Bombay High Court
KIRAN ARJUN VALAVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- Withdrawn
Holding
The anticipatory bail applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Two anticipatory bail applications (Nos. 1601 and 1625 of 2026) were filed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, by Kiran Arjun Valavi and Dnyaneshwari Harishchandra Ghuge respectively, seeking protection from arrest. Both the applicants' counsel appeared and indicated that the Court was not inclined to grant bail. On the instructions of their clients, the counsel sought to withdraw the applications. The Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the applications as withdrawn. No substantive consideration of the merits of the bail pleas was made.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicants
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal of application
- High Court
- criminal procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:44227
925 & 927.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
925 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1601 OF 2026
Kiran Arjun Valavi
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
Mr. A. R. Borulkar, Advocate for Applicant
Mrs. P. J. Bharad, APP for Respondents/State
927 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1625 OF 2026
Dnyaneshwari Harishchandra Ghuge
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra
Mr. N. V. Gaware Patil, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for Respondents/State
CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE :SEPTEMBER 29, 2026
P. C. :
1. After hearing learned Counsels for both sides and when this
Court has shown its disinclination to grant any relief, learned Counsels for
Applicants, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of both Applications.
2. In view of this, Applications stand dismissed as withdrawn.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
Malani
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…