Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GANESH SHAMRAO KHARATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The court may suspend a short-term sentence under Cr.P.C. s.389(1) pending appeal when the appellant is on bail and the fine has been paid.

Summary

Ganesh Shamrao Kharat, convicted in Sessions Case No. 14/2019, sought suspension of his short-term imprisonment under an interim application, claiming the fine was paid and he was on bail. The State opposed, asserting the conviction was proven beyond reasonable doubt. The Court noted that a full merits review would be appropriate at the final hearing and, invoking its power under Cr.P.C. s.389(1), decided to suspend the sentence pending appeal. It ordered the applicant to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and surety, and to report quarterly to the Additional Sessions Judge. The interim application was therefore allowed, and the sentence suspended.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court can suspend a short-term sentence under Cr.P.C. s.389(1) pending the final disposal of an appeal
  • Whether bail can be granted after suspension of the sentence

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • suspension of sentence
  • interim application
  • criminal appeal
  • bail
  • CrPC section 389
  • short-term imprisonment

Judgment

                                            1
                                                                 51-IA-105-2026 (CR).DOC


                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                        CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                    CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 105 OF 2026
                                      IN
                          CR. APPEAL NO. 1008 OF 2025

                                Ganesh Shamrao Kharat
                                       VERSUS
                               The State Of Maharashtra

        Mr. Rahul P Kasbekar, Advocate for Applicant
        Mr. Nitin B. Patil APP for the State

                                CORAM       :     SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                DATE        :     18th MARCH 2026.
        P.C.

        1.     Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned app

        for the respondent-State.

        2.     By this application, the applicant is seeking suspension of

        sentence imposed upon him by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaduj

        vide Judgment and Order dated 26/06/2025 in Sessions Case No.

        14/2019.

        3.     Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the fine amount

        is deposited. The applicant was on bail during the pendency of the

        trial. If the applicant released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty.

        Hence, prayed to allow the application.

        4.     It is contention of learned APP that the prosecution has proved

        the case beyond reasonable doubt. The Trial Court has rendered a

Iresh
                                              2
                                                               51-IA-105-2026 (CR).DOC


        well reasoned order. As such, no interference is warranted. Hence,

        prayed to reject the application.

        5.    Having heard the matter at length, learned counsel for the

        applicant has advanced various submissions, touching the merits of

        the case and alleged infirmities in the order under challenge. Those

        submissions at this stage have been noted.

        6.    However, this Court is of the view that a detailed examination

        of those aspects would necessarily require appreciation of the entire

        evidence on record which would be more appropriately taken at the

        stage of final hearing. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on

        the merits of the case and keeping all issues open for consideration at

        the time of final disposal of appeal, I am inclined to exercise power

        under section 389(1) of the Cr.P.C.

        7.    Moreover, it is unlikely that the appeal will be heard and

        concluded in the near future. Considering that the sentence imposed

        upon the applicant is a short term sentence, I pass following order:

                                       ORDER

        I.    The interim application is allowed.

        II.   The substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed upon the

              applicant by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaduj vide

              Judgment and Order dated 26/06/2025 in Sessions Case No.

              14/2019, is hereby suspended.

Iresh
                                                   3
                                                                     51-IA-105-2026 (CR).DOC


        III.   The applicant Ganesh Shamrao Kharat be enlarged on bail on

               furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten

               thousand only) and one solvent surety in the like amount.

        IV.    Applicant shall mark his presence before Additional Sessions

               Judge, Vaduj once in three months on the date assigned by the

               concerned court.



                                                          (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)




                        IRESH       Digitally signed by
                                    IRESH MASHAL

                        MASHAL      Date: 2026.03.26
                                    19:06:31 +0530




Iresh


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.