Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

YATISH DILIP DESALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court allowed the anticipatory bail application, directing that no coercive steps be taken against the applicant pending the decision of the pending application.

Summary

Yatish Dilip Desale filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court, asserting that a similar application was already pending before the Sessions Court. The applicant's counsel requested that no coercive measures be taken against him until the pending application was decided. The State opposed the request. The Court considered the pendency of the earlier application and the principle that anticipatory bail may be granted to protect the applicant from arrest. Accordingly, the Court allowed the anticipatory bail application and ordered that no coercive steps be taken against the applicant pending the decision of the pending application.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when a similar application is pending before the Sessions Court
  • Whether coercive steps can be taken against the applicant pending the decision of the pending application

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal procedure
  • bail
  • pending proceedings
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                                       913-ABA-1693-2026 (CR).doc


                            S.S.Kilaje


                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1693 OF 2026

                                  Yatish Dilip Desale                                       … Applicant
                                  VERSUS
                                  The State Of Maharashtra                                  … Respondent

                                  _________________________________________________________________
         Digitally signed
         by SONALI
SONALI   SATISH
         KILAJE
SATISH
KILAJE
         Date:
         2026.06.29
         12:04:06
         +0700
                                  Mr. Satyajeet P. Dighe a/w. Mr. Shrirang Katneshwarkar and Mr. Sandeep
                                  Gupta, Advocate for Applicant.
                                  Ms. G.P.Mulekar, APP for Respondent-State.
                                  API – K.D.Korade, Nashik Road Police Station, present.
                                  _________________________________________________________________

                                                                       CORAM       :    SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                       DATE        :    25th JUNE, 2026.
                                  P.C. :

                                  1.         Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the

                                  State.

                                  2.         Learned counsel for the applicant submits that Anticipatory Bail

                                  Application of the applicant is pending before the Sessions Court.

                                  3.         Considering this fact, no coercive steps be taken against the

                                  applicant till decision of the pending Anticipatory Bail Application.

                                  4.         Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed and disposed of.



                                                                                 (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                                   Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.