Bombay High Court
RAHUL BABAN PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Holding
Leave to withdraw the anticipatory bail application was granted, and the application was dismissed.
Summary
Vaishali Anil Tikam filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant sought leave to withdraw the application, stating that the client had not informed him of the desire to withdraw. The court considered the counsel's submission and, exercising its discretion, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was allowed to be withdrawn. The court dismissed and disposed of the application.
Issues considered
- Whether leave may be granted to withdraw an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal of application
- CrPC
- criminal procedure
Judgment
44-ABA-1987-2026 (CR).doc
Tikam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1987 OF 2026
VAISHALI Rahul Baban Patil
ANIL
TIKAM Versus
The State of Maharashtra
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI
ANIL TIKAM
Date:
_________________________________________________________________
2026.08.04
12:02:01 +0530
Mr. Tapan Thatte i/by Mr. Harish Garde, Advocate for Applicant.
Mrs. R.D. Humane, APP for State.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 31st JULY, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant.
2. Learned counsel, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the
application as the client did not inform him about the withdrawal of the
application.
3. Considering his submissions, leave granted.
4. Application is allowed to be withdrawn. Application is
dismissed and disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…