Bombay High Court
ANIS SULTAN TANDELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The court held that, given the seriousness of the extortion and threat allegations and the prima facie evidence, anticipatory bail under Section 482 could not be granted.
Summary
The applicant, Anis Sultan Tandel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that a false FIR was lodged against him for alleged extortion and threats related to a land dispute involving a 231‑acre property. The prosecution alleged that Tandel demanded a total of Rs 20 crore to withdraw complaints, PILs and threats of violence, supported by a video recording of the conversation. The court examined the seriousness of the offences under Sections 308(2), 308(5) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and the presence of prima facie evidence, including the video, and held that custodial interrogation was essential. Citing the Supreme Court’s view in State Rep. by the CBI v. Anil Sharma, the court ruled that granting bail would impede effective investigation. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was rejected, with the trial court directed to decide the case on its merits.
Issues considered
- The appropriateness of granting anticipatory bail under Section 482 for alleged extortion and threat offences.
- Whether the existence of prima facie evidence and seriousness of the allegations justify denial of bail and necessitate custodial interrogation.
- Impact of prior acquittals or settlements on the grant of anticipatory bail.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 308(2), 308(5), 351(3)
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 438
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- extortion
- threat
- Section 482
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- custodial interrogation
- false FIR
- land dispute
- ransom
Judgment
913-ABA-1415-2026.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1415 OF 2026
Anis Sultan Tandel …Applicant
ARJUN Versus
VITTHAL The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents
KUDHEKAR
Digitally signed by
ARJUN VITTHAL
KUDHEKAR
Date: 2026.09.29 Mr. Dinesh Adsule a/w Chinmay Bhole, for the Applicant.
15:06:57 +0530
Mr. S. V. Walve, APP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Mubin Solkar a/w Tahir Hussain, Anas Shaikh, Tahera Qureshi,
Hemal Shah & Zahid Burud & Reyden Gonsalves i/b Eventa
Gonsalves, for Respondent No.2-First Informant.
API Sujit S. Gadade, Revdanda Police Station, District-Raigad,
present.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED: 23 SEPTEMBER 2026
PC:-
1. Heard Mr. Adsule, learned Counsel appearing for the
Applicant, Mr. Walve, learned APP, for the Respondent-State of
Maharashtra and Mr. Solkar, learned Counsel appearing for
Respondent No.2-First Informant.
2. By this Anticipatory Bail Application filed under Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , the Applicant is
seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with CR No.64 of 2026
registered with Revdanda Police Station, District - Raigad, for the
Page 1
Arjun
913-ABA-1415-2026.DOC
offences punishable under Sections 308(2), 308(5) and 351(3) of
the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (“BNS”).
3. Mr. Adsule, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant,
submits that a false FIR has been filed against the Applicant. He
submits that huge land of about 231 acres has been purchased by
one Taijun N. Hassonjee, who is the Chairman and Managing
Director of R. T. Tricon Design & Build Contractors Private Limited.
He submits that the said huge property is agricultural and forest
land and is Government land and, therefore, as the Applicant is
filing various complaints with the authorities, false FIR is lodged.
He submits that as the Applicant has filed various proceedings
including a Public Interest Litigation, a false FIR has been filed
against him. He submits that that even three criminal antecedents
which have been disclosed in the Anticipatory Bail Application are
also false complaints and, therefore, in one CR being CR No.126 of
2017 the Applicant has been acquitted, in CR No.109 of 2018 the
Applicant is not even an Accused and insofar as CR No.37 of 2019
is concerned, the District Court has granted stay. He, therefore,
submits that anticipatory bail be granted.
Page 2
Arjun
913-ABA-1415-2026.DOC
4. On the other hand, Mr. Walve, learned APP, for the
Respondent-State, submits that this is a very serious case where
false complaints/proceedings have been filed and thereafter for
withdrawal of the said complaints/proceedings, huge amount of
Rs.20 Crores was demanded. Out of which, Rs.18 Crores have been
demanded from said R. T. Tricon Design & Build Contractors
Private Limited and Rs.2 Crores have been demanded from the
Original Owners, who have sold the land to said Taijun N.
Hassonjee i.e. the Chairman and Managing Director of the said
Company. He submits that insofar as the said threats and demand
are concerned, material in form of a video is available. Learned
APP tenders the transcript of the said conversation and submits
that even the allegations have also been made against the Judges.
He, therefore, submits that custodial interrogation is absolutely
essential.
5. Mr. Solkar, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.2,
supports the said contention. He submits that the offence has been
registered under Sections 308(2) and 308(5) of BNS and reading
of FIR clearly shows that the offence is made out.
Page 3
Arjun
913-ABA-1415-2026.DOC
6. Before considering the rival contentions, it is necessary to set
out the statement of the First Informant on the basis of which the
FIR has been lodged. The said statement is as under:
ßvkeps vkj- Vh- Vªk;dWku fM>kbZu vWUM fcYM dWkUVW ªDVlZ izk- fy-] ;k
daiuhps eq[; dk;kZy; lk[kj Hkou] ufjeu ikWbaZV] eqc a bZ ;sFks vlwu
daiuhps v/;{k rStqu gluth gs vkgsr- vkeph daiuh Lor%P;k
ekyfdP;k egkjk”Vª jkT;kr vlysY;k fofo/k fBdk.kP;k izkWiVhZt fodlhr
dj.;kps dke djrs- eh daiuhP;k ekyfdP;k fofo/k fBdk.kh vlysY;k
izWkiVhZtP;k lqj{ksdjhrk useysY;k lqj{kkj{kd ;kaps dkekoj fu;a=.k o
ns[kjs[k dj.;kps dke djrks- rlsp daiuhps v/;{k rStuq gluth gs eyk
brj ts lkaxrhy rh dkes eh djhr vlrks- vkeps daiuhP;k ekyfdph
ekSts ekaMyk- rk- eq#M] ft- jk;xM ;sFks xV ua- 188/4] 188/6/1]
188/6/2 ¼tquk xV ua- 188@2@v½ v’kh tehu vlwu rsFks uksOgsacj
2021 iklwu daiuh tehu MsOgyihaxps dke djr vkgs- rsOgkiklwu lnj
fBdk.kh lqj{ksdjhrk useysY;k lqj{kkj{kd ;kaps dkekoj fu;a=.k o ns[kjs[k
dj.;kps dke eh djrks- rlsp daiuhps v/;{k rStqu gluth ;kauh eyk
lnj izWkiVhZP;k vuq”kaxkus r;kj gks.kkjs LFkkuhd iz’u gkrkG.ks] rlsp
LFkkuhd yksdkalkscrps fyxy fMLI;qV gkrkG.ks] rlsp lnj izkWiVhZP;k
vuq”kaxkus daiuhP;korhus daiuhpk izfrfu/kh Eg.kwu ppsZr Hkkx ?ks.ks o
R;kckcr daiuhps v/;{k fdaok brj ofj”Bkauk R;kph osGksoG s h ekfgrh ns.ks
bR;knh dkes eh djr vlrks-
ekSts ekaMyk ;sFks daiuhP;k ekydhP;k lnj tehu MsOgyihaxps dke pkyw
>kY;kuarj lq#okrhP;k dkGkiklwu ekaMyk ;sFkhy LFkkuhd jfgoklh vful
lqyrku rkaMsy ;kus vkeP;k daiuhP;k fojks/kkr oufoHkkx LFkkuhd
rykBh] eaMG vf/kdkjh] rglhynkj eq#M] izkr a vf/kdkjh vfyckx rlsp
ftYgkf/kdkjh vfyckx ;kaps dk;kZy;kr fofo/k dkj.ks nsowu rdzkjh vtZ
dsysys gksrs- rks eyk ek>s eksckbZy ojrh dkWy d#u fofo/k fBdk.kh
cksykowu ?ksowu R;kus dsysY;k lnj rdzkjh vtkZP;k dkWih eyk nk[kor
vls o R;k rdzkjh ekxs ?ks.;klkBh ek÷;kdMs iS’kakph ekx.kh djr vls-
lnjckcr eh vkeps daiuhps v/;{k rStqu gluth o brj ojh”Bkauk
osGksoG s h ekfgrh nsr gksrks- vful lqyrku rkaMy s ;kpsckcr eh LFkkuhd
yksdkadMwu ekfgrh ?ksryh vlrk vful rkaMsy gk vktqcktqP;k
ifjljkrhy yksdkaP;k tkxsP;k lanHkkZr fofo/k dk;kZy;kr rdzkjh d:u
R;kapsdMqu iSls ?ksrks v’kh ekfgrh feGkyh R;keqGs R;kus vkeps daiuh
fojks/kkr dsysY;k rdzkjh fojk/kkr vkEgh lacfa /kr dk;kZy;kr vkeps Eg.k.ks
lknj dsysys gksrs o R;kus ek÷;kdMs dsysY;k ekx.;kadMs vkEgh nqyZ{k
dsys gksrs] R;keqGs R;kus vkeps daiuhps v/;{k ;kaP;kfojks/kkr ls’ku dksVZ]
vfyckx ;sFks ojhy tehu fg oufoHkkxkph vlwu rh csdk;ns’khjfjR;k
[kjsnh dsysyh vkgs v’kk v’k;kph dsl dsysyh gksrh- lnj dslph
lquko.kh gksowu fudky daiuhps v/;{k ;kaP;k cktwus ykxysyk vkgs-
Page 4
Arjun
913-ABA-1415-2026.DOC
R;kuarj R;kus R;kp fo”k;kP;kckcr gk;dksVZ] eqacbZ ;sFks vkeps daiuhps
v/;{k rlsp ftYgkf/kdkjh] jk;xM rlsp brj ‘kklfd;
vf/kdkjh ;kapsfojks/kkr jhVfifV’ku nk[ky dsyh gksrh] R;koj gk;dksVkZr
lquko.kh >kyh vlrk rh jhVfifV’ku dksVkZus QsVkGwu ykoyh gksrh-
R;kuarj R;kp fo”k;kP;k vuq”kaxkus vful lqyrku rkaMy s ;kus gk;dksVZ]
eqacbZ ;sFks ih-vk;-,y~- nk[ky dsysyh vkgs vls eyk R;kus lk/kkj.k ,d
efgU;kiqohZ Lor% Qksu d#u cksyhZ] rk- eq#M ;sFks cksykowu ?ksowu le{k
lkaxhrys o lnjph gk;dksVZ] eqacbZ ;sFks nk[ky dsysY;k ih-vk;-,y~- ph
dkWih nk[koyh vkf.k R;kuarj rks eyk Eg.kkyk dh] ih-vk;-,y~
ekxs ?;k;ph vlsy rj eyk iSls |k ukghrj eh rqeP;k daiuhph okV
ykowu Vkdsu v’kh /kedh fnyh] rsOgk eh R;kyk lkaxhrys fd
IkS’kkP;kckcr eyk vkeP;k daiuhP;k v/;{kka’kh cksykos ykxsy R;kuarjp
eh rqyk dk; rs lkaxsu-
vkeps daiuhP;k ofjy uewn izkWiVhZ e/;s tk.;klkBh daiuhus cuoysY;k
jLR;ke/;s ckjekgh okgukjh unh vkMoh ;sr vlY;kus daiuhps yksd
rlsp loZ XkzkeLFkkauk ;s.;ktk.;klkBh lks; Ogkoh ;kdfjrk lnj unhojrh
czht cka/k.;klkBh vkEgh Xkzqi xzkeiapk;r] ekaMyk ;sFkwu ukgjdr
nk[kyk ?ks.;klkBh vtZ dsyk gksrk- lnj dkeklkBh ukgjdr nk[kyk
ns.;kr ;sow u;s ;klkBh vful rkaMy s ;kus lnj xzkeiapk;rhdMs rdzkjh
vtZ dsyk o lnj dkekr vMFkGk fuekZ.k dsyk- R;kuarj fMlsacj 2025
e/;s uDdh rkjh[k vkBor ukgh R;kus eyk dkWy d:u Lokxr gkWVsy]
cksyhZ ;sFks cksykowu ?ksrys R;koGh ek>slkscr vkeps daiuhr dke dj.kkjk
vdkaÅVaV yoys'k pkSohlk gk lq/nk gksrk rsOgk vful rkaMsy eyk
cksyyk fd] eh LFkkuhd vkgs eyk vMhp yk[k :i;s |k ukghrj eh
rqepk czht gksow ns.kkj ukgh- rjh i.k dke djk;yk xsykp rj eh rq>s
gkrik; rksMwu dqBs QsdwUk nsbZu gs rqyk dG.kkj i.k ukgh v'kh /kedh
fnyh- R;kosGh thokP;k Hkhrhus ?kkc:u xsyks o ekÖ;ktoG vlysys
iapohl gtkj :i;s R;kP;k gkrkr fnys o jkfgysys iSls eh daiuhP;k
v/;{kka'kh cksyY;k uarjp nsrks vls cksywu dlsrjh rsFkwu ek>h lqVdk
d:u ?ksryh-
R;kuarj R;kus fnukad 11-04-2026 jksth eyk Qksu d:u R;kps
ekaMyk ;sFkhy ?kjh R;kus nk[ky dsysY;k ih-vk;-,Yk- P;kckcr ppkZ
dj.;klkBh cksykowu ?ksrys R;keqGs R;k fno'kh nqikjh vankts ,d
okt.;kps lqekjkl eh rlsp vkeps daiuhr dke dj.kkjk vdkaÅVaV
yoys'k pkSohlk vls nks?ks vful rkaMy s ;kps ?kjh xsyks gksrks- R;kosGh
R;kps ?kjkrhy gkWy e/;s vful rkaMys ,dVkp clysyk gksrk- lq:okrhl
fdjdksG ppkZ >kY;kuarj rks vkEgkyk Eg.kkyk fd] vk/kh rqEgh eyk czht
ps iSls |k R;kosGh eh ?kkc:u ek>stoGps iapohl gtkj :i;s R;kP;k
gkrkr fnys o R;kyk Eg.kkyks fd] vkrkps iapohl vkf.k ;kiqohZ fnysys
iapohl vls IkUUkkl gtkj :i;s iksgkspys- rsOgk rks eyk Eg.kkyk fd
jkfgysys nksu yk[k :i;s ;s.kkÚ;k vkB fnolkr eyk |k-
R;kuarj vful rkaMy s eyk Eg.kkyk fd] rqeP;k fojks/kkr gk;dksVZ]
eqacbZ ;sFks ih-vk;-,Yk~- nk[ky dsysyh vlqu rh ekxs ?;k;yk eh r;kj
Page 5
Arjun
913-ABA-1415-2026.DOC
vkgs ijarw R;kcnY;kr eyk rqEgh eyk vBjk djksM :i;s |k vkf.k rqEgh
T;kaP;kdMwu rh tehu [kjsnh dsyh R;kapsdMwui.k nksu djksM :i;s rqEghp
R;kapsdMwu ?ksowu eyk |k] vls Eg.kkyk- R;kuarj vkEgh ?kkc:u R;kP;k
?kjkrwu fu?kwu xsyks-
vful rkaMy s ;kus ,dw.k ohl djksM nksu yk[k :i;kaph ekx.kh dsyh
vlysckcr eh daiuhps v/;{k rlsp brj ofj"B ;kauk Qksu}kjs dGoys-
R;kus dsysyh ohl djksM :i;kaph ekx.kh eksBh vlY;kus rlsp R;kus
daiuhph okV ykorks v'kh /kedh fnY;kus vkEgh loZt.k ?kkc:u xsyks
gksrks- lnjph ckreh fg vkeps daiuhr dke dj.kkjs Bsdsnkj]
dkexkj ;kauk ns[khy letY;kus rs lq/nk ?kkc:u vkeps daiuhps
lkbZVojrh dke djr vkgsr- vful rkaMy s ;kus vkepsdMs dsysY;k
[kaM.khP;k ekx.kheqGs Hkhrhps okrkoj.k r;kj >kysys vlwu R;keqGs
daiuhr dkekoj ;s.;klkBh dkexkj ?kkcjr vkgsr-
rjh uksOgsacj 2021 rs fnukad 11-04-2026 jksth ;k dkGkr vful
lqyrku rkaMsy ;kus eyk vMhp yk[k :i;s |k ukghrj eh rqepk czht
gksow ns.kkj ukgh] rjh i.k dke djk;yk xsykp rj eh rq>s gkrik; rksMwu
dqBs Qsdwu nsbZu gs rqyk dG.kkj i.k ukgh v'kh /kedh nsowu [kaM.khph
ekx.kh d:u R;kiSdh iUukl gtkj :i;s fLodkjys rlsp vkeps
daiuhP;k fojks/kkr gk;dksVZ] eqacbZ ;sFks R;kus nk[ky dsysyh ih-vk;-,y~-
ekxs ?ks.;kP;k cnY;kr ,dw.k ohl djksM :i;kaph [kaM.kh ekxhryh
vkf.k ih-vk;-,y~- ekxs ?;k;ph vlsy rj eyk iSls |k ukghrj eh
rqeP;k daiuhph okV ykowu Vkdsu v'kh /kedh fnyh Eg.kwu R;kps fo:/n
ek>h rdzkj vkgs-
vful rkaMys vkf.k ek>sr >kysys ojhy cksy.ks gs fganh Hkk"ksr >kysys
vlwu eh ;sFks ejkBh Hkk"ksr lkaxhrys vkgs- fn-11/04/2026 jksth
vful rkaMsy o vkeP;kr >kysY;k laHkk"k.kkph OghMhvks jsdkWMhZax
ekÖ;kdMs vlqu rh eh lknj dj.kkj vkgs- lnjph rdzkj eh vkeps
daiuhP;k ofj"Bka'kh ppkZ d:u vkt jksth iksyhl Bk.;kr rdzkj
ns.;klkBh vkyks vkgs-Þ
(Emphasis added)
English translation of the same is as under:
The Head Office of our R.T. Tricone Design & Build
Contractors Private Limited Company is located at
Sakhar Bhavan, Nariman Point, Mumbai and Taizun
Hassonjee serves as the President of this Company. Our
company works to develop properties owned by the
owners of the Company at various places in the State of
Maharashtra. I work to control and supervise the work of
Page 6
Arjun
913-ABA-1415-2026.DOC
security guards appointed for the security of the
properties owned by the owners of the Company at
various places. Similarly, I do other works as directed by
the President of the Company by name Taizun
Hassonjee. Our Company own a land bearing Gat Nos.
188/4, 188/6/1, 188/6/2 (Old Gat No. 188/2/A),
situated at village Mandala, Taluka Murud, District
Raigad and from the month of November, 2021, our
Company is carrying out the development of the said
land at the said place and since then, I work to control
and supervise the work of security guards appointed for
the security of the said place. Moreover, as directed by
the President of the Company by name Taizun
Hassonjee, I do other works such as, to deal with the
local issues arising in respect of the said property, to
handle the legal disputes arising with local public and
also, to participate in the discussions in connection with
the said property in the capacity of the representative of
the Company on behalf of the Company and to give
information regarding the same to the President or other
Superior Authority from time to time, etc.. to give
information of the same from time to time.
Since the time, the development work of the said land
has started in village Mandala, thereafter, from the
beginning, Anis Sultan Tandel, resident of Mandala, had
filed complaint applications against our Company in the
Offices of the Forest Department, Local Talathi, the Circle
Officer, the Tehsildar, Murud, the Sub Divisional Officer,
Alibag and the Collector, Alibag on various grounds. He
used to telephone me on my mobile, call me at various
places and show me copies of the said complaint
applications, which he had made and demand money
from me to withdraw those complaints. Therefore, I used
to inform the President of our Company by name Taizun
Hassonjee and other Superior Authority in this regard,
from time to time. When I enquired with the local
people about Anis Sultan Tandel, I learned that Anis
Sultan Tandel used to make complaints to various Offices
regarding the land of the people in the surrounding area
and extract money from them. Therefore, we had
Page 7
Arjun
913-ABA-1415-2026.DOC
submitted our say to the concerned Office against the
complaints which he had made against our Company
and we had ignored the demands he had made to me
and therefore, he had filed a case against the President
of our Company before the Hon’ble Sessions Court,
Alibag, alleging therein that the aforesaid land belonged
to the Forest Department and that the same had been
purchased illegally. The trial of the said case has
concluded and the decision was rendered in favor of the
President of the Company. Thereafter, he had filed a Writ
Petition on the same issue before the Hon’ble High Court,
Mumbai against the President of our Company as well as
the Collector, Raigad and other Government Officials and
when the Petition came up for hearing before the
Hon’ble High Court, the same was rejected by the
Hon’ble Court. Thereafter, about a month ago, Anis
Sultan Tandel himself telephoned and called me at Borli,
Taluka Murud and he personally told me that he had
filed a P.I.L. before the Hon’ble High Court, Mumbai in
connection with the same issue and showed me a copy of
the P.I.L. filed before the Hon’ble High Court, Mumbai
and thereafter he threatened me by saying : “If you want
to get the P.I.L. withdrawn, give me money, otherwise I
will ruin your Company”. Thereupon, I told him : “I
would have to talk to the President of our Company
regarding the demand of money and only thereafter, I
would inform you as to what has been decided”.
As a perennial river crosses the access road constructed
by our Company to reach the aforesaid property of our
Company, we (our Company) had applied for a No-
Objection Certificate from the Group Gram Panchayat,
Mandala, to build a bridge over the river in order to
facilitate the to and fro movement of Company staff as
well as all the villagers. Anis Tandel filed a complaint
application with the concerned Gram Panchayat to
prevent the No-Objection Certificate from being issued
for the said work and caused hindrance in the said work.
Thereafter, in the month of December, 2025, I do not
remember the exact date, he telephoned and called me
at Swagat Hotel, Borli. At that time, our Accountant
Page 8
Arjun
913-ABA-1415-2026.DOC
Lavlesh Chauvisa, who worked in our Company, was
accompanying me. At that time, Anis Tandel threatened
me by saying : “I am a local resident and give me Rs. two
and a half Lakhs, otherwise I will not let your bridge be
built. However, even then if you try to start the work, I
will cut off your limbs and throw them so far that you
will not even realize as to where the same are thrown”.
At that time, I got scared for my life and gave Rs. twenty-
five thousands in his hands, which I had with me and
said to him that I would give the remaining money only
after talking to the President of the Company and
somehow I got myself escaped from the said place.
Thereafter, on the date 11.04.2026, he telephoned and
called me at his house at Mandala to discuss regarding
the P.I.L. which he had filed and therefore, on the said
day, at about one o'clock in the afternoon, I along with
our Accountant Lavlesh Chauvisa, who works in our
Company, thus we both of us went to Anis Tandel's
house. At that time, Anis Tandel was sitting alone in the
hall of his house. After a small discussion at the
beginning, he said to us : “At first, you give me the
money for the bridge”. At that time, I got scared and
gave him Rs. twenty-five thousands in his hands, which I
had with me and told him, “Including the Rs. twenty-five
thousands paid now and the Rs. twenty-five thousands
which were paid earlier, thus you received total Rs. fifty
thousands”. Thereupon, he told me to give him the
remaining amount of Rs. two lakhs within the next eight
days.
Thereafter, Anis Tandel told me : “A P.I.L. has been filed
against you before the Hon’ble High Court, Mumbai and
I am ready to withdraw the same, but in lieu thereof, you
give me Rs. eighteen crores and you yourself take Rs.
two crores even from the people from whom you (the
Company) bought the said land and give the same to
me”. Thereafter, being scared, we left his house.
Thereafter, I informed the President of the Company
and other Superior Authority on phone call about Anis
Tandel's demand for a total amount of Rs. twenty crores,
Page 9
Arjun
913-ABA-1415-2026.DOC
two lakhs. As, his demand for Rs. twenty crores was of
huge amount and he had also threatened that he would
ruin the Company, we all got scared. The said news has
also reached the contractors and workers working in our
Company and they are also working in fear at our
Company's site. Ransom demand made by Anis Tandel to
us has created an atmosphere of fear and therefore, the
workers are afraid to come to work in the Company.
Thus, during the period from November, 2021 to the
date 11.04.2026, Anis Sultan Tandel, threatened me by
saying : “Give me Rs. two and a half Lakhs, otherwise I
will not let your bridge be built. However, if you try to
start the work, I will cut off your limbs and throw them
so far that you will not even realize as to where the same
are thrown” and demanded ransom and extracted Rs.
fifty thousands from me. Moreover, he demanded a total
ransom of Rs. twenty crores for withdrawing the P.I.L.
filed against our Company before the Hon’ble High
Court, Mumbai and further threatened by saying : “If you
want to get the P.I.L. withdrawn, give me the money,
otherwise I will ruin your Company” and therefore, I
have a complaint against him.
The aforesaid conversation between Anis Tandel and
me took place in Hindi and I have stated the same here
in Marathi. I have with me the video recording of the
conversation which took place between Anis Tandel and
me, on the date 11/04/2026 and I am going to produce
the same. I have discussed regarding the said complaint
with the Superior Authority of our Company and
thereafter, today, I came in the Police Station to lodge
this complaint.
(Emphasis added)
7. Thus, as per the prosecution case, the Applicant has filed
complaints with various authorities including with the Forest
Department, Talathi, Circle Officer, Tahsildar, Prant Officer as well
Page 10
Arjun
913-ABA-1415-2026.DOC
as Collector. The Applicant has also filed the proceedings in the
Sessions Court as well as various proceedings including a PIL in the
High Court. The allegation is that for withdrawal of all these
complain/proceedings and PIL, total amount demanded is Rs.20
Crores. The FIR records that he has demanded Rs.18 Crores from
the said Company or the purchaser and Rs.2 Crores from the
Original Owners, who have sold the land to Taijun N. Hassonjee
i.e. the Chairman and Managing Director of the said Company.
8. It is significant to note that in the FIR itself it is specifically
stated that the conversation between the First Informant and the
Applicant is recorded on video. The transcript of the same which is
produced before this Court, prima facie, supports the prosecution
case where there is a demand of Rs.20 Crores inter alia for
withdrawal of PIL. In fact, the allegations are also made against
the Judges. The offence is very serious. Threats are also given of
assault if the said payment is not made. Thus, this is a case where
custodial interrogation is absolutely essential.
9. The Supreme Court in the decision of State Rep. by the C.B.I.
v. Anil Sharma 1, has held that the custodial interrogation is
1 (1997) 7 SCC 187
Page 11
Arjun
913-ABA-1415-2026.DOC
qualitatively more elicitation-oriented than questioning a suspect
who is well ensconced with a favourable order under Section 438
of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 i.e. Section 482 of BNSS.
The effective interrogation of suspected person is of tremendous
advantage in disinterring many useful information and also
materials which would have been concealed. Success of such
interrogation would elude if the suspected person knows that he is
well protected and insulted by a pre-arrest bail during the time he
interrogated. The said observations of the Supreme Court are
squarely applicable to the present case. Thus, for effective
interrogation in this serious case, custodial interrogation is
necessary.
10. As stated above, the offence is very serious of extortion of
huge amount of Rs.20 Crores as well as the allegations have been
made against the Judges.
11. It is required to be noted that although it is the contention of
the Applicant that insofar as CR No.126 of 2017 is concerned,
where the allegations are of the same nature that complaints have
been filed with the Circle Officer and Talathi and for withdrawal of
the same Rs.50,000/- has been demanded from the First Informant
Page 12
Arjun
913-ABA-1415-2026.DOC
in said CR, Mr. Adsule, learned Counsel for the Applicant has very
heavily relied on the Judgment and Order dated 1st June 2023
passed by the learned JMFC, Murud in Regular Criminal Case
No.122 of 2018 concerning said crime. However, perusal of the
said Order dated 1st June 2023, shows that the First Informant in
that case i.e. PW-1 has been declared as hostile and during cross-
examination conducted by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor,
said PW-1 admitted that the dispute is settled between the
Applicant and him outside the Court. Thus, the said decision in fact
shows that the acquittal is not clear acquittal and, therefore, not
relevant.
12. In any case, the offence is very serious. There is strong prima
facie material against the Applicant. Accordingly, no case is made
out for grant of anticipatory bail. The Anticipatory Bail Application
is rejected.
13. It is clarified that the Trial Court shall decide the case on its
merits, uninfluenced by the prima facie observations made in this
Order.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Page 13
Arjun
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.