Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

CHETAN DATTATRAY KHANDEKAR AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Chetan Dattatray Khandekar and Pravin Dattatray Khandekar applied for anticipatory bail before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench. The Court, after hearing arguments, was not inclined to grant the bail. The applicants, through their counsel, sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicants under the Criminal Procedure Code.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal procedure
  • withdrawal of application
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                1
                                                                                   54-ABA-2203-2025 (CR).DOC


                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                               CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                             CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2203 OF 2025

                             1. Chetan Dattatray Khandekar
                             2. Pravin Dattatray Khandekar                  ...Applicants

                                     VERSUS

           Digitally
           signed by
                             The State of Maharashtra                       ...Respondent
           SAJAKALI
SAJAKALI   LIYAKAT
LIYAKAT    JAMADAR
JAMADAR    Date:
           2026.01.28
           19:36:39
           +0530
                             Mr. Sachinkumar Rajepandhare, Advocate for Applicants.
                             Mr. Anand Subhash Shalgaonkar, APP for the Respondent-State.


                                                     CORAM       :    NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.
                                                     DATE        :    28th JANUARY 2026
                             P.C.

                             1.         After arguing at length on merit, when this Court was not

                             inclined to grant anticipatory bail, learned Advocate for applicants, on

                             instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application.

                             2.         Permission is granted. Application is dismissed and disposed

                             of as withdrawn.


                                                                      (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




                  Sajakali Jamadar


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.