Bombay High Court
DEVRAJ @ HAPPY TARKESHWAR SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The anticipatory bail application was withdrawn and consequently dismissed.
Summary
Arjun Vitthal Kudhekar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant was represented by Mr. Nikitesh Kotangale and co-counsel Nishant Singh, Krishma Joshi, Amit Jaiswar, and Sachet Patil. The State was represented by Mr. S. V. Walve, APP. After hearing, the learned judge expressed reluctance to grant anticipatory bail. Consequently, the applicant's counsel requested to withdraw the application. The Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the anticipatory bail application.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant under the circumstances.
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- criminal procedure
- withdrawal of application
- High Court
Judgment
23-ABA-2448-2026.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2448 OF 2026
ARJUN
VITTHAL Devraj @ Happy Tarkeshwar Singh …Applicant
KUDHEKAR Versus
Digitally signed by The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
ARJUN VITTHAL
KUDHEKAR
Date: 2026.09.17
12:47:19 +0530
Mr. Nikitesh Kotangale a/w Nishant Singh, Krishma Joshi, Amit
Jaiswar & Sachet Patil, for the Applicant.
Mr. S. V. Walve, APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED: 16 SEPTEMBER 2026
PC:-
1. Heard Mr. Kotangale, learned Counsel appearing for the
Applicant and Mr. Walve, learned APP, for the Respondent-State of
Maharashtra.
2. After arguing the Anticipatory Bail Application for some
time, as the Court is not inclined to grant relief, Mr. Kotangale,
learned Counsel for the Applicant, seeks withdrawal of the
Anticipatory Bail Application.
3. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to
be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Page 1
Arjun
Checking your session…