Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MARI @ MARUTI BALU CHAVANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Rejected

Holding

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted where the offence under the NDPS Act is serious and the applicant’s antecedents do not justify such relief.

Summary

The applicant, Mari @ Maruti Balu Chavan, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a case registered for offences under Sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant supplied a kilogram‑890 grams of Ganja to a co‑accused who was caught after a police raid at a tea house in Pune. The co‑accused’s statements and seized packing material linked the applicant to the contraband. The court noted that the offence is serious under the NDPS Act and that the applicant has two prior unrelated convictions, but found no special circumstances to merit bail. Consequently, the court rejected the anticipatory bail application. The decision was pronounced by Justice Madhav J. Jamdar on 21 September 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the applicability of Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 for granting anticipatory bail in NDPS cases?
  • Whether the seriousness of the NDPS offence and the applicant's prior antecedents preclude the grant of anticipatory bail?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • NDPS Act
  • narcotics
  • pre‑arrest bail
  • serious offence
  • prior convictions

Judgment

                                                  37-ABA-2112-2026.DOC




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
         ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2112 OF 2026


Mari @ Maruti Balu Chavan                            …Applicant
      Versus
The State of Maharashtra                             …Respondent


Mr. Adwait Bhonde i/b. Mr. Shrinath Mate, for the Applicant.
Mrs. Savita M. Yadav, APP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Swapnil Hans, PSI, attached to Warje Malwadi Police Station,
Pune City, Pune, present.


                       CORAM:      MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
                       DATED :     21st SEPTEMBER 2026
PC:-


1.       Heard Mr. Bhonde, learned Counsel appearing for the

Applicant and Mrs. Yadav, learned APP appearing for the

Respondent-State.



2.       This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”) seeking pre-arrest bail

in connection with C.R. No.161 of 2026 registered with Warje-

Malwadi Police Station, Pune, for the offences punishable under

Sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances Act, 1985 (“NDPS Act”).




                                 Page 1
Sonali
                                                   37-ABA-2112-2026.DOC




3.       As per the prosecution case, the police received a secret

information that a woman was secretly selling Ganja from Om

Namah Shivay Tea House situated at Warje Malwadi, Pune and

police kept watch and apprehended the co-accused-Kusum

Chandrakant Wanjale on 12th May 2026. During search of the bag

in the possession of the said co-accused, 31 transparent plastic

pouches containing Ganja of 1 kilogram 890 grams was seized.

While in custody, said co-accused gave memorandum and pointed

out the place from where she had procured the said Ganja. During

investigation, it transpired that said co-accused purchased the said

Ganja from the present Applicant. The panchnama records that at

the place from where the co-accused purchased Ganja from the

present Applicant, packing material was found.



4.       Thus, prima facie, the Applicant’s involvement is seen in the

crime. The offence is serious under the NDPS Act concerning

contraband Ganja.



5.       There are two antecedents against the Applicant of offences

which are not similar to the present offence. In the facts and

circumstances, no case is made out to grant the anticipatory bail.




                                 Page 2
Sonali
                                                               37-ABA-2112-2026.DOC




           6.       Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is rejected.




                                                        [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]



       Digitally
       signed by
       SONALI
SONALI MILIND
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date:
       2026.09.23
       10:49:38
       +0530




                                             Page 3
           Sonali


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.