Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAGAR SHIVAJI DHAPATE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicants, subject to prescribed conditions.

Summary

The applicants, Sagar Shivaji Dhapate and Avinash Mahindra Chavan, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 188 of 2026 alleging offences under the Arms Act, 1959 and several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR arose from a dispute over dog bites that escalated into a physical assault, resulting in a fractured hand for the complainant. The prosecution alleged that the applicants participated in the assault, but the court noted the absence of any criminal antecedents and that the incident stemmed from a personal altercation. Weighing the need to protect the applicants' liberty against the investigatory requirements, the court found the case suitable for anticipatory bail. Consequently, the court ordered that the applicants be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000 each with sureties, and imposed standard conditions such as cooperation with police and non‑interference with witnesses.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriateness of granting anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 in the present case?
  • Do the allegations under the Arms Act, 1959 and the BNS, 2023 establish a prima facie case warranting arrest?
  • Whether the applicants' right to liberty outweighs the investigation's interest in their detention?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • BNSS 2023
  • Arms Act
  • assault
  • police investigation
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                                                 934-ABA-2743-2026.DOC




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
         ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2743 OF 2026


Sagar Shivaji Dhapate & Anr.                         …Applicants
      Versus
The State of Maharashtra                             …Respondent


Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal, for the Applicant.
Mrs. M. R. Tidke, APP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr D. N. Doiphode, Police Hawaldar, attached to Walchandnagar
Police Station, Pune, present.


                       CORAM:      MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
                       DATED :     30th SEPTEMBER 2026
PC:-


1.       Heard Mr. Bhujbal, learned Counsel appearing for the

Applicant and Mrs. Tikde, learned APP appearing for the

Respondent-State.



2.       This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”) seeking pre-arrest bail

in connection with C.R. No.188 of 2026 registered with

Walchandnagar Police Station, Pune Rural, Pune, for the offences

punishable under Sections 25 and 4 of the Arms Act, 1959 and




                                 Page 1
Sonali
                                               934-ABA-2743-2026.DOC




Sections 118(1), 190, 189(4), 126(2) and 191(3) of the Bharatiya

Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (“BNS”).



3.       The relevant details are as under:


 1. Name and Age of the Applicants         1. Sagar Shivaji Dhapate
                                           Age 34 yrs.
                                           2. Avinash Mahindra
                                           Chavan Age 27 yrs.
2. C.R. No.                                188 of 2026
3. Police Station                          Walchandnagar
4. Date of Incident                        10/06/2026
5. Date of Registration of F.I.R.          10/06/2026
6. Sections applied in F.I.R.              Sections 25 and 4 of the
                                           Arms Act, 1959 and
                                           118(1), 190, 189(4),
                                           126(2), 191(3) of the
                                           BNS.
7. Date of Arrest of Applicant                          -
8. Date of filing of Charge-sheet, if any.              -
9. Sections applied in Charge-sheet                     -
10. Any Special Statute invoked                         -
11. Total    number       &     Age     of One Victim aged 47 yrs.
    Deceased/Victim
12. Total Number of Accused                Six
13. Anticipatory     Bail/Regular     Bail The main accused No.1
    granted to any other Accused           is enlarged on regular
                                           bail by the Trial Court.

4.       The prosecution case is set out in paragraph No.2 of the

order dated 22nd September 2026, passed by the learned




                                  Page 2
Sonali
                                                  934-ABA-2743-2026.DOC




Additional Sessions Judge, Indapur, District- Pune, in Criminal Bail

Application No.171 of 2026, which reads as under:



            “2. The brief facts, which led to the filing of the
            FIR can be summarized as under -

            That on 10.06.2026 informant Sanjay Gawade
            lodged the FIR with Walchandnagar Police
            Station alleging that on 09.06.2026, dog of Akash
            Gawade had took bite to his dog. When the same
            was questioned, Akash Gawade abused &
            threatened him to kill. On 10.06.2026, around
            08.00 am, while he was proceeding by his
            motorcycle, Akash Gawade, Sagar Dhapate,
            Avinash Jadhav, Dada Chougule & other two
            unknown persons came there by their two
            motorcycles & intercepted his motorcycle. He was
            encircled by them. Akash Gawade abused & gave
            strokes of Koyta on his right hand whereby, he
            sustained bleeding injury. He rushed to the
            hospital where, doctor informed him that his
            right hand was fractured & advised operation.
            Making such allegations, he lodged FIR in the
            Walchandnagar Police Station. Accordingly, C. R.
            No. 188/2026 came to be registered at
            Walchandnagar Police Station. During the course
            of investigation Akash came to be arrested and
            therefore, applicants apprehend their arrest in
            the present crime and therefore, they are seeking
            protection by way of anticipatory bail.”


5.       Even as per the prosecution case, the incident has taken

place concerning fights between two dogs. As far as the present




                                 Page 3
Sonali
                                                  934-ABA-2743-2026.DOC




Applicants are concerned, there are no criminal antecedents

against them.



6.       Accordingly, the case is made out for grant of Anticipatory

Bail. In view thereof, the following order is passed:


                               ORDER

         (a)   In the event of arrest of the Applicants-Sagar Shivaji

               Dhapate and Avinash Mahindra Chavan in connection

               with C.R. No.188 of 2026 registered with the

               Walchandnagar Police Station, Pune Rural, Pune, the

               Applicants are directed to be released on bail on their

               furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each

               with one or two solvent sureties each in the like

               amount.

         (b)   The Applicants shall attend the concerned Police

               Station as and when called by the Investigating Officer

               and shall cooperate with the investigation.

         (c)   The Applicants shall furnish their cell phone number

               and residential address to the Investigating Officer

               and shall keep the same updated, in case of any




                                 Page 4
Sonali
                                                            934-ABA-2743-2026.DOC




                        change thereto.

                  (d)   The Applicants shall not directly or indirectly make

                        any inducement, threat, or promise to any person

                        acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade

                        such a person from disclosing the facts to the Court or

                        to any Police personnel.

                  (e)   The Applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution

                        evidence and shall not contact or influence the

                        Complainant or any witness in any manner.


         7.       The Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of accordingly.




                                                     [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]


       Digitally
       signed by
       SONALI
SONALI MILIND
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date:
       2026.09.30
       17:56:26
       +0530




                                           Page 5
         Sonali


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.