Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DEEPAK GAUTAM PANDEYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The Court disposed of the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Deepak Gautam Pandey, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. Consequently, he approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel argued that the purpose of anticipatory bail ceases once the applicant is in custody. The Court held that the applicant may withdraw the application and therefore disposed of it as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the bail claim were examined as the application was voluntarily withdrawn by the applicant.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the applicant has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                       KVM
                                                         1/1
                                                                           32 - ABA 2444 OF 2025.doc



          Digitally
          signed by
          KANCHAN
                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
KANCHAN   VINOD
VINOD     MAYEKAR
MAYEKAR   Date:
          2026.08.31
          18:37:55
          +0530                        CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2444 OF 2025

                       DEEPAK GAUTAM PANDEY                              ….. APPLICANT
                             VS
                       STATE OF MAHARASHTRA                              ….. RESPONDENT

                       Adv. Ashutosh D. Gade i/b. Adv. Kunal Jha for the Applicant.

                       Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent – State.

                                                CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
                                                DATE : 31ST AUGUST, 2026.

                       P.C. :-

                       1)           Learned counsel for the applicant states that during the

                       pendency of the instant application, the applicant has been arrested

                       and therefore seeks permission to withdraw the instant application.

                       2)           Accordingly the application is disposed of as withdrawn.



                                                               [PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.]


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.