Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PAVAN NANDU YADAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Pavan Nandu Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1359 of 2026) before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking protection from arrest in a case instituted by the State of Maharashtra. Both parties were represented, with Ms. Ashwini Patil and Mr. Sudarshan J. Salunke appearing for the applicant and Ms. R. P. Gour for the State. After hearing the counsel, the applicant, through his lawyer, requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, noting its earlier reluctance to grant relief, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the anticipatory bail application should be entertained or granted

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38164
                                                                      925-ABA-1359-2026.odt



                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                        925 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1359 OF 2026

                                       Pavan Nandu Yadav
                                            VERSUS
                             The State Of Maharashtra And Another
                                                ...
          Ms. Ashwini Patil h/f., Sudarshan J. Salunke, Advocate for the Applicant.
          Ms. R. P. Gour, APP for the Respondent – State.
                                                ...

                                                             CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J
                                                             DATE  : AUGUST 21, 2026

          P. C. :

          1.        After hearing learned counsel for both sides and when this Court has

          shown disinclination to grant any relief to the applicant, learned counsel for

          the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application.

          2.        The application stands dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                                (R. M. JOSHI, J.)

          Kiran Kawre




                                              Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.