Bombay High Court
JAY RAVINDRA GHOLEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The anticipatory bail application was disposed of because there was no apprehension of arrest.
Summary
The applicant, Mr. Jay Ravindra Ghole, filed an anticipatory bail application claiming that a C‑Summary Report had already been filed and that there was no apprehension of arrest. Counsel for the applicant, Ms. Neha Rane, argued that the circumstances negated the need for anticipatory bail. The Court examined whether the filing of a C‑Summary Report removed the basis for granting anticipatory bail. Finding that the applicant was not likely to be arrested, the Court disposed of the anticipatory bail application. However, the Court granted the applicant liberty to file a fresh application if circumstances change.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when a C‑Summary Report has been filed and there is no apprehension of arrest
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- criminal procedure
- bail
- C‑Summary Report
- high court
Judgment
22-ABA-1238-2025.doc
Rohit Ghuge
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1238 OF 2025
Mr. Jay Ravindra Ghole …Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
_______________________________________________________________
Ms. Neha Rane h/f Prasad Panchal, for Applicant.
Ms. M. S. Tidke, APP for Respondent.
_______________________________________________________________
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED: 17 AUGUST 2026
P.C.:
1. Ms. Neha Rane, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant
states that a C-Summary Report has been and therefore, there is no
apprehension of arrest.
2. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of.
However, liberty is granted to the applicant to file a fresh application, if
required.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
1
Checking your session…