Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GOPINATH PUNDLIK MAHALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant, subject to conditions, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Gopinath Pundlik Mahale, who was implicated in FIR No.91/2026 for alleged theft of onion stock. The prosecution alleged that Mahale, along with two other accused, misappropriated onions belonging to Gfresh Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. The court noted that the main allegations were against another accused and that Mahale had no prior criminal record. Finding that the case did not warrant denial of bail and that the applicant was not the primary accused, the court granted anticipatory bail with standard conditions. The order directed Mahale to furnish a bail bond, report to the police on specified dates, and refrain from influencing witnesses or tampering with evidence.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in the present case.
  • Whether the allegations against the applicant justify denial of bail.
  • Whether the applicant's lack of prior criminal antecedents warrants grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • theft of agricultural produce
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                                                                       919-ABA.2324.26..DOC




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2324 OF 2026

                      Gopinath Pundlik Mahale                     … Applicant
                      V/s.
PRACHI                The State of Maharashtra                    …. Respondent
PRANESH
NANDIWADEKAR

Digitally signed by
PRACHI PRANESH
NANDIWADEKAR          Mr. Narayan Rokade i/b Ramchandra B. Wagh, for the Applicant.
Date: 2026.09.11
21:21:56 +0530        Mr. S. V. Walve, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                           CORAM:       MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
                                           DATED:       11 SEPTEMBER 2026
                      PC:-


                      1.     Heard Mr. Rokade, learned Counsel appearing for the

                      Applicant and Mr. Walve, learned APP, for the Respondent-State.



                      2.     By this Anticipatory Bail Application filed under Section 482

                      of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , the Applicant is

                      seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with CR No.91 of 2026

                      registered with the Chandwad Police Station, Nashik Rural, for the

                      offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(4) and 3(5) of the

                      Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.




                                                     Page 1
                      PPN
                                                     919-ABA.2324.26..DOC




3.      The prosecution case is set out in Paragraph No.2 of the

Anticipatory Bail Application, which reads as under:


     “2. On 07/03/2026, the Complainant, Gautamkumar
         Javerilal Dungarwal appeared before the Respondent
         Police Station and stated as under:
         i.     That he's aged 56 years does onion purchase and
                sale business, an authorised person for Gresh
                Agrotech Pvt. Ltd., Agricultural Produce Market
                Committee, Chandwad,
         ii.    He resides at the above address with his family. His
                sons, Shubham and Naman Dungarwal, have a
                company named Gfresh Agrotech Pvt. Ltd., which is
                a company registered with the Ministry of
                Corporate Affairs. Through the said company, they
                are carrying on the business of purchase and sale of
                onions. They also carry on the business of purchase
                and sale of onions through Jay Mahavir Adat. which
                is in the name of the Complainant's wife.
         iii.   For the last few years, there had been a difference
                in the quantity of onions purchased and sold by the
                said company. The work of unloading and loading
                the onion stock was being handled by Accused
                No.1, Gorakh Valmik Sathe. He had been working
                as a Manager for the company's transactions for the
                last five years.
         iv.    In order to discuss the difference in the onion stock
                and the decrease in income of the company and to
                find measures to prevent the same, an urgent
                meeting of the Board of Directors of the company
                was held on 05/01/2026. In the said meeting, the
                matter was discussed and measures were decided
                upon. Thereafter, the persons involved in the
                process of purchase and sale of onions were kept
                under observation.
         v.     On 31/01/2026, at about 9:30 am, when the onion
                auction was going on at the Agricultural Produce




                                  Page 2
PPN
                                               919-ABA.2324.26..DOC




            Market Committee, Chandwad, Gfresh Agrotech
            Pvt. Ltd. purchased red onions through Jay Mahavir
            Adat. Chandwad, at the auction rate of Rs. 926/-
            per quintal, as per Sale Receipt No. 127710. The
            said onions were loaded in Pickup Vehicle No. MH
            15 BJ 0199, which was being driven by Accused
            No.2, Akshay Sanjay Thorat.
      vi.   The said vehicle loaded with onions was weighed at
            the weighing scale of the Agricultural Produce
            Market Committee, Chandwad, on 31/01/2026 at
            about 10:13 am in the name of Gfresh Agrotech Pvt.
            Ltd. and Weight Receipt No. 1685 was issued.
      vii. The said onion stock was required to be unloaded at
           the yard of Gfresh Agrotech Pvt. Ltd., situated near
           Bhairavnath Temple. However, instead of unloading
           the onion stock there, Accused No.2, Akshay Thorat,
           took the same Pickup Vehicle No. MH 15 BJ 0199 to
           Dhage Weighing Scale at Chandwad at about 11:02
           am and got it weighed as per Weight Receipt No.
           7015.
      viii. Thereafter, the said vehicle was taken to
            Chhatrapati Trading Company, Manmad Road,
            Chandwad       Market    Committee,     Chandwad,
            belonging to Accused No.3, Gopinath Pundalik
            Mahale, Proprietor of Dishant Traders, who was a
            license holder. The onion stock was unloaded there
            by the Hamals and Maparis of the Market
            Committee.
      ix.   Thereafter, the said Pickup Vehicle No. MH 15 BJ
            0199 was again taken to Dhage Weighing Scale at
            about 11:37 am for MT weighing and the weight
            was recorded as 22.75 quintals. Thereafter, the
            vehicle was again taken to the Agricultural Produce
            Market Committee, Chandwad, for MT weighing,
            where the weight was recorded as 22.70 quintals
            and a weight receipt was obtained. The vehicle
            thereafter came to Gfresh Agrotech Pvt. Ltd.,
            Chandwad. At that time, the Complainant noticed




                              Page 3
PPN
                                                919-ABA.2324.26..DOC




            that the onion stock had been misappropriated and
            stolen.
      x.    At the weighing scale of the Agricultural Produce
            Market Committee, Chandwad, Accused No.1,
            Gorakh, who was working as Manager, told the Co-
            Manager, Rohit Shejwal, that the driver of Pickup
            Vehicle No. MH 15 BJ 0199, namely Accused No.2,
            Akshay Thorat, had suffered an injury to his leg and
            that the said Pickup Vehicle No. MH 15 BJ 0199 had
            broken down near Salim Hotel, Chandwad.
      xi.   At about 12:00 noon, Rohit Shejwal was called and
            his signature was obtained. Thereafter, when the
            driver of the said vehicle came to the onion market
            for preparing the Mapari receipt for receiving
            payment for the unloaded onions, the Complainant
            asked him where the onions had been unloaded.
            Accused No.2, Akshay Thorat, did not give a proper
            answer and gave unclear replies. He was unable to
            explain where the onion stock had been unloaded.
      xii. Thereafter, the Complainant took him into
           confidence and made detailed inquiries with him.
           During the inquiry, Accused No.2 stated that the
           22.70 quintals of onions purchased by Gfresh
           Agrotech Pvt. Ltd., Chandwad, had not been
           unloaded at the company's yard but had been
           unloaded at Chhatrapati Trading Company,
           Proprietor Gopinath Mahale, Manmad Road,
           Chandwad.
      xiii. Accused No.2 further stated that the said onion
            stock was unloaded on the instructions of Accused
            No.1, Gorakh Sathe. He also stated that Accused
            No.3, Gopinath Mahale, who was a license holder of
            the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, was
            also involved in the said act.
      xiv. The Mapari, Pravin Laxminarayan Joshi, kept the
           receipt relating to the said onion stock with himself
           and refused to prepare the same. Since June 2025,
           there had been a difference of approximately
           Rs.30,00,000/- in the purchase and sale of onion




                              Page 4
PPN
                                                919-ABA.2324.26..DOC




           stock. Accused No.1, Gorakh Valmik Sathe, had
           been working as the Manager of Gfresh Agrotech
           Pvt. Ltd. for the last five years. He was being paid a
           salary of Rs.12,000/- per month. It was also learnt
           that he was himself carrying on the business of
           purchase and sale of onions.
       xv. Accused No.1, Gorakh Valmik Sathe, had taken a
           place near Chhatrapati Trading Company on
           Manmad Road at Chandwad and had also
           purchased expensive vehicles. The Complainant
           suspected how the said Manager could have
           accumulated such property while receiving a salary
           of only Rs. 12,000/- per month for five years.
       xvi. Due to this suspicion, the Complainant kept watch
            on the activities and came to know about the
            alleged theft of the onion stock. He therefore
            suspected that accused No.1 was responsible for the
            shortage in the company's onion stock, with accused
            No.2, 3 and others helping him. The accused No.1
            used to visit the company's yard at night and
            misappropriate the onion stock.
       xvii. The Complainant informed the Agricultural Produce
             Market Committee, Chandwad. A spot panchnama
             was conducted on 31/01/2026 at about 12:30 p.m.,
             and a copy was given to the Complainant.
       xviii. Therefore, accused Nos. 1 to 3 misappropriated the
             onion stock belonging to Gfresh Agrotech Pvt. Ltd.
             between June 2025 and 31/01/2026.
       xix. Accordingly, on 07/03/2026, FIR bearing C.R
            No.91/2026 came to be registered at Chandwad
            Police Station, Nashik Rural for the offences
            punishable under Section 318(4), 316(4) & 3(5) of
            the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.”


4.    Perusal of the record shows that the main allegations are

against Accused No.1-Gorakh Valmik Sathe. Insofar as the




                              Page 5
PPN
                                                     919-ABA.2324.26..DOC




Applicant is concerned, the allegation is that he was purchasing the

goods from Accused No.1.



5.    There are no other criminal antecedents against the

Applicant.



6.    Thus, case is made out for grant of anticipatory bail. In view

thereof, the following Order is passed:


                              ORDER

      (a)    In the event of arrest of the Applicant - Gopinath

             Pundlik Mahale in connection with CR No.91 of 2026

             registered with the Chandwad Police Station, Nashik

             Rural, the Applicant is directed to be released on bail

             on his furnishing PR Bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-

             with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount.

      (b)    The Applicant shall attend the concerned Police

             Station on 28th September 2026 and 29th September

             2026 between 11:00 am and 02:00 pm and,

             thereafter, as and when called by the Investigating

             Officer, till filing of the Charge-sheet.




                                 Page 6
PPN
                                                 919-ABA.2324.26..DOC




      (c)   The Applicant shall furnish his cell phone number and

            residential address to the Investigating Officer and

            shall keep the same updated, in case of any change

            thereto.

      (d)   The Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any

            inducement, threat, or promise to any person

            acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade

            such a person from disclosing the facts to the Court or

            to any Police personnel.

      (e)   The Applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution

            evidence and shall not contact or influence the

            Complainant or any witness in any manner.


7.    The Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of accordingly.




                                         [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]




                               Page 7
PPN


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.