Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRIYANKA S. C/O L SATHYANARAYAN AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The anticipatory bail application is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application after full disclosure of criminal antecedents.

Summary

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application and later sought to withdraw it, requesting liberty to file a fresh application after fully disclosing their criminal antecedents, in line with the Supreme Court’s decision in Zeba Khan v. State of U.P. (2026). The learned counsel argued that withdrawal was permissible provided the applicants complied with the disclosure requirement. The Court examined whether such withdrawal with liberty to re‑apply was within its jurisdiction. Relying on the Supreme Court precedent, the Court held that the withdrawal could be allowed with the condition of full disclosure. Consequently, the application was permitted to be withdrawn and the applicants were granted liberty to file a fresh application after complying with the disclosure requirement.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application after disclosing criminal antecedents.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal antecedents
  • Supreme Court precedent
  • bail jurisprudence

Judgment

                     KVM
                                                       1/1
                                                                         503 - ABA 2111 OF 2026.doc



        Digitally
        signed by
                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
        KANCHAN
KANCHAN VINOD
VINOD   MAYEKAR
MAYEKAR Date:
        2026.10.06
        19:44:46
        +0530
                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2111/2026

                     PRIYANKA S.,
                     C/O. L. SATHYANARAYAN & ANR.                      ….. APPLICANTS

                           VS

                     THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA                          …. RESPONDENT

                     Adv. Sandeep Mishra a/w. Adv. Madhura Mulay for the Applicants.

                     Mr. Bapu Holambe Patil, APP for the Respondent – State.

                                               CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
                                               DATE : 6TH OCTOBER, 2026


                     P.C. :-

                     1)           Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to

                     withdraw the instant application with liberty to file fresh application

                     after disclosing all the criminal antecedents in accordance with the

                     judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Zeba Khan vs.

                     State of U.P., 2026 SCC OnLine SC 188.

                     2)           Accordingly the application is permitted to be withdrawn

                     with liberty as prayed for.



                                                             [PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.]


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.