Bombay High Court

SHASHIKANT BHAURAO HINGONEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided: 22 June 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off
Bench: SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail applications and granted liberty to file fresh applications before the Sessions Court.

Summary

Three applicants filed anticipatory bail applications before the Bombay High Court arising from the same FIR. The counsel sought permission to withdraw these applications and re‑file fresh applications before the Sessions Court. The Court, after considering the submissions, allowed the withdrawal, granted liberty to file new applications before the Sessions Court, ordered that no coercive steps be taken against the applicants for two weeks, and disposed of all pending applications.

Issues considered

Whether an anticipatory bail application pending before the High Court can be withdrawn and re‑filed before the Sessions Court
Whether the High Court can grant liberty to re‑file and stay coercive actions pending withdrawal

Subjects

anticipatory bail
withdrawal
jurisdiction
criminal procedure
sessions court
coercive steps

Judgment

                                                    501-ABA-1646-26 WITH 502 and 503.docx



N.S.Kamble


         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

     CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1646 OF 2026

Pravin Vasant Ahire                                          ...Applicant
VERSUS
State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                                  ...Respondents

                                   WITH
     CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 12210 OF 2026

Shashikant Bhaurao Hingonekar                                ...Applicant
VERSUS
State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                                  ...Respondents

                                   WITH
     CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 12200 OF 2026

Devidas Pandit Mahajan                      ...Applicant
VERSUS
State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                 ...Respondents
____________________________________________________________
Mr.Sujeet Karlekar i/b Mr.Akshay Karlekar, for the Applicant in all matters.
Ms.M.M. Deshmukh, APP for Respondent-State.
____________________________________________________________
                                 CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                 DATE           : 22nd JUNE 2026

P.C. :

.            Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP.

2.           The learned counsel for the Applicant submit that, these above

Applications are preferred directly before this Court, arising out of the same

FIR in Anticipatory Bail Application No.1624 of 2026, hence, these


                                  Page 1 of 2
                                                    501-ABA-1646-26 WITH 502 and 503.docx



N.S.Kamble


Applications be taken on board and Applicants be permitted to withdraw

these Applications with liberty to file fresh Applications before Sessions

Court.

3.           Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the

Applicant, the Applications are taken on board and allowed to be withdrawn

with the aforesaid liberty.

4.           No coercive steps be taken against the Applicant for two weeks.

5.           All pending Applications are disposed of.



                                                 (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                   Page 2 of 2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…