Bombay High Court

PRASHANT MADAN PATILversusstate of maharashtra

Decided: 16 September 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The court held that the interim relief sought in prayer clauses (a) and (b) must be granted, directing removal of the office objections within two weeks.

Summary

Mr. Prashant Madan Patil filed a writ petition (L) No.16013 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. An interim application was filed seeking relief under prayer clauses (a) and (b). The court examined the merits of the interim relief and found that the petitioner’s request to have the office objections removed was justified. Accordingly, the court allowed the interim application, directing that the office objections be removed within two weeks from the date of the order. The interim application was thereafter disposed of.

Issues considered

What relief, if any, should be granted under the interim application’s prayer clauses (a) and (b) concerning the removal of office objections?

Subjects

interim relief
writ petition
office objections
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                         42. IA38344-2025.doc

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                       INTERIM APPLICATION NO.38344 OF 2025
                                         IN
                         WRIT PETITION (L) NO.16013 OF 2025

Mr. Prashant Madan Patil                     …    Applicant/Petitioner
          Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors.                  …    Respondents
                                  …..
Mr. Arvind Taral for the Applicant/Petitioner.
Mr. S.H. Kankal, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
                                  …..

                                    CORAM: M.S. KARNIK &
                                           SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

                                    DATED : 16th SEPTEMBER 2026
P.C.

1.        Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant/Petitioner.


2.        For the reasons stated in the Interim Application, the

Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).


3.        The Office Objections to be removed within two weeks from

today.




RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                       1/2
                                                        42. IA38344-2025.doc

4.        The Interim Application stands disposed of.



(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                          (M.S. KARNIK, J.)




RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                      2/2
              Digitally signed
              by RAJESH
RAJESH        VASANT
VASANT        CHITTEWAN
CHITTEWAN     Date:
              2026.09.17
              18:40:19 +0530

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…