Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SATHYA B JAVARASHETTI ALIAS SATISH SHETTYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and granted liberty to file a fresh application before the Sessions Court.

Summary

The applicant, Sathya B. Javarashetti alias Satish Shetty, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. After bail was granted to other co-accused, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the pending application and file a fresh one before the Sessions Court, invoking the principle of parity. The learned counsel argued that the circumstances had changed, making the original application redundant. The Court examined whether procedural rules permit such withdrawal and subsequent re‑filing in a lower court. Finding no legal impediment, the Court allowed the withdrawal and granted liberty to file a fresh application before the Sessions Court. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was withdrawn with liberty to approach the Sessions Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant may withdraw an anticipatory bail application pending before the High Court
  • Whether the applicant can file a fresh anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Court after withdrawal

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • parity
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                                               923-ABA-2130-2026.odt

                       Priyanka


                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                   ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2130 OF 2026
                       Sathya B. Javarashetti alias
                       Satish Shetty                                               ...Applicant
                                  V/S.
                       State Of Maharashtra                                        ...Respondent
                                                 _______________________________
                       Mr. Prabhanjay R. Dave a/w Mr. Tanmay R. Tendulkar & Mr. Shankar
          Digitally
                       K. Ambhure for the Applicant.
          signed by
          PRIYANKA
PRIYANKA  MADHAVRAO
MADHAVRAO KALE
KALE      Date:
                       Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent – State.
          2026.09.02
          10:22:21
          +0530
                       Mr. Deepak Hol, PSI, Pairavi Officer, Dr. D. B. Marg Police Station,
                       Present.
                                                 _______________________________
                                                    CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
                                                    DATE : 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2026.

                       P.C. :-



                       1.            Heard Mr. Dave, learned counsel for the applicant.

                       2.            In view of the grant of bail to other accused persons, learned

                       counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw instant application,

                       with liberty to file a fresh application before the Sessions Court on the

                       ground of parity.

                       3.            Accordingly, the applicant is permitted to withdraw the


                                                             1/2
                                                   923-ABA-2130-2026.odt

present application with liberty to file appropriate application before

the Sessions Court.



                                  (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)




                                 2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.