Bombay High Court
IBTESAMUL HAQUE IBRAHIM SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The anticipatory bail application was disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application, claiming that the dispute with the complainant had been settled and that a C-summary had already been filed before the Magistrate's Court. The respondent State confirmed the filing of the C-summary and acknowledged the settlement, indicating no risk of arrest. The applicant’s counsel then sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, noting the settlement and the existence of the C-summary, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the application was disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether an anticipatory bail application should be entertained when the dispute between complainant and accused is settled and a C-summary has been filed.
- Whether the applicant may withdraw the anticipatory bail application at the stage of hearing.
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- criminal procedure
- settlement of dispute
- C-summary
- withdrawal of application
Judgment
915-ABA-1979-2026.odt
Harish
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1979 OF 2026
Ibtesamul Haque Ibrahim Shaikh ...Applicants
V/S.
State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ...Respondents
_____________________________________________________________
Adv. Tohid Shaikh i/b Rafiq Gori, for the Applicant.
Adv. Ashok S. Gawai, APP for the Respondent – State.
Adv. Prashant M., for the Respondent No.2.
PSI – Mr. Sunil Khaire, Bangur Nagar Police Station, Mumbai is present.
________________________________________________________
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
DATE : 03RD SEPTEMBER, 2026.
P.C. :-
1. The Learned counsel for the applicant states that the dispute
is settled in between the complainant and the applicant. He also states
that although some investigation was conducted, the investigating
1/2
915-ABA-1979-2026.odt
officer has filed C-summary before the Magistrates Court.
2. Learned APP for the respondent also confirms the position that
C-summary is already filed. Thus, in view of the fact that the dispute is
already settled in between the complainant and the accused and since C-
summary is already filed, there is no apprehension of arrest.
3. Considering all the above aspects, particularly the fact that the
C-summary is filed, learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to
withdraw the application.
4. Accordingly, application is disposed of as withdrawn.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)
2/2
Checking your session…