Bombay High Court
QASIM RASHID KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and granted liberty to file a fresh application before the Sessions Court, to be decided on its own merits.
Summary
The applicant, Qasim Rashid Khan, sought anticipatory bail before the Sessions Court, but the application was decided solely on police papers with his counsel absent, resulting in a rejection on 24.01.2026. He subsequently filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court, requesting permission to withdraw it and to file a fresh application before the Sessions Court. The High Court observed that the earlier decision was made in the applicant's counsel's absence and therefore granted liberty to file a fresh application, directing that it be decided on its own merits without prejudice from the prior order. The High Court disposed of the present application as withdrawn, allowing the applicant to approach the Sessions Court anew. No substantive merits of bail were considered; the order was procedural.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of a prior anticipatory bail application decided in the absence of the applicant's counsel?
- Whether the applicant may withdraw the current anticipatory bail application and be permitted to file a fresh application before the Sessions Court?
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal of application
- fresh application
- procedural fairness
- high court order
Judgment
904-ABA-2726-2026.doc
vaishnavi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2726 OF 2026
Qasim Rashid Khan ...Applicant
V/s.
State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Sumit D. Sharma, for the Applicant.
Mr. Bapu V. Holambe Patil, APP for the Respondent – State.
Mr. Suhas Kamble, API, Kashigaon Police Station is present.
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
DATE : 29th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
P.C. :-
1. Before any arguments are advanced on merits by the
applicant, the learned APP has pointed out that the application filed
before the Sessions Court seeking anticipatory bail was decided by the
court only by perusing the police papers. It is pointed out that the
applicant’s Advocate was repeatedly absent and final order dated
24.01.2026 was passed by the Sessions Court rejecting the application.
2. In view of this, the learned counsel for applicant seeks
permission to withdraw the instant application with liberty to file fresh
application before the Sessions Court for seeking anticipatory bail for
1/2
904-ABA-2726-2026.doc
the applicant.
3. In view of the fact that the earlier anticipatory bail
application of the applicant was decided in absence of the learned
counsel for applicant, liberty is granted to the applicant to file fresh
application before the Sessions Court. It is clarified that in case any
fresh application is filed by the applicant, the same be decided on its
own merits without being influenced by earlier order passed by the
Sessions Court.
4. In view of this, the application is disposed of as withdrawn
with liberty to file fresh application before the Sessions Court.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)
2/2
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.