Bombay High Court
SANKET SUNIL NIMSEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Holding
The Court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and disposed of it.
Summary
Sanket Sunil Nimse filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Chaitanya C. Mulawkar, later sought leave to withdraw the application. The State of Maharashtra, represented by Mr. Balraj B. Kulkarni, opposed the withdrawal. The Court considered the counsel's submission and examined whether a withdrawal could be permitted. It held that the applicant was entitled to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. Accordingly, the application was allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether an anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn at the applicant's request
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal
- criminal procedure
- high court
Judgment
3-ABA-1589-2026 (CR).doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1589 OF 2026
Sanket Sunil Nimse
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
_________________________________________________________________
Mr. Chaitanya C. Mulawkar, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. Balraj B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State.
PSI-R.R.Titame, Junnar Police Station, Pune Rural, present.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 17th JULY, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for
respondent-State.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave
to withdraw the application.
3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant,
the application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Digitally
signed by
SHUBHADA
SHUBHADA SHANKAR
SHANKAR KADAM
KADAM Date:
2026.07.18
16:09:16
+0530
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…