Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BANDYA @ RAMESH SATISH SAGARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and disposed of it.

Summary

The applicant, Bandya @ Ramesh Satish Sagar, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Bombay. The Court, after hearing, expressed that it was not inclined to grant anticipatory bail and noted that two earlier anticipatory bail applications had already been withdrawn. Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Tanmay Kate, requested that the present anticipatory bail application also be withdrawn. The Court entertained this request and permitted the withdrawal of the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was disposed of without any order granting bail. The judgment was delivered by Justice Madhav J. Jamdar on 5 October 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when the Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail and the applicant seeks to withdraw the application?

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • bail
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                                      29-ABA-1793-2026.DOC




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1793 OF 2026


                    Bandya @ Ramesh Satish Sagar                         …Applicant
                          Versus
                    The State of Maharashtra                             …Respondent


                    Mr. Tanmay Kate i/b. Mr. V. V. Dushing, for the Applicant.
                    Mrs. M R. Tidke, APP, for the Respondent-State.
                    Mr. A. M. Mujawar, PSI, attached to Kalewadi Police Station,
                    Pimpri-Chinchwad, Pune, present.


                                           CORAM:      MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
                                           DATED :     5th OCTOBER 2026
                    PC:-


                    1.       After arguing the matter for some time and as the Court is

                    not inclined to grant anticipatory bail and two earlier Anticipatory

                    Bail Applications have also been withdrawn, Mr. Kate, learned

                    Counsel appearing for the Applicant seeks withdrawal of the

                    present Anticipatory Bail Application.



                    2.       Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to

                    be withdrawn and disposed of as such.



       Digitally
                                                               [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
       signed by
       SONALI
SONALI MILIND
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date:
       2026.10.05
       16:09:58
       +0530
                                                     Page 1
                    Sonali


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.