Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AMBADAS LAXMAN GAVADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS..

Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the interim application and disposed of it as withdrawn without hearing on merits.

Summary

The applicant, Ambadas Laxman Gavade, filed an interim application seeking suspension of his substantive sentence and release on bail pending the hearing of his criminal appeal. The application was filed before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, under Criminal Appeal No. 18 of 2026. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Ritesh M. Thobde, requested leave to withdraw the interim application, a request that was not opposed by the respondents' counsel. The Court, after noting the request, granted leave to withdraw the application. Consequently, Interim Application No. 349 of 2026 was disposed of as withdrawn without being heard on its merits.

Issues considered

  • What procedural requirements govern the withdrawal of an interim application in criminal proceedings?
  • Whether the court may permit withdrawal of an application seeking suspension of sentence and bail without hearing on merits.

Subjects

  • interim application
  • withdrawal
  • criminal appeal
  • bail
  • suspension of sentence
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                                                               942 - CRI IA - 349 - 2026.docx


                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
VAIBHAV
                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
RAMESH
JADHAV
Digitally signed by
VAIBHAV RAMESH
JADHAV
Date: 2026.09.10
10:08:13 +0530
                                CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 349 OF 2026
                                                    IN
                                      CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2026

                      Ambadas Laxman Gavade                               … Applicant
                                   V/s.
                      The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                     … Respondents

                      Mr. Ritesh M. Thobde with Mervin Bardeskar for the
                      Applicant.
                      Dr. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State.
                      Mr. Ishan Kapse with Sairaj Suryavanshi for Respondent
                      No.2.



                                                       CORAM          : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

                                                       DATED          : SEPTEMBER 9, 2026
                      P.C.:


                      1.      By the present Application, the Applicant has sought for the

                      following substantive relief.

                                   “b.    The substantive sentence imposed upon the Applicant vide
                                   Judgment/Order dated 06.12.2025 passed by the Special Judge
                                   (POCSO), Solapur in Spl. Case No.300/2020, be suspended and the
                                   Applicant be released on bail, pending the hearing and final disposal
                                   of the present criminal appeal;”

                      2.      Mr. Ritesh M. Thobde, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on

                      instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present

                      Application. This request is not opposed by Mr. Ishan Kapse, learned




                      VRJ                                                                                  1
                                                   942 - CRI IA - 349 - 2026.docx


Advocate for Respondent No. 2, and Dr. A. A. Takalkar, learned APP for

the State.


3.    In view of the statement made by Mr. Ritesh M. Thobde, learned

Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present

Interim Application.


4.    Interim Application No. 349 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn.


5.    This Application was not heard on merits and has been disposed

of in view of the simple request for withdrawal.




                                          (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)




VRJ                                                                            2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.