Bombay High Court
HEMANT @ NANDU KASHINATH SHINDEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application with liberty to file a fresh application.
Summary
Hemant Shinde applied for anticipatory bail. The State contended that the applicant had eight antecedent cases but only five were disclosed. The applicant's counsel requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and be permitted to file a fresh one. The Court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh application, expressly stating that it had not examined the merits and all contentions remain open. No substantive merits of the bail issue were decided.
Issues considered
- Whether an anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn by the applicant with liberty to file a fresh application
- Whether the court can permit a fresh anticipatory bail application without deciding the merits of the original application
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal
- procedural
- criminal procedure
- antecedents
Judgment
925 ABA-2773-2026.DOC
skt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2773 OF 2026
Hemant @ Nandu Kashinath Shinde …Applicant
Vs.
State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. Aniket Vagal a/w. Ms. Juhi Kadu and Savvy Kolhekar, for the
Applicant.
Mr. Prashant P. Jadhav, APP for the Respondent-State.
Head Constable Shinde, Yeola Police Station.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 8th OCTOBER, 2026
P. C.:
1. At the outset, Mr. Jadhav, learned APP states that there are
eight antecedents against the Applicant and only five antecedents
have been disclosed.
2. In view of the said contention raised by learned APP, Mr.
Vagal, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant seeks
withdrawal of anticipatory bail application with liberty to file fresh
anticipatory bail application.
3. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to
be withdrawn with liberty as sought.
Page 1 of 2
8th October, 2026
925 ABA-2773-2026.DOC
skt
4. It is clarified that this Court has not considered merits and
all contentions of the parties are expressly kept open.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Page 2 of 2
8th October, 2026
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.