Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

FIROZ NARUDDIN KAZIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
Rejected

Holding

The correction of the C.R. number from 498 of 2025 to 497 of 2025 in the anticipatory bail application is permitted.

Summary

The Court entertained a motion to correct a clerical error in the anticipatory bail application where the Criminal Revision (C.R.) number was incorrectly stated as 498 of 2025 instead of 497 of 2025. The petitioner sought substitution of the wrong number and amendment of the prayer clause. The Court examined the request, found it to be a pure procedural correction, and allowed the amendment. The corrected order was directed to be uploaded. No substantive issues on the merits of the bail application were addressed.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • procedural correction
  • court order

Judgment

                                                       1
                                                                          2-ABA-2368-2025 (CR).DOC


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                             CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 2368 OF 2025

                     Firoz Naruddin Kazi                                  ...Petitioner
                           VERSUS
                     State of Maharashtra                                ...Respondent



                                            CORAM      :     NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.
                                            DATE       :     16th FEBRUARY 2026.
                     P.C.

                     1.       This matter is listed for speaking to the minutes of order

                     dated 8th January 2026.

                     2.       Leave to correct the C.R. number in Application and prayer

                     clause. Amendment to be carried out by tomorrow.

                     3.       In paragraph no. 1, line no. 3 ‘C.R. No. 498 of 2025’ is

                     mentioned instead of ‘C.R. No. 497 of 2025’.
IRESH
MASHAL
                     4.       Accordingly, ‘C.R. No. 498 of 2025’ be substituted with ‘C.R.
Digitally
signed by
IRESH
MASHAL
Date:
2026.02.18
                     No. 497 of 2025’. Corrected order be uploaded.
16:35:20
+0530



                     5.       Motion is allowed.



                                                             (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




             Iresh


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.