Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MUNTAQEEM ABDUL MATEEN SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant with stringent conditions.

Summary

Muntaqeem Abdul Mateen Shaikh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a theft case (Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023) where a motorcycle was stolen. The co‑accused was captured on CCTV, arrested and a chargesheet was filed, but the applicant was not seen in the footage. The prosecution argued that the applicant was part of the common intention, while the defence highlighted the completed investigation and the applicant’s willingness to cooperate. The Court examined the material and, noting the lack of direct evidence against the applicant, decided to grant anticipatory bail subject to stringent conditions. The order required a bond, regular police reporting, non‑interference with witnesses, and other restrictions.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023.
  • Whether the completed investigation and lack of CCTV evidence against the applicant justify bail.
  • Whether the applicant’s alleged participation in the theft warrants denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • theft
  • motorcycle theft
  • CCTV evidence
  • bail conditions
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

Judgment

                                                  41-ABA-2453-2026.DOC




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
         ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2453 OF 2026


Muntaqeem Abdul Mateen Shaikh                        …Applicant
      Versus
The State of Maharashtra                             …Respondent


Mr. Shaikh Ebaad a/w. Shaikh Rukhsar, for the Applicant.
Mr. S. V. Walve, APP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Sandeep Shivaji Pawar, BN 12108, attached to Kalamboli Police
Station, Navi Mumbai, present.


                       CORAM:      MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
                       DATED :     18th SEPTEMBER 2026
PC:-


1.       Heard Mr. Shaikh, learned Counsel appearing for the

Applicant and Mr. Walve, learned APP appearing for the

Respondent-State.



2.       This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”) seeking pre-arrest bail

in connection with C.R. No.159 of 2026 registered with Kalamboli

Police Station, Navi Mumbai, for the offences punishable under

Sections 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (“BNS”).




                                 Page 1
Sonali
                                                    41-ABA-2453-2026.DOC




3.       As per the prosecution case, motorcycle of the First

Informant was stolen and therefore, the FIR has been filed.



4.       It is the submission of learned Counsel appearing for the

Applicant that the co-accused was seen in the CCTV footage and

the co-accused has been arrested and the chargesheet is also ready

and therefore, the investigation is practically completed. He

submits that although there is antecedent against the Applicant, he

has been released on bail in that case. He submits that the

Applicant will co-operate with the investigation.



5.       On the other hand, learned APP strongly opposes the

Anticipatory Bail Application. He submits that the Applicant is

involved in the crime as the co-accused and the Applicant have

acted in furtherance of their common intention.



6.       Perusal of the record shows that the co-accused was seen in

the CCTV footage committing the theft of the said motorcycle.

However, the Applicant has not been seen in the said CCTV

footage. The co-accused has been arrested and the investigation is




                                 Page 2
Sonali
                                                   41-ABA-2453-2026.DOC




practically completed as the chargesheet has been submitted for

approval.



7.       Thus, in the facts and circumstances, the case is made out

for grant of Anticipatory Bail by imposing stringent conditions. In

view thereof, the following order is passed:


                               ORDER

         (a)   In the event of arrest of the Applicant-Muntaqeem

               Abdul Mateen Shaikh in connection with C.R. No.159

               of 2026 registered with the Kalamboli Police Station,

               Navi Mumbai, the Applicant is directed to be released

               on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of

               Rs.50,000/- with one or two solvent sureties in the

               like amount.

         (b)   The Applicant shall attend the concerned Police

               Station on 29th September 2026 and 30th September

               2026 between 11:00 a.m. to 01:00 p.m. and shall

               cooperate with the investigation.

         (c)   The Applicant shall attend the concerned Police

               Station on every Sunday between 11:00 a.m. to 02:00




                                 Page 3
Sonali
                                                                            41-ABA-2453-2026.DOC




                                   p.m. till the conclusion of the trial.

                             (d)   The Applicant shall furnish his cell phone number and

                                   residential address to the Investigating Officer and

                                   shall keep the same updated, in case of any change

                                   thereto.

                             (e)   The Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any

                                   inducement, threat, or promise to any person

                                   acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade

                                   such a person from disclosing the facts to the Court or

                                   to any Police personnel.

                             (f)   The Applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution

                                   evidence and shall not contact or influence the

                                   Complainant or any witness in any manner.

                             (g)   The Applicant shall not leave India without prior

                                   permission of the Court.


                    8.       The Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of accordingly.




                                                                  [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
       Digitally
       signed by
       SONALI
SONALI MILIND
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date:
       2026.09.19
       12:51:58
       +0530


                                                       Page 4
                    Sonali


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.