Bombay High Court
SAJAN VIJAY SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
An anticipatory bail application becomes infructuous upon the death of the applicant and must be dismissed.
Summary
The applicant, Sajan Vijay Shinde, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 2297 of 2025) along with a criminal application (No. 339 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel informed the court that the applicant had died. The court held that the death of the applicant rendered the application infructuous, as no relief could be granted posthumously. Consequently, the court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as infructuous. The pending application, if any, was also disposed of.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of the applicant's death on a pending anticipatory bail application?
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- death of applicant
- infructuous application
- criminal procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39959
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1020 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2297 OF 2025
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 339 OF 2026
SAJAN VIJAY SHINDE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
...
Mr. Nilesh N. Bhagwat, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. S. P. Joshi, APP for the Respondent/State
Mr. S. S. Rathi, Advocate for the informant
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 2nd SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Mentioned out turn.
2. Learned Advocate for the applicant, on instructions, submits that the
applicant has expired. In view thereof, nothing survives for consideration in
the present application.
3. In view of the above, the application stands dismissed as having become
infructuous. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
( R. M. JOSHI, J.)
ssp
1020 ABA 2297.2025.odt 1 of 1
Checking your session…