Bombay High Court
RAOSAHEB NANASAHEB RUPNAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The Court allowed the complainant to intervene in the bail application and permitted the amendment to add the complainant as Respondent No.3.
Summary
The Intervener, Raosaheb Nanasaheb Rupnawar, who is the complainant in Crime No. 137 of 2026, filed an interim application seeking to intervene in Bail Application No. 658 of 2026 filed by Anil @ Anandrao Hanumant Rupnawar. The Applicant’s counsel and the State’s counsel did not oppose the request. The Court, noting the lack of objection, allowed the Intervener to intervene as sought. The Court also granted permission to amend the bail application to join the complainant as Respondent No.3. The interim application was thereafter disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether a complainant in a criminal case may be permitted to intervene in a bail application filed by the accused.
- Whether the bail application may be amended to add the complainant as a respondent.
Subjects
- bail
- intervention
- amendment
- criminal procedure
- complainant
- interim application
Judgment
907-IA-482-2026 (CR).docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 482 OF 2026
IN
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 658 OF 2026
Raosaheb Nanasaheb Rupnawar …........Intervenor
In the matter between :-
Anil @ Anandrao Hanumant Rupnawar …........Applicant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ….......Respondents
——————
Mr. Sachin M. Bhavar for the Applicant/Intervenor in IA/482/2026.
Mr. Anand S. Patil for Applicant in BA/658/2026.
Dr. A.A. Takalkar, A.P.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2-State.
——————
Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
Date : 30th September 2026.
PER COURT :
1. Mr. Sachin Bhawar, learned Advocate for the Applicant in
IA/482/2026, states that the Intervener is the Complainant in Crime No. 137
of 2026 registered with Natepute Police Station, Solapur Rural. He therefore
seeks intervention in Bail Application No. 658 of 2026.
2. The request of the Intervener is not opposed by Mr. Anand Patil,
osk 1 of 2
907-IA-482-2026 (CR).docx
learned Advocate for the Applicant in Bail Application No. 658 of 2026 and
Dr. Takalkar, learned A.P.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2-State.
3. In view of the no objection of Mr. Anand Patil, learned Advocate for the
Applicant in Bail Application No. 658 of 2026 and Dr. Takalkar, learned A.P.P.
for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2-State, the Interim Application is allowed in
terms of prayer clause (a).
4. Consequently, the Intervener is permitted to intervene in Bail
Application No. 658 of 2026.
5. Mr. Anand Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant, seeks permission
to carry out the amendment. Permission is granted. Amendment be carry
out forthwith by joining the complainant / informant as Respondent No.3.
6. Intervention Application No. 482 of 2026 stands disposed of.
[ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ]
Digitally signed
by OMKAR
OMKAR SHIVAHAR
SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN
KUMBHAKARN Date:
2026.09.30
20:09:57 +0530
osk 2 of 2
Checking your session…