Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KAPIL NAVNATH BHIORversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The court held that anticipatory bail should be granted as the incident was spontaneous, the applicant has no prior antecedents, and the statutory power under Section 482 BNSS permits bail in such circumstances.

Summary

Kapil Navnath Bhoir applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with charges under Sections 118(2) and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for allegedly assaulting his friend with a metal bracelet after a dispute over liquor, causing serious injuries. The prosecution highlighted the seriousness of the injuries, while the defence argued that the incident was a spontaneous outburst, the parties were close friends, and the applicant had no prior criminal record. The court examined the nature of the offence, the risk of tampering, and the applicant's antecedents. Finding no pre‑meditation and noting the applicant's clean record, the court concluded that anticipatory bail was appropriate. Accordingly, the court ordered the applicant’s release on bail with a cash bond of Rs.30,000 and imposed several conditions, including regular police reporting and a prohibition on influencing witnesses.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 482 BNSS for offences punishable under Sections 118(2) and 115(2) BNS involving serious bodily injury.
  • Whether the seriousness of the injuries and the risk of evidence tampering outweigh the applicant’s lack of antecedents and the spontaneous nature of the incident.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • assault
  • bodily injury
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • pre‑arrest bail
  • no antecedents

Judgment

                                                 914-ABA-2516-2026.DOC




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
         ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2516 OF 2026


Kapil Navnath Bhoir                                  …Applicant
      Versus
The State of Maharashtra                             …Respondent


Mr. Kiran Patil a/w. Mr. Sandeep Gupta, for the Applicant.
Mr. P. P. Jadhav, APP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr. R. L. Vasave, PSI, attached to Neral Police Station, District -
Raigad, present.


                       CORAM:      MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
                       DATED :     22nd SEPTEMBER 2026
PC:-


1.       Heard Mr. Patil, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant

and Mr. Jadhav, learned APP appearing for the Respondent-State.



2.       This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”) seeking pre-arrest bail

in connection with C.R. No.153 of 2026 registered with Nerul

Police Station, District-Raigad, for the offences punishable under

Sections 118(2) and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

(“BNS”).




                                 Page 1
Sonali
                                                   914-ABA-2516-2026.DOC




3.       It is the submission of learned Counsel appearing for the

Applicant that the Applicant and the First Informant are good

friends and at the relevant time both of them were travelling

together on a motorcycle and some dispute took place on the issue

of consumption of liquor and therefore, on a spur of moment, the

incident in question has taken place. He submits that the Applicant

has no other antecedents. Therefore, he submits that the

Anticipatory Bail Application be allowed.



4.       On the other hand, learned APP strongly opposes the

Anticipatory Bail Application. He submits that the offence is very

serious. There are grievous injuries in the incident in question and

therefore, the Anticipatory Bail Application be rejected.



5.       The prosecution case is set out in paragraph No.2 of the

order dated 13th August 2026, passed by the learned Additional

Sessions Judge, Panvel, District-Raigad, passed in Criminal Bail

Application No.616 of 2026, which reads as under:



            “2. In nut shell, the case of the prosecution is that
            on July 6, 2026, at around 8:30 pm, the
            complainant met his friend, the Capplicant, at
            Vasant Bar near Neral Railway Station. While




                                  Page 2
Sonali
                                                914-ABA-2516-2026.DOC




            returning on the applicant's motorcycle toward
            Talwade, around 10:30 PM near Sainaika, Neral,
            the applicant asked the informant to purchase
            alcohol for him. Upon the informant's refusal due
            to lack of funds, the applicant got enraged,
            stopped the motorcycle, and physical violence
            ensued. The applicant allegedly slapped the
            informant, pulled him up by his shirt collar, and
            repeatedly punched him on his face, nose,
            eyebrows, and middle of his eyes using a heavy
            metal kada (bracelet) worn on his hand, followed
            by a punch to his chest. The informant sustained
            severe bleeding injuries near his left eye and
            nose, necessitating immediate medical treatment
            at the Government Hospital in Neral and
            subsequent admission to M.G.M. Hospital,
            Kalamboli, Panvel. The complainant, thus, set the
            criminal law into motion by lodging detailed
            report with Neral Police station. Eventually, an
            offence came to be registered at Neral police
            station vide C.R.No.153/2026 under above
            mentioned sections.”


6.       Although it is correct that the First Informant sustained

injuries and that the Applicant inflicted the said injuries with the

heavy metal “Kada” worn by him, the prosecution case shows that

the incident occurred on the spur of the moment. The Applicant

and the First Informant are close friends and were travelling

together on a motorcycle. It is alleged that the Applicant asked the

First Informant to take him to a hotel to consume liquor. As the

First Informant did not have money, he refused, therefore, some




                                Page 3
Sonali
                                                  914-ABA-2516-2026.DOC




dispute took place between both of them and the incident in

question has happened.



7.       Thus, it appears that the incident occurred on the spur of the

moment and there was no premeditation. There are no other

antecedents against the Applicant.



8.       Accordingly, the case is made out for grant of Anticipatory

Bail. In view thereof, the following order is passed:


                               ORDER

         (a)   In the event of arrest of the Applicant-Kapil Navnath

               Bhoir in connection with C.R. No.153 of 2026

               registered with the Neral Police Station, District-

               Raigad, the Applicant is directed to be released on bail

               on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/-

               with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount.

         (b)   The Applicant shall attend the concerned Police

               Station on 30th September 2026 and 1 st October 2026

               between 11:00 a.m. to 02:00 p.m. and shall cooperate

               with the investigation.

         (c)   The Applicant shall attend the concerned Police



                                  Page 4
Sonali
                                                                       914-ABA-2516-2026.DOC




                                   Station on 1st and 3rd Sunday of each month between

                                   11:00 a.m. to 02:00 p.m. till filing of the chargesheet

                                   and shall cooperate with the investigation.

                             (d)   The Applicant shall furnish his cell phone number and

                                   residential address to the Investigating Officer and

                                   shall keep the same updated, in case of any change

                                   thereto.

                             (e)   The Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any

                                   inducement, threat, or promise to any person

                                   acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade

                                   such a person from disclosing the facts to the Court or

                                   to any Police personnel.

                             (f)   The Applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution

                                   evidence and shall not contact or influence the

                                   Complainant or any witness in any manner.

                             (g)   The Applicant shall not leave India without prior

                                   permission of the Court.


                    9.       The Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of accordingly.




       Digitally                                                [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
       signed by
       SONALI
SONALI MILIND
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date:
       2026.09.23
       18:14:40
       +0530                                          Page 5
                    Sonali


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.