Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MININATH DILIP CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Mininath Dilip Chavan, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1323 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and others. After hearing both sides, the applicant's counsel, on instructions, sought to withdraw the application. The Court, noting its earlier reluctance to grant relief, accepted the withdrawal. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. The Court also quantified fees of Rs.10,000 for the appointed counsel of Respondent No. 3.

Issues considered

  • What was the appropriate decision on the anticipatory bail application filed by the applicant?

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42085
                                                                       932-ABA-1323-2026.odt



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                     932 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1323 OF 2026

                                      Mininath Dilip Chavan
                                              Versus
                               The State Of Maharashtra And Others

          Mr. S. R. Andhale, Advocate for Applicant
          Mr. S. P. Joshi, APP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
          Ms. Smita Kasture, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 (appointed)

                                                           CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J
                                                           DATE  :SEPTEMBER 11, 2026

          P. C. :

          1.            After hearing learned Counsels for both sides and when this

          Court has shown its disinclination to grant any relief, learned Counsel for

          the Applicant, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the Application.


          2.            In view of this, Application is dismissed as withdrawn.


          3.            Fees of appointed Counsel for Respondent No. 3 is quantified @

          Rs.10,000/-.


                                                                (R. M. JOSHI, J.)
          Malani




                                             Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.