Bombay High Court
RAJANI RAJENDRA SHAH AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous because regular bail had already been granted.
Summary
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing, counsel informed the Court that the applicants had already been granted regular bail by the Sessions Court. The Court noted that the grant of regular bail rendered the anticipatory bail application unnecessary. Consequently, the Court held that the anticipatory bail application had become infructuous. The application was therefore dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether an anticipatory bail application should be entertained when regular bail has already been granted
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- regular bail
- infructuous
- bail
- criminal procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41185
P-3.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1706 OF 2025
RAJANI RAJENDRA SHAH AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Mr. Y. G. Kasod, Advocate h/f Mr. P. P. Giri, Advocate for Applicants
Mrs. R. P. Gour, APP for Respondent/State
CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE :SEPTEMBER 07, 2026
P. C. :
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.
2. Learned Counsel for the Applicants, on instructions, makes
statement that Applicants are granted regular bail by the Sessions Court. As
such, Application has become infructuous.
3. In view of this, Application stands dismissed as infructuous.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
Malani
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…