Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAIKH ATHAR SHAIKH AKHTARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The applications were dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, was hearing two anticipatory bail applications, No. 1742 of 2026 filed by Shaikh Athar Shaikh Akhtar and No. 1743 of 2026 filed by Saleem Murtuza Shaikh, both against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants sought anticipatory bail pending investigation. After hearing counsel for both sides, the learned counsel for the applicants expressed a wish to withdraw the applications. The Court, having earlier shown disinclination to grant any relief, considered the withdrawal. Accordingly, the applications were dismissed as withdrawn.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • dismissal
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41819
                                                                    901-ABA-1742-2026.odt



                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                        901 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1742 OF 2026

                                    Shaikh Athar Shaikh Akhtar
                                             VERSUS
                                     The State Of Maharashtra
                                               AND
                         ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1743 OF 2026

                                      Saleem Murtuza Shaikh
                                             VERSUS
                                     The State Of Maharashtra
                                                …..
          Patil Dhananjay Shrikant, Ganesh B. Gaikwad, Advocate for Applicant
          Mr. P. J. Bharad, APP for Respondent – State.
                                                …..

                                                           CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J
                                                           DATE  : SEPTEMBER 9, 2026

          P. C. :

          1.        After hearing learned counsel for both sides, when this Court had

          shown disinclination to grant any relief, learned counsel for the applicant

          seeks withdrawal of these applications. The application are dismissed as

          withdrawn.


                                                              (R. M. JOSHI, J.)




                                             Page 1 of 1
          Kiran Kawre


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.