Bombay High Court
SUNANDA UMESH CHANDANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as it was withdrawn by the applicant.
Summary
Mrs. Sunanda Umesh Chandane filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court seeking protection from arrest in a criminal case. The State of Maharashtra and the complainant opposed the relief. After hearing arguments, the Court indicated it was not inclined to grant bail. The applicant’s counsel then requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal of application
- criminal procedure
- High Court
Judgment
901-ABA-2072-2026.ODT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2072 OF 2026
Mrs. Sunanda Umesh Chandane …Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Anr. …Respondents
Adv. Kishor H. Hase, for the Applicant.
Mr. Arfan Sait, A.P. P., for the Respondent – State.
Adv. R. V. Gupta and Adv. Rohit Vaishya and Adv. Sadhna Yadav,
for the Complainant/Respondent No.2.
PSI Ajit Shinde (I. O.), Chembur Police Station, Mumbai and WPSI
Rupali Sanap , Pairavi Officer, are present.
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
DATE : 27TH AUGUST 2026
P.C:-
1. The matter was argued at length by learned counsel for
applicant as well as learned APP for respondent – State and
learned counsel for complainant.
2. After arguing the matter for some time, when this Court
was not inclined to grant any relief, learned counsel for
applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application.
3. Application is permitted to be withdrawn.
4. Hence, the instant Anticipatory Bail Application is
dismissed as withdrawn.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)
VDMokal/-
Page 1 of 1
th
27 August 2026
Checking your session…