Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SATISH VITTHAL BAGULversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The anticipatory bail application is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

Satish Vitthal Bagul filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant, through counsel Mr. Mihir Kasliwal, later sought to withdraw the application. The respondent State, represented by Mr. B.B. Kulkarni, opposed the withdrawal. The Court considered the request and, without elaborating on substantive grounds, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was disposed of as withdrawn, and all other pending applications in the matter were also dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn by the applicant at the stage of hearing

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • Bombay High Court
  • application disposal

Judgment

                                                                                         69-ABA-2532-2026 (CR).doc

                              N.S.Kamble



                                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2532 OF 2026

                              Satish Vitthal Bagul                            ...Applicant
                              VERSUS
                              State Of Maharashtra                            ...Respondent
           Digitally signed   _________________________________________________________________
NILAM   by NILAM
        SANTOSH
SANTOSH KAMBLE
KAMBLE Date: 2026.10.07
        11:36:04 +0530
                              Mr.Mihir Kasliwal, for the Applicant.
                              Mr.B.B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State.
                              _________________________________________________________________
                                                                 CORAM          : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                 DATE           : 06th OCTOBER 2026

                              P.C. :

                              .             Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP for

                              the Respondent-State.

                              2.            The learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks

                              leave to withdraw the Application.         The Application is disposed of as

                              withdrawn.

                              3.            All pending Applications are disposed of.



                                                                                (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                                  Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.