Bombay High Court
ASHOK DATTATRAYA KARE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY PANNING DEPARTMENT (EGS)
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court directed Respondent No.2 to decide the petitioners' representation on its merits within twelve weeks, thereby disposing of the writ petition.
Summary
Petitioners Ashok Dattatraya Kare and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of Respondent No.2 regarding a representation dated 6 March 2026. The petition sought a directive for the Respondent to consider the representation on its merits. The Court examined whether the administrative authority was obligated to decide the representation within a reasonable time. Finding no substantive hearing had been held, the Court ordered Respondent No.2 to decide the matter on its merits within twelve weeks of receiving the order. The writ petition was consequently disposed of by this direction.
Issues considered
- Whether Respondent No.2 is required to decide the petitioners' representation dated 6 March 2026 on its merits within a reasonable time
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- administrative law
- high court order
- disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:36735-DB
wp10255-26.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.10255 OF 2026
Ashok Dattatraya Kare and Others PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. Shashikant E. Shekade, Advocate for the Petitioners
Mr. N. S. Tekale, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]
DATE : 17th AUGUST, 2026
ORDER :
The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent
No.2 to take decision on the representation of the Petitioners,
dated 6th March, 2026, on its own merits, within a period of 12
weeks from the date of receipt of coy of this order.
[ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp10255-26.doc
Checking your session…