Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AKSHAY SANJAY THORATversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant with specified conditions.

Summary

The applicant, Akshay Sanjay Thorat, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No.91/2026 alleging theft of onion stock and misappropriation under Sections 318(4), 316(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that Thorat, as driver, acted on instructions of the manager Gorakh Valmik Sathe to divert and unload onions at an unauthorized location, resulting in loss to Gfresh Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. The court noted that the main accusation was against the manager and that Thorat had no prior criminal record. Considering the lack of antecedents and the applicant’s cooperation, the court found the case made out for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the court ordered Thorat’s release on bail with a personal bond of Rs.20,000, sureties, and imposed conditions restricting interference with witnesses, evidence, and the investigation.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the driver accused under Sections 318(4), 316(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the applicant poses a risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses.
  • Whether conditions can be imposed on the anticipatory bail to safeguard the investigation.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure
  • theft
  • misappropriation
  • bail conditions
  • onion market

Judgment

                                                                        60-ABA-2363-2026.DOC




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ARJUN                                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
VITTHAL                       ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2363 OF 2026
KUDHEKAR
Digitally signed by   Akshay Sanjay Thorat                                 …Applicant
ARJUN VITTHAL
KUDHEKAR                    Versus
Date: 2026.08.25
12:53:27 +0530        The State of Maharashtra                             …Respondent


                      Mr. Narayan Rokade i/b Ramchandra B. Wagh, for the Applicant.
                      Mr. S. V. Walve, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                            CORAM:       MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
                                            DATED:       24 AUGUST 2026
                      PC:-


                      1.      Heard Mr. Rokade, learned Counsel appearing for the

                      Applicant and Mr. Walve, learned APP, for the Respondent-State.



                      2.      By this Anticipatory Bail Application filed under Section 482

                      of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , the Applicant is

                      seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with CR No.91 of 2026

                      registered with the Chandwad Police Station, Nashik Rural, for the

                      offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(4) and 3(5) of the

                      Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.



                      3.      The prosecution case is set out in Paragraph No.2 of the

                      Anticipatory Bail Application, which reads as under:




                                                      Page 1
                      Arjun
                                                   60-ABA-2363-2026.DOC




   “2. On 07/03/2026, the Complainant, Gautamkumar
       Javerilal Dungarwal appeared before the Respondent
       Police Station and stated as under:
        i.     That he's aged 56 years does onion purchase and
               sale business, an authorised person for Gresh
               Agrotech Pvt. Ltd., Agricultural Produce Market
               Committee, Chandwad,
        ii.    He resides at the above address with his family. His
               sons, Shubham and Naman Dungarwal, have a
               company named Gfresh Agrotech Pvt. Ltd., which is
               a company registered with the Ministry of
               Corporate Affairs. Through the said company, they
               are carrying on the business of purchase and sale of
               onions. They also carry on the business of purchase
               and sale of onions through Jay Mahavir Adat. which
               is in the name of the Complainant's wife.
        iii.   For the last few years, there had been a difference
               in the quantity of onions purchased and sold by the
               said company. The work of unloading and loading
               the onion stock was being handled by Accused
               No.1, Gorakh Valmik Sathe. He had been working
               as a Manager for the company's transactions for the
               last five years.
        iv.    In order to discuss the difference in the onion stock
               and the decrease in income of the company and to
               find measures to prevent the same, an urgent
               meeting of the Board of Directors of the company
               was held on 05/01/2026. In the said meeting, the
               matter was discussed and measures were decided
               upon. Thereafter, the persons involved in the
               process of purchase and sale of onions were kept
               under observation.
        v.     On 31/01/2026, at about 9:30 am, when the onion
               auction was going on at the Agricultural Produce
               Market Committee, Chandwad, Gfresh Agrotech
               Pvt. Ltd. purchased red onions through Jay Mahavir
               Adat. Chandwad, at the auction rate of Rs. 926/-
               per quintal, as per Sale Receipt No. 127710. The
               said onions were loaded in Pickup Vehicle No. MH




                                 Page 2
Arjun
                                                 60-ABA-2363-2026.DOC




              15 BJ 0199, which was being driven by Accused
              No.2, Akshay Sanjay Thorat.
        vi.   The said vehicle loaded with onions was weighed at
              the weighing scale of the Agricultural Produce
              Market Committee, Chandwad, on 31/01/2026 at
              about 10:13 am in the name of Gfresh Agrotech Pvt.
              Ltd. and Weight Receipt No. 1685 was issued.
        vii. The said onion stock was required to be unloaded at
             the yard of Gfresh Agrotech Pvt. Ltd., situated near
             Bhairavnath Temple. However, instead of unloading
             the onion stock there, Accused No.2, Akshay Thorat,
             took the same Pickup Vehicle No. MH 15 BJ 0199 to
             Dhage Weighing Scale at Chandwad at about 11:02
             am and got it weighed as per Weight Receipt No.
             7015.
        viii. Thereafter, the said vehicle was taken to
              Chhatrapati Trading Company, Manmad Road,
              Chandwad       Market    Committee,     Chandwad,
              belonging to Accused No.3, Gopinath Pundalik
              Mahale, Proprietor of Dishant Traders, who was a
              license holder. The onion stock was unloaded there
              by the Hamals and Maparis of the Market
              Committee.
        ix.   Thereafter, the said Pickup Vehicle No. MH 15 BJ
              0199 was again taken to Dhage Weighing Scale at
              about 11:37 am for MT weighing and the weight
              was recorded as 22.75 quintals. Thereafter, the
              vehicle was again taken to the Agricultural Produce
              Market Committee, Chandwad, for MT weighing,
              where the weight was recorded as 22.70 quintals
              and a weight receipt was obtained. The vehicle
              thereafter came to Gfresh Agrotech Pvt. Ltd.,
              Chandwad. At that time, the Complainant noticed
              that the onion stock had been misappropriated and
              stolen.
        x.    At the weighing scale of the Agricultural Produce
              Market Committee, Chandwad, Accused No.1,
              Gorakh, who was working as Manager, told the Co-
              Manager, Rohit Shejwal, that the driver of Pickup




                                Page 3
Arjun
                                                  60-ABA-2363-2026.DOC




              Vehicle No. MH 15 BJ 0199, namely Accused No.2,
              Akshay Thorat, had suffered an injury to his leg and
              that the said Pickup Vehicle No. MH 15 BJ 0199 had
              broken down near Salim Hotel, Chandwad.
        xi.   At about 12:00 noon, Rohit Shejwal was called and
              his signature was obtained. Thereafter, when the
              driver of the said vehicle came to the onion market
              for preparing the Mapari receipt for receiving
              payment for the unloaded onions, the Complainant
              asked him where the onions had been unloaded.
              Accused No.2, Akshay Thorat, did not give a proper
              answer and gave unclear replies. He was unable to
              explain where the onion stock had been unloaded.
        xii. Thereafter, the Complainant took him into
             confidence and made detailed inquiries with him.
             During the inquiry, Accused No.2 stated that the
             22.70 quintals of onions purchased by Gfresh
             Agrotech Pvt. Ltd., Chandwad, had not been
             unloaded at the company's yard but had been
             unloaded at Chhatrapati Trading Company,
             Proprietor Gopinath Mahale, Manmad Road,
             Chandwad.
        xiii. Accused No.2 further stated that the said onion
              stock was unloaded on the instructions of Accused
              No.1, Gorakh Sathe. He also stated that Accused
              No.3, Gopinath Mahale, who was a license holder of
              the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, was
              also involved in the said act.
        xiv. The Mapari, Pravin Laxminarayan Joshi, kept the
             receipt relating to the said onion stock with himself
             and refused to prepare the same. Since June 2025,
             there had been a difference of approximately
             Rs.30,00,000/- in the purchase and sale of onion
             stock. Accused No.1, Gorakh Valmik Sathe, had
             been working as the Manager of Gfresh Agrotech
             Pvt. Ltd. for the last five years. He was being paid a
             salary of Rs.12,000/- per month. It was also learnt
             that he was himself carrying on the business of
             purchase and sale of onions.




                                Page 4
Arjun
                                                  60-ABA-2363-2026.DOC




          xv. Accused No.1, Gorakh Valmik Sathe, had taken a
              place near Chhatrapati Trading Company on
              Manmad Road at Chandwad and had also
              purchased expensive vehicles. The Complainant
              suspected how the said Manager could have
              accumulated such property while receiving a salary
              of only Rs. 12,000/- per month for five years.
          xvi. Due to this suspicion, the Complainant kept watch
               on the activities and came to know about the
               alleged theft of the onion stock. He therefore
               suspected that accused No.1 was responsible for the
               shortage in the company's onion stock, with accused
               No.2, 3 and others helping him. The accused No.1
               used to visit the company's yard at night and
               misappropriate the onion stock.
          xvii. The Complainant informed the Agricultural Produce
                Market Committee, Chandwad. A spot panchnama
                was conducted on 31/01/2026 at about 12:30 p.m.,
                and a copy was given to the Complainant.
          xviii. Therefore, accused Nos. 1 to 3 misappropriated the
                onion stock belonging to Gfresh Agrotech Pvt. Ltd.
                between June 2025 and 31/01/2026.
          xix. Accordingly, on 07/03/2026, FIR bearing C.R
               No.91/2026 came to be registered at Chandwad
               Police Station, Nashik Rural for the offences
               punishable under Section 318(4), 316(4) & 3(5) of
               the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.”


4.       Perusal of the record shows that the main allegations are

against Accused No.1-Gorakh Valmik Sathe. Insofar as the

Applicant is concerned, he was the driver of the vehicle and who

has acted as per the directions of Accused No.1-Gorakh Valmik

Sathe.




                                 Page 5
Arjun
                                                     60-ABA-2363-2026.DOC




5.      There are no other criminal antecedents against the

Applicant.



6.      Thus, case is made out for grant of anticipatory bail. In view

thereof, the following Order is passed:


                               ORDER

        (a)   In the event of arrest of the Applicant - Akshay Sanjay

              Thorat in connection with CR No.91 of 2026

              registered with the Chandwad Police Station, Nashik

              Rural, the Applicant is directed to be released on bail

              on his furnishing PR Bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/-

              with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount.

        (b)   The Applicant shall attend the concerned Police

              Station on 1st September 2026 and 2nd September

              2026 between 11:00 am and 02:00 pm and,

              thereafter, as and when called by the Investigating

              Officer, till filing of the Charge-sheet.

        (c)   The Applicant shall furnish his cell phone number and

              residential address to the Investigating Officer and

              shall keep the same updated, in case of any change




                                  Page 6
Arjun
                                                   60-ABA-2363-2026.DOC




              thereto.

        (d)   The Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any

              inducement, threat, or promise to any person

              acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade

              such a person from disclosing the facts to the Court or

              to any Police personnel.

        (e)   The Applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution

              evidence and shall not contact or influence the

              Complainant or any witness in any manner.


7.      The Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of accordingly.




                                           [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]




                                 Page 7
Arjun


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.