The petitioner, Mahesh Vaman Manerkar, filed a writ petition seeking pensionary benefits of Rs.32,12,845 from the Valpoi Municipal Council. The council affirmed that the full amount had already been paid, and the petitioner, through his counsel, applied to withdraw the petition. The High Court …

GAURISH KAISARE (PRESENTLY JUDICIAL CUSTODY LODGED IN COLVALE) THR NEXT FRIEND GAURI GAURISH KAISAREversusDEENDAYAL NAGARI SAHAKARI PATHA SAUNSTHA MARYADIT THR DHANRAJ DATTA SHET VERNEKAR AND ANR

Disposed of

The applicant, Gaurish Kaisare, who was in judicial custody, filed criminal miscellaneous and revision applications seeking to have the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act compounded after paying full compensation to the first respondent, Deendayal Nagari Sahakari Patha …

SHAMBHU NATH SINGHversusTHE STATE OF GOA THR THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND ANR.,

Withdrawn

The petitioner, Shambhu Nath Singh, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 413 of 2026 in the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking permission to withdraw the petition. He requested liberty to pursue a pending application or file a fresh application for compliance of an order dated 5 April 2024 passed in …

MARIO RONALDO PEREIRAversusSTATE OF GOA THR CHIEF SECRETARY AND 8 ORS

Disposed of

The Village Panchayat Secretary filed an affidavit confirming compliance with the High Court's order dated 13 July 2026, noting that respondents 7, 8 and 9 had removed the shutters on a covered garage/car parking area. The Court examined whether the reliefs sought in the writ petition had been …

ANGELA FERNANDES (DEC) THR. LRS.versusMARIA CARMELINA ALMEIDA

Dismissed

The landlord-respondents filed an application on 15 April 2026 seeking to withdraw rent that the tenant-petitioner had been depositing in court as per an earlier order. The court had previously directed the petitioner to deposit Rs.15,000 per month in court and allowed the sole respondent to …