Bombay High Court
AVINASH BALVANT PATILversusTHE POLICE INSPECTOR/INVESTIGATION OFFICER
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Holding
The trial court must decide the pending anticipatory bail application within two weeks.
Summary
Avinash Balvant Patil filed an anticipatory bail application which has been pending before the trial court for two months without any order. The applicant's counsel argued that the delay was unjustified. The High Court noted the pendency and directed the trial court to decide the application as early as possible, preferably within two weeks. No substantive discussion on legal principles was required. The anticipatory bail application was therefore disposed of after the direction.
Issues considered
- Whether the trial court should be directed to decide a pending anticipatory bail application within a specific time frame
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- criminal procedure
- trial court delay
- high court direction
Judgment
915-ABA-1737-2026 (CR).doc
Rohit Ghuge
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1737 OF 2026
Avinash Balvant Patil
VERSUS
The Police Inspector OF investigation Officer
_________________________________________________________________
Mr. Harish Garde, Advocate for Applicant.
Ms. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for Respondent-State.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 02nd JULY, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP for
Respondent-State.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that his Anticipatory
Bail Application is pending before the Trial Court for the last two months,
but no order is passed.
3. Considering his submission, the Trial Court is directed to decide
the pending Anticipatory Bail Application as early as possible, preferably
within two weeks.
4. Accordingly, this application is disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…