Bombay High Court
SANGRAM SHIVAJI VIDHATEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court directed that the petitioner's application for the Customs pass be decided in accordance with law within four weeks, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a directive that his application for a Customs pass containing a QR code, submitted through the Custom Broker Licensing Management System (CBLMS) portal, be decided in accordance with law. The respondents, the Union of India and another, initially sought time for instructions and later indicated that the application could be processed as per the prescribed legal procedure. The Court, without expressing any view on the merits, ordered that the application be decided within four weeks of the order being served on the concerned officer. It clarified that all contentions of the parties remain open. Consequently, the petition was disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the Court should direct the authorities to decide the petitioner's application for a Customs pass with QR code within a specified time and in accordance with law
Subjects
- Customs pass
- QR code
- CBLMS
- Administrative law
- Writ petition
- Procedural compliance
Judgment
906-WP-4635-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4635 OF 2026
Sangram Shivaji Vidhate .....Petitioner
Versus
The Union of India & Anr. .....Respondents
.....
Ms. Pankti Shah for the Petitioner.
Ms. P. Cardozo a/w Ms. Suman Kumar Das for the Respondent Nos.1
and 2.
..…
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK &
SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 8th OCTOBER, 2026
P.C.:-
1. The petitioner is seeking a relief that the application of the
petitioner for issuance of Customs pass containing QR code on his
valid G-Card licence through Custom Broker Licensing Management
System (CBLMS) Portal be decided in accordance with law.
2. When the matter was called yesterday, the learned Counsel for
the respondent Nos.1 and 2 took time to take instructions in the
matter. Today, the learned Counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2
states that the application can be considered as per the procedure
Wakodikar 1/2
Digitally signed
by RUPALI
RUPALI RAJESH
RAJESH WAKODIKAR
WAKODIKAR Date:
2026.10.09
11:22:21 +0530
906-WP-4635-2026.doc
prescribed in law. Hence, we dispose of the present petition by
passing the following order :
ORDER
(I) The application of the petitioner be decided in
accordance with law, within a period of four weeks
from the date of presenting a copy of this order to the
concerned officer.
(ii) It is made clear that we have not expressed
any opinion on merits of the case and all contentions
of all parties are kept open.
(iii) Petition is accordingly disposed of.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.)
Wakodikar 2/2
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.