Bombay High Court
SUDARSHAN CHANDRASHEKHAR DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
Holding
The High Court allowed the application, granting bail and suspending the sentences pending the appeal.
Summary
The applicant, Sudarshan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij, of offences under Sections 353, 332 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, receiving simple imprisonment of six months, three months and corresponding fines, all of which were suspended by the trial court. During the trial he was released on bail and did not misuse his liberty. He filed a criminal application seeking bail pending appeal, arguing that the sentences were short and he posed no flight risk. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, held that the short duration of the sentences justified release on bail and ordered the suspension of the substantive sentences until the appeal is decided. Consequently, the court granted bail on the condition of a cash bond and surety of Rs.30,000 and directed that the suspended sentences remain in force pending the appeal.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending the appeal against his conviction and sentence
- Whether the substantive sentences should be suspended pending the appeal
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 332, 353, 504
Subjects
- bail
- criminal appeal
- suspension of sentence
- IPC
- simple imprisonment
- court order
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:22015
(1) appln-1971-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1971 OF 2026
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.407 OF 2026
SUDARSHAN S/O CHANDRASHEKHAR DESHMUKH
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
…
Mr. Mahesh Kale h/f Mr. Rajeev T. Deshmukh, Advocate for
Applicant.
Mr. A. A. A. Khan, APP for Respondents-State.
...
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
(VACATION COURT)
DATE : 28th MAY, 2026.
P.C:-
1. Heard learned Advocate appearing for applicant and
learned APP appearing for respondent/State.
2. The applicant has been convicted for offence punishable
under Sections 353 and 332 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced
to suffer simple imprisonment for period of six months
respectively with fine and Section 504 of Indian Penal Code and
sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for period of three
months with fine. The substantive sentence imposed upon
applicant is suspended by Trial Court.
3. Perusal of record indicates that applicant was enlarged on
bail during course of trial. He has not misused liberty.
(2) appln-1971-2026
4. Considering short sentence, case is made out to release him
on bail pending Appeal. In result, following order is passed:
ORDER
a. Criminal Application is allowed.
b. The substantive sentence imposed on applicant vide
judgment and order dated 09.04.2026 passed by Additional
Sessions Judge, Kaij, Dist. Beed in Sessions Case No.25/202,
whereby he has been convicted for offence punishable under
Section 353 and 332 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to
undergo Simple Imprisonment for six months and to pay total fine
of Rs.2000/-, in default, to suffer Simple Imprisonment for fifteen
days and Section 504 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to
undergo Simple Imprisonment for three months and to pay fine of
Rs.500/-, in default, to suffer Simple Imprisonment for ten days,
are suspended till conclusion of Appeal.
c. The applicant be released on bail on executing P.B. and S.B.
of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) with one solvent
surety in like amount.
d. Bail before trial Court.
(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR)
JUDGE
Devendra/May-2026
Checking your session…