Bombay High Court
DNYANESHWARI HARISHCHANDRA GHUGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- Withdrawn
Holding
Both anticipatory bail applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two anticipatory bail applications filed by Kiran Arjun Valavi and Dnyaneshwari Harishchandra Ghuge against the State of Maharashtra. After arguments, the applicants, on their counsel's instructions, sought to withdraw both applications. The Court, noting its disinclination to grant relief, accepted the withdrawal. Consequently, both anticipatory bail applications were dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits on bail were adjudicated.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicants
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal
- dismissal
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:44228
925 & 927.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
925 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1601 OF 2026
Kiran Arjun Valavi
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
Mr. A. R. Borulkar, Advocate for Applicant
Mrs. P. J. Bharad, APP for Respondents/State
927 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1625 OF 2026
Dnyaneshwari Harishchandra Ghuge
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra
Mr. N. V. Gaware Patil, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for Respondents/State
CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE :SEPTEMBER 29, 2026
P. C. :
1. After hearing learned Counsels for both sides and when this
Court has shown its disinclination to grant any relief, learned Counsels for
Applicants, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of both Applications.
2. In view of this, Applications stand dismissed as withdrawn.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
Malani
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…