Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NITESH BABU MANJREKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant had already obtained regular bail.

Summary

The applicant, Nitesh Babu Manjrekar, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1246 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf. The State's counsel, B. B. Kulkarni, informed the Court that the applicant had been arrested during the pendency of the application and subsequently released on regular bail. Relying on this development, the Court held that the anticipatory bail application was rendered moot. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application should be entertained when the applicant has already been granted regular bail.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure
  • bail jurisdiction
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                                          10-ABA-1246-2025 (CR).doc


   Shubhada S Kadam


                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1246 OF 2025

                                             Nitesh Babu Manjrekar
                                                     Versus
                                            The State of Maharashtra
                      _________________________________________________________________

                      None for Applicant.
                      Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State.
                      _________________________________________________________________

                                                         CORAM        :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                         DATE         :   17th JULY, 2026.
                      P.C. :

                      1.         None present for the applicant.

                      2.         Learned APP, on instructions, submits that during the pendency

                      of this application, the applicant was arrested and he has been released on

                      regular bail.

                      3.         Considering the submission of learned APP, the application has

                      become infructuous and is dismissed.

                                                                    (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




         Digitally
         signed by
         SHUBHADA
SHUBHADA SHANKAR
SHANKAR KADAM
KADAM    Date:
         2026.07.18
         16:09:17
         +0530




                                                      Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.