Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GANESH RAYSING RATHODversusTHE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND ANOTHER

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn, thereby refusing to grant bail.

Summary

Ganesh Raysing Rathod filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking protection against arrest in a case instituted by the Superintendent of Police. The applicant was represented by Advocate V. S. Wakale, while the State was represented by Advocate N. R. Dayama. After hearing both sides, the Court expressed a disinclination to grant any relief. On the Court's indication, the applicant instructed his counsel to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application as withdrawn, leaving the matter unresolved on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant under the Criminal Procedure Code
  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn by the applicant

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • High Court
  • bail jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38159
                                                                       21-ABA-1033-2026.odt



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                     ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1033 OF 2026

                                    Ganesh Raysing Rathod
                                            VERSUS
                            The Superintendent Of Police And Another
                                                ...
          Mr. V. S. Wakale, Advocate for Applicant
          Mr. N. R. Dayama, APP for the Respondents – State
                                                ...

                                                            CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J
                                                            DATE  : AUGUST 24, 2026

          P. C. :

          1.           After hearing learned Counsels for both sides and when this

          Court has shown its disinclination to grant any relief, learned Counsel for

          the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the Application.


          2.           In view of this, Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed as

          withdrawn.


                                                               (R. M. JOSHI, J.)
          Malani




                                             Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.