Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GULAM MAHAMMAD ABDUL RAHEMAN TELI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The anticipatory bail applications are disposed of as there is nothing remaining to consider.

Summary

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 22 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The counsel for the applicants informed the court that a summary of the case had been filed and accepted by the trial court. Although a protest petition filed by the informant remains pending, the counsel asserted that no substantive issue remains in the anticipatory bail application. The court examined the submissions and found that, with the summary already filed and accepted, there is nothing left to consider in the bail application. Consequently, the court disposed of the anticipatory bail applications.

Issues considered

  • Whether the anticipatory bail application should be entertained when the summary of the case has already been filed and accepted by the trial court

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • summary filing
  • criminal procedure
  • application disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:24225
                                                                         38-ABA-22-2025.odt



                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                      ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2025

                      Gulam Mahammad Abdul Raheman Teli And Another
                                            VERSUS
                                    The State Of Maharashtra
                                                ...
          Mr. A. K. Bhosle, Advocate for Applicants
          Ms. P. J. Bharad, APP for Respondents

                                          WITH
                          CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1397 OF 2025
                                     IN ABA/22/2025

                             Bilal Khwaja Hasan Abdul Gani Teli
                                           VERSUS
                      Gulam Mahammad Abdul Raheman Teli And Another
                                              …
          Mr. C. C. Deshpande, Advocate for Applicant
                                              ...

                                                           CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J
                                                           DATE  : JUNE 22, 2026

          PC :

          1.          Learned Counsel for the Applicants, on instructions, makes

          statement that 'B' summary has been filed and the same has been accepted

          by Trial Court. Though protest petition filed by the informant is pending,

          according to him, nothing survives in this Application.


          2.          In view of this, applications stand disposed of.


                                                               (R. M. JOSHI, J.)
          Malani




                                            Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.