Bombay High Court
PAVAN NANDU YADAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- Withdrawn
Holding
The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Pavan Nandu Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1359 of 2026) before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking protection from arrest in a case instituted by the State of Maharashtra. Both parties were represented, with Ms. Ashwini Patil and Mr. Sudarshan J. Salunke appearing for the applicant and Ms. R. P. Gour for the State. After hearing the counsel, the applicant, through his lawyer, requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, noting its earlier reluctance to grant relief, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the anticipatory bail application should be entertained or granted
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal
- criminal procedure
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38164
925-ABA-1359-2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
925 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1359 OF 2026
Pavan Nandu Yadav
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
...
Ms. Ashwini Patil h/f., Sudarshan J. Salunke, Advocate for the Applicant.
Ms. R. P. Gour, APP for the Respondent – State.
...
CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE : AUGUST 21, 2026
P. C. :
1. After hearing learned counsel for both sides and when this Court has
shown disinclination to grant any relief to the applicant, learned counsel for
the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application.
2. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
Kiran Kawre
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…