Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VINOD MARUTI GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Vinod Maruti Gaikwad filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The applicant was represented by Mr. N. B. Narwade, assisted by Mr. R. V. Gore. After hearing both sides, the Court expressed reluctance to grant any relief. Consequently, the applicant, on his counsel's instructions, sought to withdraw the application. The Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn and ordered that the legal aid fee for the appointed counsel of Respondent No. 2 be paid by the High Court Legal Aid Services Sub‑Committee.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • high court
  • legal aid

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41393
                                                                      927-ABA-1594-2026.odt



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                     927 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1594 OF 2026

                                      Vinod Maruti Gaikwad
                                            VERSUS
                              The State Of Maharashtra And Another

          Mr. N. B. Narwade h/f Mr. R. V. Gore, Advocate for Applicant
          Mr. S. P. Joshi, APP for Respondent No. 1
          Adv. V. M. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 (appointed)

                                                           CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J
                                                           DATE  :SEPTEMBER 08, 2026

          P. C. :

          1.            After hearing learned Counsels for both sides and when this

          Court has shown its disinclination to grant any relief, learned Counsel for

          the Applicant, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the Application.


          2.            In view of this, Application stands dismissed as withdrawn.


          3.            Fees of appointed Counsel for Respondent No. 2 is quantified @

          Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) to be paid by High Court Legal

          Aid Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad.


                                                               (R. M. JOSHI, J.)
          Malani




                                             Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.