Bombay High Court
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusBHUMSING UDAYSING KACHAVAY
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The court held that the 47‑day delay is condoned as the State demonstrated sufficient cause.
Summary
The State of Maharashtra filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 47‑day delay in filing a leave application for appeal (ST No. 3785 of 2026). The respondent, Bhumsing Udaysing Kachavay, did not appear despite service and filed no reply. The court examined the averments made in the State's application and considered the length of the delay. Finding that sufficient cause was shown for the delay, the court granted the condonation. Consequently, the interim application was disposed and the matter was listed for further hearing on 20 November 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 47 days in filing a leave application for appeal can be condoned.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- leave to appeal
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- procedural law
Judgment
40-IA-654-2026.doc
Digitally IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
signed by
HUSENBASHA
HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
RAHAMAN NADAF
NADAF Date:
2026.10.09
19:33:10
+0530 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 654 OF 2026
IN
APPL. FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPEAL (STATE) (ST) NO.3785 OF 2026
The State Of Maharashtra ....Applicant
V/s
Bhumsing Udaysing Kachavay ....Respondent
****
Ms. Manisha R. Tidke, APP for Applicant/State.
None for the Respondent.
****
CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.
DATE : 9th OCTOBER, 2026
P.C. :
1. Heard learned APP. This is an application by State for
condonation of delay of 47 days in filing leave application.
2. None appears for the Respondent despite of service. No reply is
filed.
3. Considering the averments in the application and extent of
delay, sufficient cause is made out.
4. Application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Interim application
is disposed of in above terms.
5. List ALS(ST)/3785/2026 on 20.11.2026.
(M.M. SATHAYE, J.)
Husen 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.